The analyses presented in this article are based on the authors’ experiences over the past 5 years evaluating community initiatives located in several low-income, California Latino communities. The dynamic interactions between major stakeholder groups including funders, community-based organization staff, community members, and evaluators are examined through a context-sensitive lens. A case study of El Centro Familiar provides a vehicle for presenting our roles as an interpreters, translators, mediators, and storytellers. The challenges of blending a critical theory social science approach with community-focused evaluation practice form the basis of the discussion.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
The Aspen Institute. (1997). Voices from the field: learning from the early work of Comprehensive Community Initiatives. Washington DC: The Aspen Institute.
2.
Banks-Wallace, J. (1998). The emancipatory potential of storytelling in groups. The Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 30, 17-21.
3.
Barbash, I., & Taylor, L. (1997). Cross-cultural filmaking. Berkeley: University of California Press.
4.
Barone, T. E. (1992). Beyond theory and method: a case of critical storytelling. Theory into Practice, 31, 142-146.
5.
Brindis, C, & Clayson, Z. (1999). Final evaluation report: the San Francisco Foundation Lifeline Initiative. San Francisco, CA: The San Francisco Foundation.
6.
Brindis, C., Peacock, E., & Clayson, Z. (1998). Final local evaluation report: Oakland Healthy Start, summary report October 1993—September 1997. Oakland, CA: The Alameda County Health Care Services Agency.
7.
Charmaz, K. (2000). Grounded theory: objectivist and constructivist methods. In N. K. Denzin, & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed.) (pp. 509-536). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
8.
Clayson, Z., & Sanchez, E. (1998). Year one evaluation report: the Communities 2000 Initiative. Los Altos, CA: The David and Lucile Packard Foundation.
9.
Clayson, Z., & Sanchez, E. (2000). Year two evaluation report: Communities 2000 Initiative. Los Altos, CA: The David and Lucile Packard Foundation.
10.
Cobb, S. (1976). Social support as a moderator of life stress. Psychosomatic Medicine, 300-314.
11.
Coburn, D. (2000). Income inequality, social cohesion and the health status of populations: the role of neoliberalism. Social Science and Medicine, 51, 135-146.
12.
Cohen, L. (1979). Culture, disease and stress among Latino immigrants. Washington DC: Smithsonian Institute.
13.
Denzin, D. K. (1994). The art and politics of interpretation. In N. K. Denzin, & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 500-515). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
14.
Ferroni, M. (2000). Reforming foreign aid and the role of international public goods. World Bank Operations Evaluation Department, OED Working Paper Series No. 4. Washington, DC: The World Bank.
15.
Fetterman, D. M., Kaftarian, S. J., & Wandersman, A. E. (1996). Empowerment evaluation: knowledge and tools for self-assessment & accountability. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
16.
Greene, J. C. (1994). Qualitative program evaluation: practice and promise. In N. K. Denzin, & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 530-544). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
17.
Greene, J. C. (1997). Evaluation as advocacy. Evaluation Practice, 18, 25-35.
18.
Greider, W. (1997). One world ready or not: the manic logic of global capitalism. New York City: Simon and Schuster.
19.
Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1989). Fourth generation evaluation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
20.
Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
21.
Hamilton, N., & Chinchilla-Stoltz, N. S. (1991). Central American migration: a framework for analysis. Latin American Research Review, 6, 75-110.
22.
Hayes-Bautista, D. (1997). The health status of Latinos in California. Oakland, CA: The California Endowment and the California HealthCare Foundation.
23.
Held, D. M., Goldblatt, D., & Perraton, J. (1999). Global transformations: politics, economics and culture. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
24.
Hertzler, J. (1965). Sociology of language. New York: Random House.
25.
Hopson, R. (2001). Cross-border conversations on culture and social justice in evaluation. American Journal of Evaluation, 22, 58-72.
26.
