Affholter, D. P. (2000). Commentary: Serious problems?American Journal of Evaluation, 21, 373-380.
2.
American Evaluation Association, Task Force on Guiding Principles for Evaluators. (1995). Guiding principles for evaluators. In W. R. Shadish, D. L. Newman, M. A. Scheirer, & C. Wye (Eds.), Guiding principles for evaluators. New Directions for Program Evaluation, 66 (p. 19-26). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
3.
Barrington, G. (1999). Commentary: When management changes: Advice for a young evaluator. American Journal of Evaluation, 20, 377-380.
4.
Berstene, T. G. (1999). Commentary: Process is important. American Journal of Evaluation, 20, 116-118.
5.
Bonnet, D. G. (1998). Commentary: Achieving the untroubled slumber. American Journal of Evaluation, 19, 230-232.
6.
Cooksy, L. (2000). Commentary: Auditing the off-the-record case. American Journal of Evaluation, 21, 122-128.
7.
Davis, J. E. (1999). Commentary: Advocacy, care, and power. American Journal of Evaluation, 20, 119-122.
8.
Eastmond, N. (1998). Commentary: When funders want to compromise your design. American Journal of Evaluation, 19, 392-395.
9.
Grasso, P. G. (1999). Meta-evaluation of an evaluation of Reader Focused Writing for the Veterans Benefits Administration. American Journal of Evaluation, 20, 355-370.
10.
Hendricks, M. (2001). Commentary: Dear Eva. American Journal of Evaluation, 22, 108-110.
11.
House, E. R., & Howe, K. R. (1998). The issue of advocacy in evaluations. American Journal of Evaluation, 19, 233-236.
12.
Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation. (1994). The program evaluation standards (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
13.
Knott, T. D. (2000). Commentary: It’s illegal and unethical. American Journal of Evaluation, 21, 129-130.
14.
Konrad, E. L. (2000). Commentary: Alleviating the fears of the anxious administrator. American Journal of Evaluation, 21, 264-268.
15.
Mabry, L. (1999). Circumstantial ethics. American Journal of Evaluation, 20, 199-212.
16.
Mark, M. M., Henry, G. T., & Julnes, G. (2000). Evaluation: An integrated framework for understanding, guiding and improving policies and programs. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
17.
Mathison, S. (1998). Commentary: It depends on what you think you are doing. American Journal of Evaluation, 19, 74-78.
18.
McKillip, J. (2000). Commentary: Negative findings then, negative consequences now?American Journal of Evaluation, 21, 381-382.
19.
Morris, M. (1998a). The downside report. American Journal of Evaluation, 19, 73.
20.
Morris, M. (1998b). The opportunity. American Journal of Evaluation, 19, 225-226.
21.
Morris, M. (1998c). The design. American Journal of Evaluation, 19, 383-384.
22.
Morris, M. (1999a). The case of the desperate staff, American Journal of Evaluation, 20, 115.
23.
Morris, M. (1999b). The pilot’s demise?American Journal of Evaluation, 20, 372-373.
24.
Morris, M. (1999c). The good news at Gee-Gaws. American Journal of Evaluation, 20, 584.
25.
Morris, M. (2000a). The off-the-record case. American Journal of Evaluation, 21, 121.
26.
Morris, M. (2000b). The case of the sensitive survey. American Journal of Evaluation, 21, 263.
27.
Morris, M. (2000c). Bygones?American Journal of Evaluation, 21, 371-372.
28.
Morris, M. (2001). Who is building this boat, anyway?American Journal of Evaluation, 22, 107.
29.
Owen, J. M. (1999). Commentary: Senior-serve: An ethical case study. American Journal of Evaluation, 20, 374-376.
30.
Posavac, E. J. (1999). Commentary: Can we help Gee-Gaws stay a family?American Journal of Evaluation, 20, 585-589.
31.
Russ-Eft, D. (1999). Commentary: Can this evaluation be saved?American Journal of Evaluation, 20, 590-597.
32.
Scheirer, M. A. (1998). Commentary: Evaluation planning is the heart of the matter. American Journal of Evaluation, 19, 385-391.
33.
Schwandt, T. A. (1998). Commentary: Moral demands and strong evaluation. American Journal of Evaluation, 19, 227-229.
34.
Shulha, L. M. (2001). Commentary: Tinker, tailor, soldier, sailor: The evaluator role in high stakes program design. American Journal of Evaluation, 22, 111-115.
35.
Smith, N. L. (1998). Professional reasons for declining an evaluation contract. American Journal of Evaluation, 19, 177-190.
36.
Stufflebeam, D. K. (2000). Lessons in contracting for evaluations. American Journal of Evaluation, 21, 293-314.
37.
Thomas, C. L. (2000). Commentary: Politics, context, and integrity. American Journal of Evaluation, 21, 269-273.
