There is a strong tendency for evidence-based approaches to social practices to view these practices as imperfect devices for delivering social services. Practices are regarded as in need of repair by evaluation (and research) that can deliver the necessary science-based solution to the problems of practice. This article presents a different view of practices as material and linguistic events in which activities and relationships are constituted and unfold in interaction and in which people change and develop, and it argues for restoring this view of practice to evaluation. The article discusses two different ways in which notions of evidence based, practice, and evaluation are related and suggests what a genuinely practice-oriented approach to evaluation entails.
Coulter, D., & Wiens, J. R. (2002). Educational judgment: Linking the actor and the spectator. Educational Researcher, 31(4), 15-25.
2.
Delandshere, G. (2002). Assessment as inquiry. Teachers College Record, 104, 1461-1484.
3.
Denvall, V. (2003, November). The problematic concept of implementing methodology—The case of social welfare evaluation in Sweden. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Evaluation Association, Reno, NV.
4.
Forester, J. (1999). The deliberative practitioner. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
5.
Hansson, J.-H. (2003, July). Promoting evidence based practice in social service and health care. Paper presented at the 11th annual European Social Services Conference, Venice, Italy. Available at www.socialeurope.com/pdfs/venice/presentation/hansson.pdf
6.
Kemmis, S. J. (2004, March). Knowing practice: Searching for saliences. Paper presented at the conference “Participant Knowledge and Knowing Practice,”Umeå University, Sweden.
7.
Kushner, S. (2000). Personalizing evaluation. London: Sage.
8.
Lave, J. (1996). The practice of learning. In S. Chaiklin & J. Lave (Eds.), Understanding practice: Perspectives on activity and context (pp. 3-32). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
9.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
10.
Lindbloom, C. E. (1990). Inquiry and change. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
11.
MacIntyre, A. (1981). After virtue. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
12.
Mullen, E. J. (2002, July). Evidence-based social work—Theory and practice: Historical and reflective perspective. Paper presented at the 4th International Conference on Evaluation for Practice, Tampere, Finland.
13.
Patton, M. Q. (1997). Utilization-focused evaluation: The new century text (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
14.
Prilleltensky, M. (2001). Values-based praxis in community psychology: Moving toward social justices and social action. American Journal of Community Psychology, 29, 747-778.
15.
Reckwitz, A. (2002). Toward a theory of social practices—A development in culturalist theorizing. European Journal of Social Theory, 5, 243-263.
16.
Sackett, D. L., Straus, S. E., Richardson, W. S., Rosenberg, W., & Haynes, R. B. (2000). Evidence-based medicine: How to practice and teach EBM (2nd ed.). New York: Churchill Livingstone.
17.
Sackett, D. L., Rosenberg, W. M., Gray, J. A., Haynes, R. B., & Richardson, W. S. (1966). Evidence-based medicine: What it is and what it isn’t. British Medical Journal, 312(7023), 71-72.
18.
Sanderson, I. (2003). Is it “what works” that matters? Evaluation and evidence-based policy-making. Research Papers in Education, 18, 331-345.
19.
Saugstad, T. (2002). Educational theory and practice in an Aristotelian perspective. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 46, 373-390.
20.
Schwandt, T. A. (2002). Evaluation practice reconsidered. New York: Peter Lang.
21.
Schwandt, T. A. (2004). Evaluating holistic rehabilitation praxis. Oslo, Norway: Kommuneforlaget AS.
22.
Shotter, J. (1996). “Now I can go on:” Wittgenstein and our embodied embeddedness in the “hurly-burly” of life. Human Studies, 19, 385-407.
23.
Van Manen, M. (1999). The practice of practice. In M. Lange, J. Olson, H. Hansen, & W. Bünder (Eds.), Changing schools/changing practices: Perspectives on educational reform and teacher professionalism. Louvain, Belgium: Garant.
