Abma, T.A., & Stake, R.E. ( 2001). Stake’s responsive evaluation: Core ideas and evolution . New Directions for Evaluation, 92, 7-22.
2.
Alkin, M.C., & Christie, C.A. (2004). An evaluation theory tree . In M. C. Alkin (Ed.), Evaluation roots: Tracing theorists’ views and influences. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
3.
Amo, C., & Cousins, J.B. ( 2007). Going through the process: An examination of the operazionalization of process use in empirical research on evaluation. New Directions for Evaluation, 116, 5-26.
4.
The art, craft, and science of evaluation capacity building. Baizerman, M., Compton, D. W., & Stockdill, S. H. (Eds.). (2002). New Directions for Evaluation, 93.
5.
Christie, C.A. ( 2003). What guides evaluation? A study of how evaluation practice maps on to evaluation theory. New Directions for Evaluation , 97, 7-36.
6.
Cousins, J.B., & Earl, L.M. ( 1992). The case for participatory evaluation. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 14, 397-418.
7.
Cousins, J.B., & Whitmore, E. ( 1998). Framing participatory evaluation. New Directions for Evaluation, 80, 5-23.
8.
Donaldson, S. I., Christie, C. A., & Mark, M. M. (Eds.). (2009). What counts as credible evidence in applied research and evaluation practice?Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
9.
Eisner, E. ( 1991). The enlightened eye. New York, NY : MacMillan.
10.
Fetterman, D. ( 1994). Empowerment evaluation. Evaluation Practice , 15, 1-15.
11.
Greene, J.C. ( 2007). Mixed methods in social inquiry: research methods for the social sciences. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
12.
Greene, J.C. ( 1997). Evaluation as advocacy. Evaluation Practice , 18, 25-35.
13.
Henry, G.T., & Mark, M.M. ( 2003). Toward an agenda for research on evaluation. New Directions for Evaluation, 97, 69-80.
Mark, M.M. ( 2008). Building a better evidence for evaluation theory: Beyond general calls to a framework of types of research on evaluation. In N. L. Smith & P. Brandon (Eds.), Fundamental issues in evaluation (p. 111-134). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
16.
Mark, M.M. ( 2003). Toward an integrative view of the theory and practice of program and policy evaluation. In S. I. Donaldson & M. Scriven (Eds.), Evaluating social program and problems: Visions for the new millennium (p. 183-204). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
17.
Mark, M.M. ( 2001). Evaluation’s future: Furor, futile, or fertile?American Journal of Evaluation, 22, 457-479.
18.
Mark, M.M., Henry, G.T., & Julnes, G. ( 2000). Evaluation: An integrated framework for understanding, guiding, and improving policies and programs. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.
19.
Mark, M.M., & Shotland, R.L. (1985). Stakeholder-based evaluation and value judgments. Evaluation Review, 9, 605-626.
20.
Mertens, D.M. ( 2009). Transformative research and evaluation. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
21.
Miller, R.L., & Campbell, R. ( 2006). Taking stock of empowerment evaluation: An empirical review. American Journal of Evaluation, 27, 296-319.
Ryan, K. E., & Schwandt, T. A. (Eds.). (2002). Exploring evaluator role and identity. Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
27.
Sanders, J.R. ( 2003). Mainstreaming evaluation. New Directions for Evaluation, 99, 3-6.
28.
Shadish, W.R. ( 1998). Evaluation theory is who we are. American Journal of Evaluation, 19, 1-19.
29.
Shadish, W.R., Cook, T.D., & Leviton, L.C. ( 1991). Foundations of program evaluation: Theories of practice . Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
30.
Shadish, W.R., & Epstein, R. ( 1987). Patterns of program evaluation practice among members of the Evaluation Research Society and Evaluation Network. Evaluation Review, 11, 555-590.
31.
Skolits, G., Morrow, J., & Burr, E. ( 2009). Evaluator responses to evaluation activities and demands: A re-conceptualization of evaluator roles. American Journal of Evaluation, 30, 275-295.
32.
Smith, N.L. ( 2007). Empowerment evaluation as ideology. American Journal of Evaluation, 28, 169-178.
33.
Smith, N.L. ( 1993). Improving evaluation theory through the empirical study of evaluation practice. Evaluation Practice, 14, 237-242.
34.
Smith, N.L. ( 1985). Adversary and committee hearings as evaluation models . Evaluation Review, 9, 735-750.
35.
Smith, N. L., & Brandon, P. (Eds.) (2008). Fundamental issues in evaluation. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
36.
Stevahn, L., King, J.A., Ghere, G., & Minnema, J. ( 2005). Establishing essential competencies for program evaluators . American Journal of Evaluation, 26, 43-59.
37.
Symonette, H. ( 2004). Walking pathways toward becoming a culturally competent evaluator: Boundaries, borderlands, and border crossings. New Directions for Evaluation, 102, 95-109.
38.
Vanderplaat, M. ( 1995). Beyond technique: Issues in evaluating for empowerment . Evaluation, 1, 81-96.
39.
Wholey, J. ( 1983). Evaluation and effective public management. Boston, MA: Little John.
40.
Williams, J.E. ( 1989). A numerically developed taxonomy of evaluation theory and practice. Evaluation Review, 13, 18-31.
41.
Worthen, B.R. ( 2001). Whither evaluation? That all depends. American Journal of Evaluation, 22, 409-418.