Campbell, D. (1982). Experiments as arguments. In E. R. House, S. Mathison, J. A. Pearsol, & H. Preskill (Eds.), Evaluation studies review annual (Vol. 7, pp. 117-128). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
2.
Chen, H., & Rossi, P. H. (1987). Evaluating with sense: The theory-driven approach to validity. Evaluation Review, 7, 283-302.
3.
Cook, T. D. (1993). A quasi-sampling theory of the generalization of causal relationships. In L. B. Sechrest & A. G. Scott (Eds.), Understanding causes and generalizing about them. New Directions in Evaluation, Number 57 (pp. 39-82). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
4.
Cronbach, L. J. (1982). Designing evaluations of educational and social programs. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
5.
Davidson, E. J. (2000). Ascertaining causation in theory-based evaluation. In P. J. Rogers, T. A. Hacsi, A. Petrosino, & T. A. Huebner (Eds.), Program theory in evaluation: Challenges and opportunities. New Directions in Evaluation, Number 87 (pp. 17-26). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
6.
Eysenck, H. J. (1978). An exercise in mega-silliness. In T. D. Cook, M. L. Del Rosario, K. M. Hennigan, M. M. Mark, & W. M. K. Trochim (Eds.), Evaluation studies review annual (Vol. 3, p. 697). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
7.
Glass, G. V. (1976). Primary, secondary, and meta-analysis of research. Educational Researcher, 5, 3-8.
8.
House, E. R., & Howe, K. R. (1999). Values in evaluation and social research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
9.
House, E. R. (1991). Realism in research. Educational Researcher, 20 (6), 2-9.
10.
Lipsey, M. W. (1993). Theory as method: Small theories of treatments. In L. B. Sechrest & A. G. Scott (Eds.), Understanding causes and generalizing about them. New Directions in Evaluation, Number 57 (pp. 5-38). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
11.
Mackie, J. L. (1974). The cement of the universe. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
12.
Mark, M. M., Henry, G. T., & Julnes, G. (2000). Evaluation: An integrated framework. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
13.
Maxwell, J. A. (1996). Using qualitative research to develop causal explanations. Working Paper, Harvard Project on Schooling and Children. Cambridge, MA.
14.
Pawson, R. & Tilley, N. (1997). Realistic evaluation. London: Sage.
15.
Reichardt, C. S., & Rallis, S. F. (Eds.). (1994). The qualitative-quantitative debate: New perspectives. New Directions in Program Evaluation, Number 61. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
16.
Rogers, P. J., Hacsi, T. A., Petrosino, A., Huebner, T. A. (Eds.). (2000). Program theory in evaluation: Challenges and opportunities. New Directions in Evaluation, Number 87. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
17.
Smith, M. L., & Glass, G. V. (1977). Meta-analysis of psychotherapy outcomes studies. American Psychologist, 32, 752-760.
18.
Suchman, E. A. (1967). Evaluative research. New York, NY: Russell Sage.