Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

In this paper we describe an evaluation training program sponsored by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation and led by Duquesne University and OMG Center for Collaborative Learning designed to meet the challenge of developing a cadre of diverse evaluation professionals, specifically those from traditionally underrepresented or underserved communities, who have come to the field with little formal academic training in evaluation. Our interview reveals that an essential strength of this work is the collaborative relationship between an academic institution and a non-profit firm. Three additional discussion points emerged that are important learnings from this work. First, post-degree practicum training models must consider not only the training of participants, but also organizational transformation. Second, there is a genuine tension between expanding the program and the seemingly necessary responsive and intimate nature of educational programs intended to develop communities of practice, and a third and related point, are considerations of program sustainability.

Keywords

evaluation training diversity theory and practice

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bledsoe

K. L.

Hopson

R. K.

(2008). Conducting ethical research in underserved communities. In Ginsberg

Mertens

D. M.

(Eds.), The handbook of social research ethics. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Christie

C. A.

Klein

B. M.

(2009). Developing a community of practice: Learning and transformation through evaluation. In Cousins

Ryan

(Eds.), International handbook of educational evaluation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Collins

Hopson

(2007). Building leadership development, social justice, and social change in evaluation through a pipeline program. In Hannum

Martineau

J. W.

Reinelt

(Eds.), The handbook of leadership development evaluation (pp. 173–198). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bas.

The Colorado Trust. (2007). The importance of culture in evaluation: A guide for evaluators. Author.

Ghere

King

J. A.

Stevahn

Minnema

(2006). A professional development unit for reflecting on program evaluator competencies. American Journal of Evaluation, 27, 108–123.

Greene

J. C.

(2006). Evaluation, democracy, and social change. In Shaw

Greene

Mark

(Eds.), Handbook of evaluation (pp. 102–122). London, England: Sage.

Greene

J. C.

Millett

Hopson

(2004). Evaluation as democratizing practice. In Braverman

Constantine

Slater

J. K.

(Eds.), Foundations and evaluation: Contexts and practices for effective philanthropy (pp. 96–118). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Hood

(1998). Responsive evaluation Amistad style: Perspectives of one African-American evaluator. In Sullivan

(Ed.), Proceedings of the stake symposium on educational evaluation. Urbana-Champaign: University of Illinois Press.

Hood

(2001). Nobody knows my name: In praise of African American evaluators who were responsive. New Directions for Evaluation, 92, 31–43.

10.

Hood

Hopson

Frierson

(Eds.). (2005). The role of culture and cultural context: A mandate for inclusion, the discovery of truth, and understanding in evaluative theory and practice. Greenwich, CT: Information Age.

11.

Hopson

(2009). Reclaiming knowledge at the margins: Culturally responsive evaluation in the current evaluation moment. In Ryan

Cousins

(Eds.), International handbook on evaluation (pp. 431–448). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

12.

Kirkhart

(2005). Through a cultural lens: Reflections on validity and theory in evaluation. In Hood

Hopson

R. K.

Frierson

H. T.

(Eds.) The role of culture and cultural context: A mandate for inclusion, the discovery of truth, and understanding in evaluative theory and practice (pp. 21–39). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing, Inc.

13.

LaVelle

J. M.

Donaldson

S. I.

(2010). University-based evaluation training programs in the United States 1980-2009: An empirical examination. American Journal of Evaluation, 31, 9–23.

14.

Mertens

D. M.

(2009). Research and evaluation in education and psychology: Integrating diversity with quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

15.

Mertens

D. M.

Hopson

R. K.

(2006). Advancing evaluation of STEM efforts through attention to diversity and culture. In Huffman

Lawrenz

(Eds.), Critical issues in STEM evaluation (pp. 35–51) New Directions for Evaluation, 109, Spring.

16.

Rogers

E. M.

(2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). New York, NY: Free Press.

17.

SenGupta

Hopson

Thompson-Robinson

(2004). Cultural competence in evaluation: An overview. In Thompson-Robinson

Hopson

SenGupta

(Eds.), In search of cultural competence in evaluation: Toward principles and practices. New Directions for Evaluation (pp. 5–18). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

18.

Stevahn

King

J. A.

Ghere

Minnema

(2005). Establishing essential competencies for program evaluators. American Journal of Evaluation, 26, 43–59.

19.

Stokes

Chaplin

Dessouky

Aklilu

Hopson

(In press). Serving marginalized populations through culturally responsive evaluation. Diaspora, Indigenous, and Minority Education.

20.

Trevisan

M. S.

(2004). Practical training in evaluation: A review of the literature. American Journal of Evaluation, 25, 255–272.

21.

Wenger

(1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

22.

Wenger

McDermott

Snyder

(2002). Cultivating communities of practice: A guide to managing knowledge. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

Promoting Diversity in the Field of Evaluation

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References