Book Review: Transparency,Stakeholder Involvement,and Explanation in Contemporary Evaluation: A Review Essay Stimulated by “Success in Early Intervention: The Chicago Child-Parent Centers”
Restricted accessReview articleFirst published online June, 2002
Book Review: Transparency,Stakeholder Involvement,and Explanation in Contemporary Evaluation: A Review Essay Stimulated by “Success in Early Intervention: The Chicago Child-Parent Centers”
American Evaluation Association, Task Force on Guiding Principles for Evaluators. (1994). Guiding principles for evaluators, New Directions for Program Evaluation (Vol. 66, pp. 19-26). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
2.
Advisory Committee on Head Start Research and Evaluation. (1999). Evaluating head start: A recommended framework for studying the impact of the head start program. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
3.
Barnett, W. (1995). Long-term effects of early childhood programs on cognitive and school outcomes. The Future of Children, 5, 25-49.
4.
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
5.
Datta, L. (1983). A tale of two studies: The Westinghouse-Ohio evaluation of project head start and the consortium. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
6.
Entwisle, D. (1995). The role of schools in sustaining early childhood program benefits. The Future of Children, 5(1), 133-144.
7.
Fitzpatrick, J. (2000). Dialogue with Gary Henry. American Journal of Evaluation, 21, 108-117.
8.
General Accounting Office (1997). Education and care: Early childhood programs and services for low-income families. Washington, DC.
9.
Gilliam, W. S., Ripple, C. H., Zigler, E. F., & Leiter, V. (2000). Evaluating child and family demonstration initiatives: Lessons from the comprehensive child development program. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 15(1), 41-59.
10.
Gilliam, W. S., & Zigler, E. F. (2000). A critical meta-analysis of all evaluations of state-funded preschool from 1977 to 1998: Implications for policy, service delivery, and program evaluation. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 15, 441-472.
11.
Gomby, D. S., Culross, P. L., & Behrman, R. E. (1999). Home visiting: Recent program evaluations-analysis and recommendations. The Future of Children, 9, 4-24.
12.
Henry, G. T. (1996). Does the public have a role in evaluation? Surveys and democratic discourse. In M. T. Braverman & J. K. Slater (Eds.), Advances in Survey Research, New Directions for Program Evaluation (Vol. 70, pp. 3-15). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
13.
Henry, G. T. (2002). Choosing criteria to judge program success: A values inquiry. Evaluation: The International Journal of Theory, Research and Practice.
14.
Henry, G. T., Dickey, K. C., & Areson, J. C. (1991). Stakeholder participation in educational performance monitoring. Education Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 13(2), 177-188.
15.
Henry, G. T., & Julnes, G. (1998). Values and Realist Evaluation. In G. T. Henry, G. Julnes, & M.M. Mark (Eds.), Realist Evaluation, New Directions for Program Evaluation (Vol. 78, pp. 53-72). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
16.
Mark, M. M., Henry, G. T., & Julnes, G. (2000). Evaluation: An integrated framework for understanding, guiding, and improving policies and programs. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
17.
Milstein, R. L., & Wetterhall, S. F. (1999). Framework for program evaluation in public health. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. MMWR 1999; 48 (no. RR-11).
18.
Moffitt, R. A., & Ver Ploeg, M. (Eds.) (2001). Evaluating welfare reform in an era of transition. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
19.
Patton, M. Q. (1997). Utilization-focused evaluation: The new century text (3rd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
20.
Reynolds, A. J. (1998). Confirmatory program evaluation: A method for strengthening casual inference. American Journal of Evaluation, 19(2), 203-221.
21.
Reynolds, A. J. (2000). Success in early intervention: The Chicago Child-Parent Centers. Lincoln, NE. University Nebraska Press.
22.
Reynolds, A. J., Temple, J. A., Robertson, D. L., & Mann, E. A. (2001). Long-term effects of an early childhood intervention on educational achievement and juvenile arrest. JAMA, 285, 2339-2346.
23.
Rogers, P. J., Petrosino, A., Huebner, T. A., & Hasci, T. A. (2000). In P. J. Rogers, T. A. Hasci, A. Petrosino, & T. A. Huebner (Eds.), Program theory evaluation: Practice, promise, and problems, Program theory in evaluation: Challenges and Opportunities, New Directions for Program Evaluation (Vol. 87, pp. 5-13). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
24.
Schweinhart, L. J., & Weikart, D. P. (1997). The High/scope preschool curriculum comparison study through age 23. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 12, 117-143.
25.
Steele, F., Amin, S., & Naved, R. T. (1998). The impact of an integrated micro-credit program on women’s empowerment and fertility behavior in rural Bangladesh. The Population Council, 115, 1-39.
26.
Stufflebeam, D. L. (2000). Foundational models for 21st century program evaluation, New Directions for Program Evaluation (Vol. 89). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
27.
The Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation. (1994). The Program Evaluation Standards (2nd ed.). How to assess evaluations of educational programs. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.