Affholter, D. P. (2000). Commentary: Serious problems?American Journal of Evaluation, 21, 373-380.
2.
Barrington, G. (1999). Commentary: When management changes: Advice for a young evaluator. American Journal of Evaluation, 20, 377-380.
3.
Berstene, T. G. (1999). Commentary: Process is important. American Journal of Evaluation, 20, 116-118.
4.
Bonnet, D. G. (1998). Commentary: Achieving the untroubled slumber. American Journal of Evaluation, 19, 230-232.
5.
Cooksy, L. (2000). Commentary: Auditing the off-the-record case. American Journal of Evaluation, 21, 122-128.
6.
Davis, J. E. (1999). Commentary: Advocacy, care, and power. American Journal of Evaluation, 20, 119-122.
7.
Eastmond, N. (1998). Commentary: When funders want to compromise your design. American Journal of Evaluation, 19, 392-395.
8.
Hendricks, M. (2001). Commentary: Dear Eva. American Journal of Evaluation, 22, 108-110.
9.
Knott, T. D. (2000). Commentary: It’s illegal and unethical. American Journal of Evaluation, 21, 129-130.
10.
Konrad, E. L. (2000). Commentary: Alleviating the fears of the anxious administrator. American Journal of Evaluation, 21, 264-268.
11.
Mathison, S. (1998). Commentary: It depends on what you think you are doing. American Journal of Evaluation, 19, 74-78.
12.
McKillip, J. (2000). Commentary: Negative findings then, negative consequences now?American Journal of Evaluation, 21, 381-382.
13.
Owen, J. M. (1999). Commentary: Senior-serve: An ethical case study. American Journal of Evaluation, 20, 374-376.
14.
Posavac, E. J. (1999). Commentary: Can we help Gee-Gaws stay a family?American Journal of Evaluation, 20, 585-589.
15.
Russ-Eft, D. (1999). Commentary: Can this evaluation be saved?American Journal of Evaluation, 20, 590-597.
16.
Scheirer, M. A. (1998). Commentary: Evaluation planning is the heart of the matter. American Journal of Evaluation, 19, 385-391.
17.
Schwandt, T. A. (1998). Commentary: Moral demands and strong evaluation. American Journal of Evaluation, 19, 227-229.
18.
Shulha, L. M. (2001). Commentary: Tinker, tailor, soldier, sailor: The evaluator role in high stakes program design. American Journal of Evaluation, 22, 111-115.
19.
Thomas, C. L. (2000). Commentary: Politics, context, and integrity. American Journal of Evaluation, 21, 269-273.
20.
Morris, M. (1998a). The downside report. American Journal of Evaluation, 19, 73.
21.
Morris, M. (1998b). The opportunity. American Journal of Evaluation, 19, 225-226.
22.
Morris, M. (1998c). The design. American Journal of Evaluation, 19, 383-384.
23.
Morris, M. (1999a). The case of the desperate staff, American Journal of Evaluation, 20, 115.
24.
Morris, M. (1999b). The pilot’s demise?American Journal of Evaluation, 20, 372-373.
25.
Morris, M. (1999c). The good news at Gee-Gaws. American Journal of Evaluation, 20, 584.
26.
Morris, M. (2000a). The off-the-record case. American Journal of Evaluation, 21, 121.
27.
Morris, M. (2000b). The case of the sensitive survey. American Journal of Evaluation, 21, 263.
28.
Morris, M. (2000c). Bygones?American Journal of Evaluation, 21, 371-372.
29.
Morris, M. (2001). Who is building this boat, anyway?American Journal of Evaluation, 22, 107.
