Affholter, D. P. (2000). Commentary: Serious problems?American Journal of Evaluation, 21, 373-380.
2.
Barrington, G. (1999). Commentary: When management changes: Advice for a young evaluator. American Journal of Evaluation, 20, 377-380.
3.
Berstene, T. G. (1999). Commentary: Process is important. American Journal of Evaluation, 20, 116-118.
4.
Bonnet, D. G. (1998). Commentary: Achieving the untroubled slumber. American Journal of Evaluation, 19, 230-232.
5.
Cooksy, L. (2000). Commentary: Auditing the off-the-record case. American Journal of Evaluation, 21, 122-128.
6.
Davis, J. E. (1999). Commentary: Advocacy, care, and power. American Journal of Evaluation, 20, 119-122.
7.
Eastmond, N. (1998). Commentary: When funders want to compromise your design. American Journal of Evaluation, 19, 392-395.
8.
Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation. (1994). The program evaluation standards (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
9.
Knott, T. D. (2000). Commentary: It’s illegal and unethical. American Journal of Evaluation, 21, 129-130.
10.
Konrad, E. L. (2000). Commentary: Alleviating the fears of the anxious administrator. American Journal of Evaluation, 21, 264-268.
11.
Mathison, S. (1998). Commentary: It depends on what you think you are doing. American Journal of Evaluation, 19, 74-78.
12.
Mathison, S. (1999). Rights, responsibilities, and duties: A comparison of ethics for internal and external evaluators. In J. L. Fitzpatrick & M. Morris (Eds.), Current and emerging ethical challenges in evaluation (New Directions for Evaluation, No. 82, pp. 25-34). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
13.
McKillip, J. (2000). Commentary: Negative findings then, negative consequences now?American Journal of Evaluation, 21, 381-382.
14.
Morris, M. (1998a). Ethical challenges. American Journal of Evaluation, 19, 71-72.
15.
Morris, M. (1998b). Ethical challenges. American Journal of Evaluation, 19, 381-382.
16.
Morris, M. (2000). Ethical challenges. American Journal of Evaluation, 21, 119-120.
17.
Morris, M., & Cohn, R. (1993). Program evaluators and ethical challenges: A national survey. Evaluation Review, 17, 621-642.
18.
Owen, J. M. (1999). Commentary: Senior-serve: An ethical case study. American Journal of Evaluation, 20, 374-376.
19.
Posavac, E. J. (1999). Commentary: Can we help Gee-Gaws stay a family?American Journal of Evaluation, 20, 585-589.
20.
Russ-Eft, D. (1999). Commentary: Can this evaluation be saved?American Journal of Evaluation, 20, 590-597.
21.
Scheirer, M. A. (1998). Commentary: Evaluation planning is the heart of the matter. American Journal of Evaluation, 19, 385-391.
22.
Schwandt, T. A. (1998). Commentary: Moral demands and strong evaluation. American Journal of Evaluation, 19, 227-229.
23.
Shadish, W. R., Newman, D. L., Scheirer, M. A., & Wye, C. (Eds.). (1995). Guiding principles for evaluators (New Directions for Program Evaluation, No. 66). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
