Connolly, P. (2005). Smart outsourcing for grantmakers (Occasional paper). New York: TCC Group.
2.
Fiore, R. N. (2004). Conflicts of interest in research involving human subjects. Retrieved September 11, 2005, from https://www.citiprogram.org/members/courseandexam/moduletext.asp?strKeyID=FF1F7751-3A2B-4ABA-9CCA-0554913151E4-543123
3.
Greene, J. C. (1992). A case study of evaluation auditing as metaevaluation. Evaluation and Program Planning, 15, 71-74.
4.
Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation. (1994). The program evaluation standards (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
5.
Kendall-Tackett, K. (2005). Section 1: Conducting an evaluability assessment. Retrieved September 10, 2005, from http://www.fourh.umn.edu/evaluation/family/Section1/Page-06.html
6.
Newman, D. L., & Brown, R. D. (1996). Applied ethics for program evaluation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
7.
Patton, M. Q. (1997). Utilization-focused evaluation: The new century text (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
8.
Stufflebeam, D. (1974). Metaevaluation (Occasional Paper No. 3). Kalamazoo: Western Michigan University Evaluation Center.
9.
Worthen, B. R., & Sanders, J. R. (1987). Educational evaluation: Alternative approaches and practical guidelines. New York: Longman.