This study addresses the central question “How do evaluators' background characteristics relate to their evaluation design choices?” Evaluators were provided with a fictitious description of a school-based program and asked to design an evaluation of that program. Relevant background characteristics such as level of experience, methodological preferences, evaluation utilization preferences, and level of education were collected from each respondent. Major findings indicate that evaluators' methodological and use preferences were significantly related to specific design choices for the fictitious evaluation.
AlkinM. (2004). Evaluation roots: Tracing theorists views and influences. Thousand Oaks, CA.
2.
AlkinM. (1990). Debates on evaluation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
3.
AzzamT. (2010). Evaluator stakeholder responsiveness. American Journal of Evaluation, 31, 45.
4.
ChristieC. (2003). What guides evaluation? A study of how evaluation practice maps onto evaluation theory. New Directions in Evaluation, 97, 7–37.
5.
ChristieC. A.MasynK. E. (2008). Latent profiles of evaluators' self-reported practices. Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation, 23, 225–254.
6.
CronbachL. J.AmbronS. R.DornbuschS. M.HessR.D.HornikR. C.PhillipsD. C.WeinerS. S. (1980). Toward reform of program evaluation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
7.
GranvilleA. (1977). Where do school decisions really come from? Sources of influence and the influence of evaluation. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles, California.
8.
GreeneJ. C. (1988). Stakeholder participation and utilization in program evaluation. Evaluation Review, 12, 91–116.
9.
HofstetterC.AlkinM. (2003). Evaluation use revisited. In StufflebeamD.KellaghanT. (Eds.), International handbook of educational evaluation (pp. 197–222). New York, NY: Springer Press.
10.
KaplanA. (1964). The conduct of inquiry. San Francisco, CA: Chandler Press.
11.
McGrathJ. E.MartinJ.KulkaR. A. (1982). Judgment calls in research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
12.
PattonM. Q. (1997). Utilization-focused evaluation: The new century text. (3rd ed.)
Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
13.
PattonM. Q. (1987). Evaluation’s political inherency: Practical implications for design and use. In PalumboD. (Ed.), The politics of program evaluation (pp. 100–145). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
