Alkin, M. C. (1980). Naturalistic study of evaluation utilization. New Directions for Program Evaluation, 5, 19-27.
2.
Alkin, M., Daillak, R., & White, P. (1979). Using evaluations: Does evaluation make a difference?Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
3.
Argyris, C. (1992). On organizational learning. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
4.
Argyris, C., & Schon, D. A. (1996). Organizational learning II. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
5.
Brandon, P. R. (1998). Stakeholder participation for the purpose of helping ensure evaluation validity: Bridging the gap between collaborative and non-collaborative evaluations. American Journal of Evaluation, 19, 325-337.
6.
Brett, B., Hill-Mead, L., & Wu, S. (2000). Perspectives on evaluation use and demand by users: The case of City Year. New Directions for Program Evaluation, 88, 71-83.
7.
Brunner, I., & Guzman, A. (1989). Participatory evaluation: A tool to assess projects and empower people. New Directions for Program Evaluation, 42, 9-17.
8.
Chelimsky, E. (1986). What have we learned about the politics of program evaluation?Evaluation Practice, 8, 5-21.
9.
Cousins, J. B., Donohue, J. J., & Bloom, G. A. (1996). Collaborative evaluation in North America: Evaluators’ self-reported opinions, practices, and consequences. Evaluation Practice, 17, 207-226.
10.
Cousins, J. B., & Earl, L. E. (1992). The case for participatory evaluation. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 14, 397-418.
11.
Cousins, J. B., & Earl, L. E. (1995). Participatory evaluation in education. London: The Falmer Press.
12.
Cousins, J. B., & Leithwood, K. A. (1986). Current empirical research on evaluation utilization. Review of Educational Research, 56, 331-364.
13.
Cousins, J. B., & Whitmore, E. (1998). Framing participatory evaluation. New Directions for Evaluation, 80, 5-23.
14.
Daillak, R. (1982). What is evaluation utilization?Studies in Educational Evaluation, 8, 157-162.
15.
The David and Lucille Packard Foundation. (2001). Improving the practice and use of evaluation to advance the mission of philanthropies and non-profits. (Working Paper) Los Altos, CA and San Francisco, CA: Author.
16.
Dixon, N. (1994). The organizational learning cycle. London: McGraw-Hill.
17.
Dixon, N. (1999). Learning across organizational boundaries: A case study of Canadian museums. In M. Easterby-Smith, J. Burgoyne, & L. Araujo (Eds.), Organizational learning and the learning organization (pp. 115-129). London: Sage.
18.
Driscoll, M., & Preskill, H. (1996). The journey toward becoming a learning organization—Are we almost there? In K. Watkins & V. Marsick (Eds.), Creating the learning organization, Volume 1(pp. 67-80). Alexandria, VA: American Society for Training and Development.
19.
Dubrovin, M. (1993). Picture book of idioms in five languages. Moscow: Prosvesheniye.
20.
Fetterman, D. M. (1994). Steps of empowerment evaluation: From California to Cape Town. Evaluation and Program Planning, 17, 305-313.
21.
Fetterman, D. M. (1996). Empowerment evaluation: An introduction to theory and practice. In D. M. Fetterman, S. J. Kaftarian, & A. Wandersman (Eds.), Empowerment evaluation: Knowledge and tools for self-assessment and accountability (pp. 3-46). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
22.
Fitzpatrick, J. (1998). Conversation with Marsha Mueller. American Journal of Evaluation, 19, 87-99.
23.
Forss, K., Cracknell, B., & Samset, K. (1994). Can evaluation help an organization to learn?Evaluation Review, 18, 574-591.
24.
Greene, J. C. (1987). Stakeholder participation in evaluation design: Is it worth the effort?Evaluation and Program Planning, 10, 375-394.
25.
Greene, J. C. (1988). Stakeholder participation and utilization in program evaluation. Evaluation Review, 12, 91-116.
26.
Hall, G. E., Loucks, S. F., Rutherford, W. L., & Newlove, B. W. (1975). Levels of use of the innovation: A framework for analyzing innovation adoption. Journal of Teacher Education, 26, 5-9.
27.
Hueber, T. (2000). Theory-based evaluation: Gaining a shared understanding between school staff and evaluators. New Directions for Program Evaluation, 87, 79-89.
28.
Johnson, R. B. (1998). Toward a theoretical model of evaluation utilization. Evaluation and Program Planning, 21, 93-110.
29.
Kim, D. H. (1995). Managerial practice fields: Infrastructures of a learning organization. In S. Chawla & J. Renesch (Eds.), Learning organizations: Developing cultures for tomorrow’s workplace (pp. 351-363). Portland, OR: Productivity Press.
30.
