This article explores the important role that past editors of the American Journal of Evaluation and its predecessors, Evaluation Practice and Evaluation News, played in the development of the American Evaluation Association (AEA). In interviews presented here, the editors recount the history of the association, the journal, and the field as they experienced it. Using a variety of sources, the author provides additional context for their remarks, describing the pioneering efforts of early evaluation associations, the contentious mergers that resulted in a single national association, the emergence of dedicated evaluation publications, and the challenges posed by an increasingly diverse membership. The author concludes by discussing the ways in which the editors, throughout their 35 years of service, strengthened not only professional associations but the larger field of evaluation.
American Evaluation Association. (2008). American Evaluation Association Internal Scan Report to the Membership, by Goodman Research Group. Retrieved fromwww.eval.org
3.
BackerT. E.AttkissonC. C.BarryJ. R.BrockT. C.DavisH. R.KiresukT. J.WindleC. (1980). Information resources for program evaluators. Evaluation and Program Planning, 3, 25–33.
4.
BerkR. A.FreemanH. E. (1979). From Evaluation Quarterly to Evaluation Review. Evaluation Review, 3, 515.
5.
ChristieC. A.VoA. T. (2011). Promoting diversity in the field of evaluation: Reflections on the first year of the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Evaluation Fellowship Program. American Journal of Evaluation. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1177/1098214011399644
6.
ConnerR. F.DickmanF. B. (1979). Professionalization of evaluative research: Conflict as a sign of health. Evaluation and Program Planning, 2, 103–109.
7.
CronbachL. J.AmbronS. R.DornbuschS. M.HessR. D.HornikR. C.PhillipsD. C.WeinerS. S. (1980). Toward reform of program evaluationSan Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
8.
DavisB. G. (1981). News of the network. Evaluation News, 2, 4–6.
9.
EichelbergerR. T. (1984). Change in evaluation news editor. American Journal of Evaluation, 5, 10–13.
EichelbergerR. T. (1986). Editor’s note. Evaluation Practice, 7, 5.
12.
Instructions to authors. (1978). Evaluation and Program Planning, 1, CO3-CO3.
13.
JerrellJ. M. (1981). Evaluation research society. Evaluation News, 2, 10–11.
14.
JerrellJ. M. (1983). Hard times. Evaluation News, 4, 86–88.
15.
KatzenmeyerC. (1984). What should ENet be and do?. Evaluation News, 5, 13–17.
16.
KatzenmeyerC.KirkhartK. (1982). ENet: Facts and folklore. Evaluation News, 3, 85–88.
17.
KornJ. H. (1983a). Letters to the editor. Evaluation News, 4, 75–77.
18.
KornJ. H. (1983b). Letters to the editor. Evaluation News, 4, 61–62.
19.
LincolnY. S.GubaE. G. (2004). The roots of fourth generation evaluation: Theoretical and methodological origins. In AlkinM. C. (Ed.), Evaluation roots: Tracing theorists’ views and influences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
20.
NagelS. (1984). Current activities of the professional relations committee of the evaluation network. Evaluation News, 5, 13–16.
21.
NowakowskiJ. (1985). To be or not to be: Reflections on a strong professional field. American Journal of Evaluation, 6, 92–96.
22.
PattonM. Q. (1988a). The evaluator’s responsibility for utilization. Evaluation Practice, 9, 5–24.
23.
PattonM. Q. (1988b). How primary is your identity as an evaluator?. Evaluation Practice, 9, 87–92.
24.
PattonM. Q. (1997). Utilization-focused evaluation: The new century text
(3rd ed.)
Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
25.
PophamW. J. (1979). Statement of EEPA editorial policy. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 1, 1.
26.
ShadishW. R.EpsteinR. (1987). Patterns of program evaluation practice among members of the evaluation research society and evaluation network. Evaluation Review, 11, 555–590.
27.
SmithM. F. (1990). From the editor. Evaluation Practice, 11, v–vii.
28.
SmithN. L. (1989). The Weiss-Patton debate: Illumination of the fundamental concerns. Evaluation Practice, 10, 5–13.
29.
Social science and the citizen. (1977). Society, 14, 8-8.
30.
StakeR. E. (1982). The two cultures and the evaluation evolution. Evaluation News, 3, 10–14.
31.
The Oral History Project Team (2004). The oral history of evaluation part II: The professional development of Lois-ellin Datta. The American Journal of Evaluation, 25, 243–253.
32.
The Oral History Project Team. (2005). The oral history of evaluation, Part 3. American Journal of Evaluation, 26, 378–388.
33.
The Oral History Project Team. (2010). The oral history of evaluation: The professional development of Marvin C. Alkin. American Journal of Evaluation, 31, 266–277.
34.
WeissC. H. (1988a). Evaluation for decisions: Is anybody there? Does anybody care?. Evaluation Practice, 9, 5–19.
35.
WeissC. H. (1988b). If program decisions hinged only on information: A response to Patton. Evaluation Practice, 9, 15–28.
36.
What Evaluation Network members say about themselves. (1982). Evaluation News, 3, 9–13.
37.
WorthenB. R. (1998). Same old same old? Well, not really. American Journal of Evaluation, 19, vii–xiii.
