Alkin, M. C. (Ed.) (1990). Evaluation debates. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
2.
Alkin, M. C., & Christie, C. A. (2004). An evaluation theory tree. In M. C. Alkin (Ed.), Evaluation roots: Tracing theorists’ views and influences (pp. 12-65). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
3.
Alkin, M. C., & Coyle, K. (1988). Thoughts on evaluation misutilization. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 14, 331-340.
4.
American Evaluation Association, Task Force on Guiding Principles for Evaluators (1995). Guiding Principles for Evaluators. In W. R. Shadish, D. L. Newman, M. A. Scheirer, & C. Wye (Eds.), Guiding Principles for Evaluators (New Directions for Program Evaluation, No. 66, pp. 19-26). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
5.
Christie, C. A., & Alkin, M. C. (1999). Further reflections on evaluation misutilization. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 25, 1-10.
6.
Datta, L.-E. (2002). The case of the uncertain bridge. American Journal of Evaluation, 23, 187-197.
7.
Henry, G. T., & Mark, M. M. (2003). Beyond use: Understanding evaluation’s influence on attitudes and actions. American Journal of Evaluation, 24, 293-314.
8.
House, E. (1995). Principled evaluation: A critique of the AEA guiding principles. In W. R. Shadish, D. Newman, M. A. Scheirer, & C. Wye (Eds.), Guiding Principles for Evaluators. (New Directions for Program Evaluation, No. 66, pp. 27-34). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
9.
Kirkhart, K. (2000). Reconceptualizing evaluation use: An integrated theory of influence. In V. Caracelli & H. Preskill (Eds.), The expanding scope of evaluation use (New Directions for Evaluation, No. 88, pp. 5-24). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
10.
Mark, M. M., & Henry, G. T. (2004). The mechanisms and outcomes of evaluation influence. Evaluation, 10, 35-57.
11.
Patton, M. Q. (1988). Six honest serving men. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 14, 301-330.
12.
Patton, M. Q. (1997). Utilization-focused evaluation: The new century text (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
13.
Shulha, L. M., & Cousins, J. B. (1997). Evaluation use: Theory, research and practice since 1986. American Journal of Evaluation, 18, 195-208.
14.
Smith, N. (1998). Professional reasons for declining an evaluation contract. American Journal of Evaluation, 19, 177-190.
15.
Smith, N. (2002). An analysis of ethical challenges in evaluation. American Journal of Evaluation, 23, 199-206.
16.
Weiss, C. H. (1988). Evaluation for decisions: Is anybody there? Does anybody care?Evaluation Practice, 9(1), 5-19.
17.
Weiss, C. H. (1991). Evaluation research in the political context: Sixteen years and four administrations later. In M. W. McLaughlin & D. C. Phillips (Eds.), Evaluation and education: At quarter century (pp. 211-231). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.