Juhasz, A. (1995). AIDS TV: identity, community and alternative video. North Carolina: Duke University Press.
27.
Kawachi, I., & Kennedy, B. P. (1997). Socioeconomic determinants of health: health and social cohesion: why care about income inequality?British Medical Journal, 314, 1037.
28.
Keefe, S., Padila, A., & Carolos, M. (1979). The Mexican-American extended family as an emotional support system. Human Organization. New York: Random House.
29.
W. K. Kellogg Foundation (1998). Evaluation handbook. Battle Creek, Michigan: W. K. Kellogg Foundation.
30.
Kearney, M. (1995). Borders and boundaries of the state and self at the end of the empire. In R. Altamirano, & L. Ryo-Hirabayashhi (Eds.), Migrants, regional identities and Latin American cities (pp. 151-168). Arlington, Virginia: American Anthropological Association.
31.
Kearney M., & Nagensgast, C. (1989). Anthropological perspectives on transnational communities in rural California. Davis, CA: California Institute for Rural Studies.
32.
Kincheloe, J., & McLaren, P. (2000). Rethinking critical theory and qualitative research. In N. Denzin, & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed.) (pp. 279-314). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
33.
MacNeil, C. (2002). Evaluator as steward of citizen deliberation. American Journal of Evaluation, 23, 75-92.
34.
Maddison, A. (1995). Monitoring the world economy 1820-1922. Paris, France: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.
35.
Mertens, D. (1999). Inclusive evaluation: implications of transformative theory for evaluation. American Journal of Evaluation, 20, 1-14.
36.
Moore, J. (1970). Mexican-American. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Picciotto, R. (2000). The economics of evaluation. Paper presented at the European Evaluation Society’s 4th Annual Conference. Lausanne, Switzerland, October 12, 2000.
39.
Rosenthal, A. (1996). Writing, directing and producing documentary films and videos. Illinois: Southern Illinois University Press.
40.
Rouse, R. (1995). Questions of identity: personhood and collectivity in transnational migration to the U.S. Critique of Anthropology, 15, 351-380.
41.
Rundall, T., Castaneda, X., & Clayson, Z. (2000). Final report: evaluation of first things first. Oakland, CA: California HealthCare Foundation.
42.
Sabogal, F., Marin, G., & Otero-Sabogal, R. (1987). Hispanic familism and acculturation: what changes and what doesn’t. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 9, 397-412.
43.
Sack, W. (2000). Navigating very large-scale conversations. Paper presented at the conference, Shaping the Network Society: The Future of the Public Sphere in Cyberspace. Seattle, Washington, May 2000.
44.
Schwandt, T. (1997). Reading the problem of evaluation in social inquiry. Qualitative Inquiry, 3, 4-25.
45.
Scriven, M. (1983). Evaluation ideologies. In G. F. Madaus, M. S. Scriven, & D. L. Stufflebeam (Eds.), Evaluation models (pp. 229-260). Boston, MA: Kluwer.
46.
Scriven, M. (1994). The final synthesis. Evaluation Practice, 15, 367-382.
47.
Trinh, T. (1989). Women, native, other. Indiana: Indiana University Press.
48.
Trinh, T. (1992). Framer framed. New York: Routeledge Press.
49.
Trinh, T. (1999). Cinema interval. New York: Routeledge Press.
50.
Walter, C. L. (1998). Community building practice: a conceptual framework. In M. Minkler (Ed.), Community organizing and community building for health (pp. 68-83). New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers Univesity Press.
51.
Weiss, C. (1970). The politicization of evaluation research. Journal of Social Issues, 26, 57-68.
52.
Weiss, C. (1972). Evaluation action programs: readings in social action and education. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
53.
Weiss, C. (1987). Where politics and evaluation research meet. In D. J. Palumbo (Ed.), The politics of program evaluation (pp. 47-50). Newbury Park: Sage Publications.
54.
Weiss, C. (1998). Evaluation. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
