Evaluator as Steward of Citizen Deliberation

Abstract

I suggest that evaluators have much to offer in being stewards of citizen deliberation during the conduct of evaluative inquiry, especially in regards to the professional community’s guiding principle of “Responsibility to the general and public welfare.” The deliberative forum is reviewed as one evaluation methodology for bringing the theory of deliberative democratic evaluation into practice. The paper offers a number of reflections from the field based on my experiences of adopting a stewardship role during my evaluation practice. These include: (1) working with the tacit program culture, (2) consciousness of risk, (3) creating dissonance, (4) the role of coaching, and (5) sustaining deliberation in program communities. Examples are offered in thinking about constructing deliberative forums throughout evaluation processes in practical contexts. The paper positions evaluation practice as an important mechanism for contributing toward a civil society and asks evaluators to consider their role in being stewards of citizen deliberation.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

American Evaluation Association . (1995). Task force on guiding principles for evaluators. In W. R. Shadish , D. L. Newman , M. A. Scheirer , & C. Wye (Eds.), Guiding principles for evaluators (Vol. 66, pp. 19-26). New Directions for Program Evaluation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Bellah, N. , Madsen, R. , Sullivan, W. , Swidler, A. , & Tipton, S. (1985). Habits of the heart. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

Bohman, J. (1996). Public deliberation. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

Erikson, E. H. (1950). Childhood and society (2nd ed.). NY: Norton & Company Inc.

Greene, J. C. (1997). Evaluation as advocacy. Evaluation Practice, 18, 25-35.

Guba, E. G. , & Lincoln, Y. S. (1989). Fourth generation evaluation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

Hanberger, A. (2001). Policy evaluation, civil society, and democracy. American Journal of Evaluation, 22.

House, E. , & Howe, K. R. (1999). Values in evaluation and social research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Joyce, M. S. (1994). Citizenship in the 21st century: individual self-government. In D. E. Ederly (Ed.), Building a community of citizens (pp. 3-10). Lanham, MD: University Press of America Inc.

10.

MacNeil, C. (1999). The integrity of evaluation. Doctoral dissertation, University at Albany. Dissertation Abstracts International.

11.

MacNeil C. (2000). Surfacing the realpolitik: democratic evaluation in an antidemocratic climate. In K. Ryan , & L. DeStefano (Eds.), Evaluation as a democratic practice: inclusion, dialogue and deliberation (Vol. 85, pp. 51-62). New directions for evaluation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

12.

MacNeil, C. (2000). The pros and cons of poetic representation in evaluation reporting. American Journal of Evaluation, 21, 359-367.

13.

MacNeil C. , & Mathison, S. (2000). Creating deliberative forums: making participatory evaluation work.!A Professional Development Seminar of the American Evaluation Association. Hawaii: Oahu.

14.

Mathison, S. (1994). Rethinking the evaluator role. Evaluation and Program Planning, 17, 299-304.

15.

Morse, S. W. (1998). Five building blocks for successful communities. In F. Hesselbein , M. Goldsmith , R. Beckard , & R. F. Schubert (Eds.), The community of the future. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

16.

Piaget, J. (1950). The Psychology of intelligence. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

17.

Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone. New York: Simon & Schuster.

18.

Ryan, K. , & DeStefano, L. (Eds.). (2000). Evaluation as a democratic practice: inclusion, dialogue and deliberation (Vol. 58). New directions for evaluation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

19.

Schwandt, T.S. (1989). Recapturing moral discourse in evaluation. Educational Researcher, 18, 11-16.

20.

Selznick, P. (1998). Social justice: a communitarian perspective. In A. Etzioni (Ed.), The Essential communitarian reader (pp. 61-72). Oxford: Rowan and Littlefield Publishers Inc.

21.

Strecker, T. (2000). Safer in the street: a video poem. New York, NY: The National Arts Club.

22.

Thomas, R. M. (1995). Comparing theories of child development (4th ed.). New York: Brookes/Cole Publishing.

23.

Tocqueville, A. (2000). Democracy in America. New York: Bantam Books.

24.

Vanier, J. (1979). Community and growth. Toronto, CA: Griffin Press.

25.

Weiss, C. H. (1998). Evaluation (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

26.

Wood, D. , Bruner, J. , & Ross, S. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. British Journal of Psychology, 66, 181-191.