Using Targeting Outcomes of Programs as a Framework to Target Photographic Events in Nonformal Educational Programs

Abstract

Targeting Outcomes of Programs (TOP) is a seven-step hierarchical programming model in which the program development and performance sides are mirror images of each other. It served as a framework to identify a simple method for targeting photographic events in nonformal education programs, indicating why, when, and how photographs would be useful to inform other evaluation strategies. In two case studies, photographs enhanced the formative story of a geoscience project being developed and tested, and contributed to the outcome narrative of a 10-year partnership project between two universities. In both cases, TOP proved to be an efficient and easy-to-use framework. Using TOP in this fashion has the potential to help evaluators address challenges posed by the subjectivity of photography and possible biases of the photographer in the research process.

Keywords

targeting outcomes of programs (TOP)photography in mixed method evaluations photographic events nonformal education

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Albrecht

J. A.

Prochaska-Cue

Rockwell

S. K.

Pulatov

P. A.

(2010, December). Introducing extension/outreach education in Tajikistan. Journal of Extension, 48, Article 6FEA8. Retrieved from www.joe.org/joe

Becker

(1979). Do photographs tell the truth. In Cook

T. D.

Reichardt

C. S.

(Eds.), Qualitative and quantitative methods in evaluation research Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

Bellman

B. L.

Jules-Rosette

(1977). A paradigm for looking: Cross-cultural research with visual media Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

Bessell

A. G.

Deese

W. B.

Medina

A. L.

(2007). Photolanguage: How a picture can inspire a thousand words. American Journal of Evaluation, 28, 558–569.

Collier

Jr. Collier

(1986). Visual anthropology: Photography as a research method Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.

Fetterman

D. M.

(2010). Ethnography: Step by step (3rd ed.) Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Fitzpatrick

(2000). Dialogue with David Fetterman. American Journal of Evaluation, 21, 242–260.

Harper

(2002). Talking about pictures: A case for photo elicitation. Visual Studies, 17, 13–26.

Heider

K. G.

(1976). Ethnographic film Austin: University of Texas Press.

10.

Hurtworth

Sweeney

(1995). The use of the visual image in a variety of Australian evaluations. Evaluation Practice, 16, 153–164.

11.

Jordan

Adams

Pawley

Radcliffe

(2009, October). The affordances of photo elicitation as a research and pedagogical tool . In Proceedings of the frontiers in education conference San Antonio, TX:

12.

Kuehn

Thompson

(2007). Evaluating extension efforts along Lake Ontario’s eastern shore. Journal of Extension, 45, Article 3RIB5. Retrieved from www.joe.org/joe

13.

Llewellyn

(2002). Inquire within: Implementing inquiry-based science standards Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

14.

Penna

R. M.

Phillips

W. J.

(2004). Outcome frameworks: An overview for practitioners (1st ed.) Rensselaerville, NY: The Rensselaerville Institute.

15.

Pink

(2006). Doing visual ethnography: Images, media and representation in research anthropology Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

16.

Rockwell

S. K.

(2007). Development and implementation of a field-based inquiry-focused geoscience course for pre-service teachers Lincoln: University of Nebraska, Nebraska Center for Research on Children, Youth, Families & School.

17.

Rockwell

S. K.

Albrecht

Nugent

Kunz

Prochaska-Cue

(2008, November). Photography enhances evaluation processes and the study’s usability. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Evolutions Association, Denver, CO.

18.

Rockwell

S. K.

Bennett

C. F.

(2004). Targeting outcomes of programs (TOP): A hierarchy for targeting outcomes and evaluating their achievement. Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/aglecfacpub/48

19.

Rockwell

S. K.

Rockwell

L. V.

Albrecht

(2006). Outcomes from state department grants to build a stable economy in Tajikistan. Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/aglecfacpub/50

20.

Spiegel

A. N.

Bruning

R. H.

Gidding

(1999). Using responsive evaluation to evaluate a professional conference. American Journal of Evaluation, 20, 57–67.

21.

Taylor-Powell

Steele

(1996). Collecting evaluation data: An overview of sources and methods. Retrieved from www.uwex.edu/ces/pdande/evaluation/evaldocs.html

22.

Townsend

M. S.

Sylva

Martin

Metz

Wooten-Swanson

(2008). Improving readability of an evaluation tool for low-income clients using visual information processing theories. Journal of Nutrition Education Behavior, 40, 181–186.

23.

United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. (1991). International standard classification of education ISCED 1997 Paris, France: Author.

24.

White

Sasser

Borgren

Morgan

(2009). Photos can inspire a thousand words: Photolanguage as a qualitative evaluation method. Journal of Extension, 47, Article 3IAW1. Retrieved from www.joe.org/joe