King, J. A. (1988). Research on evaluation use and its implications for evaluation research and practice. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 14, 285-299.
31.
Lackey, R. (2000). The role of the chief learning officer: Implications for theory and practice. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of New Mexico.
32.
Leviton, L. C., & Hughes, E. F. X. (1981). Research on the utilization of evaluations. Evaluation Review, 5, 525-548.
33.
Lewin, K. (1952). Field theory in social science. London: Tavistock.
34.
Mathison, S. (1991). Role conflicts for internal evaluators. Evaluation and Program Planning, 14(3), 173-179.
35.
Mathison, S. (1994). Rethinking the evaluator role: Partnerships between organizations and evaluators. Evaluation and Program Planning, 17(3), 299-304.
36.
Mueller, M. (1998). The evaluation of Minnesota’s Early Childhood Family Education Program. American Journal of Evaluation, 19, 80-86.
37.
Newman, D. L., Brown, R. D., & Rivers, L. S. (1983). Locus of control and evaluation use: Does sense of control affect information needs and decision making?Studies in Educational Evaluation, 9, 77-88.
38.
O’Sullivan, R. G., & O’Sullivan, J. M. (1998). Evaluation voices: Promoting evaluation from within programs through collaboration. Evaluation and Program Planning, 21, 21-29.
39.
Owen, J. M., & Rogers, P. (1999). Program evaluation: Forms and approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
40.
Owen, J. M., & Lambert, F. C. (1995). Roles for evaluation in learning organizations. Evaluation, 1, 259-273.
41.
Patton, M. Q. (1978). Utilization-focused evaluation. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
42.
Patton, M. Q. (1986). Utilization-focused evaluation. (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
43.
Patton, M. Q. (1997). Utilization-focused evaluation: The new century text. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
44.
Preskill, H., & Caracelli, V. (1997). Current and developing conceptions of use: Evaluation use TIG survey results. Evaluation Practice, 18, 209-225.
45.
Preskill, H., & Torres, R. T. (1999). Evaluative inquiry for learning in organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
46.
Preskill, H., & Torres, R. T. (2000). The learning dimension of evaluation use. New Directions for Program Evaluation, 88, 25-37.
47.
Rich, R. F. (1977). Uses of social science information by federal bureaucrats: Knowledge for action versus knowledge for understanding. In C. Weiss (Ed.), Using social research in public policy making. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
48.
Robbins, S. A. (2001). How organizations learn from experience: An empirical exploration of organizational intelligence and learning. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of New Mexico.
49.
Rogers, E. (1995). Diffusion of innovations (4th ed.) New York: Free Press.
50.
Russ-Eft, D., & Preskill, H. (2001). Evaluation in organizations: A systematic approach to enhancing learning, performance, and change. Boston, MA: Perseus Books.
51.
Ryan, K. E., & Johnson, T. D. (2000). Democratizing evaluation: Meanings and methods from practice. New Directions for Program Evaluation, 85, 39-50.
52.
Senge, P. M. (1990). The fifth discipline. New York: Doubleday.
53.
Shulha, L. M. (2000). Evaluative inquiry in university-school professional learning partnerships. New Directions for Program Evaluation, 88, 39-53.
54.
Shulha, L. M., & Cousins, B. (1997). Evaluation use: Theory, research, and practice since 1986. Evaluation Practice, 18, 195-208.
55.
Sonnichsen, R. (1999). High impact internal evaluation: A practitioner’s guide to evaluating and consulting inside organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
56.
Torres, R. T. (1991). Improving the quality of internal evaluation: The consultant-mediator approach. Evaluation and Program Planning, 14, 189-198.
57.
Torres, R. T., Preskill, H., & Piontek, M (1996). Evaluation strategies for communicating and reporting: Enhancing learning in organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
58.
Torres, R. T., Preskill, H. S., & Piontek, M. E. (1997). Communicating and reporting: Practices and concerns of internal and external evaluators. Evaluation Practice, 18, 105-125.
59.
Torres, R. T., Stone, S. P., Butkus, D., Hook, B., Casey, J., & Arens, S. A. (2000). Dialogue and reflection in a collaborative evaluation: Stakeholder and evaluator voices. In K. Ryan & L. Destefano (eds.), Evaluation as a democratic process: Promoting inclusion, dialogue, and deliberation. New Directions for Evaluation, Number 85 (pp. 27-38). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
60.
Weiss, C. H. (1981). Measuring the use of evaluation. In J. Ciaro (Ed.), Utilizing evaluations (pp. 17-33). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
61.
Weiss, C. H. (1987). Where politics and evaluation research meet. In D. J. Palumbo (Ed.), The politics of program evaluation (pp. 47-72). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
62.
Weiss, C. H. (1998). Evaluation (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.