In this article, the authors state two arguments: first, that the four categories of context, politics, polity, and policy make an adequate framework for systematic review being both exhaustive and parsimonious; second, that the method of qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) is an appropriate methodical approach for gaining realistic results that are useful for political practice. Instead of providing unsatisfactory monocausal explanations, the approach identifies different combinations of conditions leading to a given outcome. The authors illustrate their points with a two-step multi-value QCA (mvQCA) of 17 transport policy cases in Switzerland.
BefaniB.LedermannS.SagerF. (2007). Realistic evaluation and QCA. Conceptual parallels and an empirical application. Evaluation, 13, 171–192.
2.
Berg-SchlosserD.De MeurG.RihouxB.RaginC. C. (2008). Qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) as an approach. In RihouxB.RaginC. C. (Eds.), Configurational comparative methods. Qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) and related techniques (pp. 1–18). London, Thousand Oaks, CA, and New Delhi: Sage.
3.
BickmanL. (Ed.). (1987). ‘Using program theory in evaluation’, new directions for program evaluation. Vol. 33, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
4.
BradyH. E.CollierD.SeawrightJ. (2006). Toward a pluralistic vision of methodology. Political Analysis, 14, 353–368.
5.
ChenH.RossiP. (1992). Using theory to improve policy and program evaluations. Westport, CT: Greenwood.
6.
ConnellJ.KubishA.SchorrL.WeissC. (1995). New approaches to evaluating community initiatives. New York, NY: Aspen Institute.
7.
CronqvistL. (2006). Tosmana – Tool for small-N analysis. (Version 1.254)Marburg: University of Marburg.
8.
CronqvistL.Berg-SchlosserD. (2008). Multi-value QCA (MVQCA). In RihouxB.RaginC. C. (Eds.), Configurational comparative methods. Qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) and related techniques. London, Thousand Oaks, CA, and New Delhi: Sage.
9.
De MeurG.RihouxB. (2002). L’analyse quali-quantitative comparée (AQQC-QCA): Approche, techniques et applications en sciences humaines [Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA): Approach, technique, and applications in the Humanities]. Louvain-la-Neuve: Bruylant-Academia.
10.
De MeurG.RihouxB.YamasakiS. (2008). Addressing the critiques of QCA. In RihouxB.RaginC. C. (Eds.), Configurational comparative methods. Qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) and related techniques (pp. 147–165). London, Thousand Oaks, CA, and New Delhi: Sage.
11.
FischerF. (1990). Technocracy and the politics of expertise. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
12.
HeinrichC. J. (2007). Evidence-based policy and performance management. Challenges and prospects in two parallel movements. The American Review of Public Administration, 37, 255–277.
13.
LinderW. (2006). Politische Kultur [Political Culture]. In KlötiU.KnoepfelP.KriesiH.LinderW.PapadopoulosY.SciariniP. (Eds.), Handbuch Schweizer Politik [Handbook of Swiss Politics] (pp. 15–34). Zurich: Verlag Neue Zürcher Zeitung.
14.
MahoneyJ.GoertzG. (2006). A tale of two cultures: Contrasting quantitative and qualitative research. Political Analysis, 14, 227–249.
15.
MertonR. K. (1968). Social theory and social structure. New York, NY and London: Free Press.
16.
PawsonR. (2002a). Evidence-based policy: In search of a method. Evaluation, 8, 157–181.
17.
PawsonR. (2002b). Evidence-based policy: The promise of “realist synthesis.”Evaluation, 8, 340–358.
18.
PawsonR.TilleyN. (1997). Realistic evaluation. London, Thousand Oaks, CA, and New Delhi: Sage.
19.
RaginC. C. (1987). The comparative method. Moving beyond qualitative and quantitative strategies. Berkeley, CA, Los Angeles, CA, and London: University of California Press.
20.
RaginC. C. (2007). Foreword. In SchneiderC. Q.WagemannC. (Eds.), Qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) und Fuzzy Sets. Ein Lehrbuch for Anwender und solche, die es werden wollen [A Textbook for Users and those who want to become it] (pp. 13–18). Opladen and Farmington Hills: Verlag Barbara Budrich.
21.
RihouxB.RaginC. C. (Eds.). (2008). Configurational comparative methods. Qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) and related techniques. London, Thousand Oaks, CA, and New Delhi: Sage.
22.
SagerF. (2005). Metropolitan institutions and policy coordination. The integration of land use and transport policies in Swiss urban areas. Governance, 18, 227–256.
23.
SagerF. (2007a). Making transport policy work: Polity, policy, politics and systematic review. Policy & Politics, 35, 269–288.
24.
SagerF. (2007b). Habermas’ models of decisionism, technocracy, and pragmatism in times of governance. The relationship of public administration, politics, and science in the alcohol prevention policies of the Swiss member states. Public Administration, 85, 429–447.
25.
SagerF. (2008). Planning, power, and policy change in the networked city: The politics of a new tramway in the city of Bern. In PfliegerG.PattaroniL.JemelinC.KaufmannV. (Eds.), The social fabric of the networked city (pp. 169–187). Lausanne and Oxford: EPFL Press/Routledge.
26.
ScharpfF. W. (1993). Legitimationsprobleme der Globalisierung. Regieren in Verhandlungssystemen [Legitimization problems of globalization. Governing in negotiation systems]. Köln: MPIFG Discussion Paper.
27.
SchenkelW.OetterliD.SagerF.AndereggenC.RüefliC.HügliE.BlumensteinA. (2009). Verkehrspolitische Entscheidfindung in der Verkehrsplanung. Eine systematische Prozess- und Kommunikationsanalyse [Political decision-making in transport planning. A systematic analysis of processes and communication]. Bern: SVI.
28.
SchneiderC. Q.WagemannC. (2006). Reducing complexity in qualitative comparative analysis (QCA): Remote and proximate factors and the consolidation of democracy. European Journal of Political Research, 45, 751–786.
29.
SchneiderC. Q.WagemannC. (2007). Qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) und Fuzzy Sets. Ein Lehrbuch für Anwender und solche, die es werden wollen [A Textbook for Users and those who want to become it]. Opladen and Farmington Hills: Verlag Barbara Budrich.
30.
SimonsH. (2004). Utilizing evaluation evidence to enhance professional practice. Evaluation, 10, 410–429.
31.
TreibO.BährH.FalknerG. (2007). Modes of governance: Towards a conceptual clarification. Journal of European Public Policy, 14, 1–20.
32.
Van der KnaapL. M.LeeuwF.BogaertsS.NijssenL. T. J. (2008). Combining Campbell standards and the realist evaluation. The best of two worlds?. American Journal of Evaluation, 29, 48–57.
33.
VatterA.SagerF.BühlmannM.MaibachM. (2000). Akzeptanz der schweizerischen Verkehrspolitik bei Volksabstimmungen und im Vollzug [Acceptance of Swiss Transport Policy in Public Votes and in Implementation]. Bern: BBL/EDMZ.
