Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Values inquiry refers to systematic investigation of the values relevant to a program, including understanding those outcomes most prized by stakeholders. Although much attention has been given to stakeholder involvement, the literature on value inquiries per se as an approach is limited. This paper demonstrates how several of the steps used in the ATM approach to developing logic models [Am. J. Eval. 23 (2002) 493] are congruent with the tenets of values inquiry and can serve to advance values inquiry methodology. Using a case study approach, we describe how interview and deliberative approaches were combined to prioritize a large number of potential outcomes for a coalition of agencies working toward the same goal. Successes and challenges in understanding the application of the ATM approach to furthering the development of values inquiry methods are offered.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Fink, A. (1993). Evaluation fundamentals: Guiding health programs, research, and policy. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

Green, L. W. , & Kreuter, M. W. (1999). Health promotion planning: An educational and ecological approach (3rd ed.). Mountain View: Mayfield.

Lewis, D. R. , Johnson, D. R. , & Braddock, D. L. (2000). Participatory evaluation for special education and rehabilitation. Washington, DC: American Association on Mental Retardation.

Lincoln, Y. , & Guba, E. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

Mark, M. M. (2003). Program evaluation. In S. A. Schinka & W. Velicer (Eds.), Comprehensive handbook of psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 323-347). New York: Wiley.

Mark, M. M. , Henry, G. T. , & Julnes, G. (2000). Evaluation: An integrated framework for understanding, guiding, and improving policies and programs. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Patton, M. Q. (1997). Utilization-focused evaluation: The new century text. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Posavac, E. J. , & Carey, R. G. (1997). Program evaluation: Methods and case studies (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River: Prentice-Hall.

Renger, R. , & Titcomb, A. (2002). A three-step approach to teaching logic models. American Journal of Evaluation, 23, 493-503.

10.

Sanders, J. R. (1994). The program evaluation standards (2nd ed.). The Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

11.

Weiss, C. H. (1983). The stakeholder approach to evaluation: Origins and promise. In A. S. Bryk (Ed.), Stakeholder-based evaluation (pp. 3-14). New Directions for Program Evaluation, No. 17. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

12.

Wener, R. E. (1988). Doing it right: Examples of successful application of environment-behavior research. Journal of Architectural and Planning Research, 5(4), 284-303.

13.

Wholey, J. S. (1994). Assessing the feasibility and likely usefulness of evaluation. In J. S. Wholey , H. P. Hatry , & K. E. Newcomer (Eds.), Handbook of practical program evaluation (pp. 15-39). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Strategies for Values Inquiry: An Exploratory Case Study

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References