Abma, T. A. (1997). Sharing power, facing ambiguity. In L. Mabry (Ed.), Evaluation and the postmodern dilemma: Advances in program evaluation (Vol. 3, pp. 105-120). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
2.
Cole, N. S. (1981). Bias in testing. American Psychologist, 36, 1067-1077.
3.
Cook, T. D. & Campbell, D. T. (1979) . Quasi-experimentation: Design and analysis issues for field settings. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.
4.
Cronbach, L. J. (1971). Test validation. In R. L. Thorndike (Ed.), Educational measurement, 2nd Ed. (pp. 443-507). Washington, DC: American Council on Education.
5.
Greene, J. C. (2000). Understanding social programs through evaluation. In N. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
6.
Henry, G. T. (1996). Does the public have a role in evaluation? Surveys and democratic discourses. In C. Wiser (Ed.), Evaluation and auditing: Prospects for convergence. New Directions in Evaluation, Number 71 (pp. 85-90). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
7.
House, E. R. & Howe, K. R. (1999). Values in evaluation and social research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
8.
Jaeger, R. M. (1992). World class standards, choice, and privatization: Weak measurement serving presumptive policy. Phi Delta Kappan, 74 (October), 118-128.
9.
Kushner, S. (2000). Personalizing evaluation. London: Sage.
10.
Jones, L. V. (1997). National tests and education reform: Are they compatible?The Fourth Annual William H. Angoff Memorial Lecture, ETS, Princeton, NJ, October 8.
11.
Lincoln, Y. S. & Denzin, N. (2000). The seventh moment: Out of the past. In N. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.) , Handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
12.
Linn, R. L. (2000). Assessments and accountability. Educational Researcher, 29 (March), 4-15.
13.
Mabry, L. (Ed.). (1997). Evaluation and the postmodern dilemma: Advances in program evaluation, Vol. 3. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
14.
Madaus, G. F., West, M. M., Harmon, M. C., Lomax, R. G., & Victor, K. A. (1992) . The influence of testing on teaching math and science in grades 4 -12. Chestnut Hill, MA: Center of Study of Testing, Evaluation, and Educational Policy, Boston College.
15.
Schwandt, T. A. (in press). Evaluation practice reconsidered. New York: Peter Lang.
16.
Shepard, L. A. (2000). The role of assessment in a learning culture. Educational Researcher, 29 (7), 4-17.
17.
Smith, E. R. & Tyler, R. W. (1942). Appraising and reporting student progress. New York, NY: Harper and Row.
18.
Smith, N. L. (1981). Metaphors for evaluation: Sources of new methods. New Perspectives in Evaluation, 1. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
19.
Smith, N. L. (1999). A framework for characterizing the practice of evaluation, with application to empowerment evaluation. The Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation,39-68.
20.
Stufflebeam, D. L. (1995). Evaluation of superintendent performance: Toward a general model. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 21, 153-225.
