American Evaluation Association, Task Force on Guiding Principles for Evaluators. (1995). Guiding principles for evaluators. In W. R. Shadish, D. L. Newman, M. A. Scheirer, & C. Wye (Eds.), Guiding principles for evaluators. New directions for program evaluation (no. 66, pp. 19-26). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
2.
Campbell, M., & McClintock, C. (2002). Shall we dance? Program evaluation meets OD in the nonprofit sector. OD Practitioner, 34(4), 3-7.
3.
Hendricks, M. (2001). Commentary: Dear Eva. American Journal of Evaluation, 22, 108-110.
4.
Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation. (1994). The program evaluation standards (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
5.
Marquart, J. M., & Konrad, E. L. (1996). (Eds.). Evaluating initiatives to integrate human services.New directions for program evaluation (no. 69). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
6.
McClintock, C. (2003). The scholar-practitioner. In A. Di Stefano, K. Rudestam, & R. Silverman (Eds.), Encyclopedia of distributed learning. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
7.
McClintock, C. (1986). Toward a theory of formative evaluation. In D. S. Cordray & M. W. Lipsey (Eds.), Evaluation studies review annual (Vol. 11, pp. 205-223). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
8.
McClintock, C., & Lowe, S. T. (2001). Welfare reform and its enduring questions: What have we learned from evaluation research? In G. Julnes & E. M. Foster (Eds.), Outcomes of welfare reform for families who leave TANF. New directions for program evaluation (no. 91, pp. 9-20). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
