The Aspen Institute. (1999) The Aspen Institute roundtable on comprehensive community initiatives. Available at: http://www.aspenroundtable.org.
2.
Chelimsky, E. (1992). Executive branch evaluation: An upturn soon? In C. G. Wye & R. C. Sonnischen (Eds.), Evaluation in the federal government: Changes, trends, opportunities. New Directions in Program Evaluation, Number 55 (pp. 29-36). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
3.
Ginsburg, A. (1992). Meeting the market for quality evaluation in education. In C. G. Wye & R. C. Sonnichsen (Eds.), Evaluation in the federal government: Changes, trends, opportunities. New Directions for Program Evaluation, Number 55 (pp. 37-46). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
4.
Mark, M. M., Henry, G. T., & Julnes, G. (2000). Evaluation: An integrated framework for understanding, guiding and improving policies and programs. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
5.
Russon, C., & Russon, K. (2000). International programme evaluation. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
6.
Sechrest, L. (1994). Program evaluation: Oh what it seemed to be. Evaluation Practice, 15, 359-366.
7.
Trumbo, C. W., Sprecker, K. J., Dumlao, R. J., Yun, R. G., & Duker, S. (2001). Use of E-mail and the Web by science writers. Science Communication, 22, 347-378.
8.
Wholey, J. S. (1997). Clarifying goals: Reporting results. In D. J. Rog & D. Fournier (Eds.), Progress and future directions in evaluation: Perspectives on theory, practice and methods. New Directions for Evaluation, Number 76 (pp. 95-106). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
