American Evaluation Association, Task Force on Guiding Principles for Evaluators. (1995). Guiding principles for evaluators. In W. R. Shadish, D. L. Newman, M. A. Scheirer, & C. Wye (Eds.), Guiding principles for evaluators. New Directions for Program Evaluation, 66 (pp. 19-26). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
2.
Casebeer, A., & Thurston, W. E. (1995). Evaluability assessment in health care: An example of the patient care and outcome process. The Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation, 1, 89-102.
3.
Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation. (1994). The program evaluation standards (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
4.
Patton, M. Q. (1997). Utilization-focused evaluation: The new century text (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
5.
Rogers, P. J., Petrosino, A., Huebner, T. A., & Hacsi, T. A. (2000). Program theory evaluation: Practice, promise and problems. In P. Rogers, T. Hacsi, A. Petrosino, & T. Huebner (Eds.), Program theory in evaluation: Challenges and opportunities. New Directions for Evaluation, 87 (pp. 5-13). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
6.
Smith, M. F. (1989). Evaluability assessment. Boston: Kluwer.
7.
Wholey, J. S. (1987). Evaluability assessment: Developing program theory. In L. Bickman (Ed.), Using program theory in evaluation. New Directions for Program Evaluation, 33 (pp. 77-92). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
8.
Wholey, J. S. (1994). Assessing the feasibility and likely usefulness of evaluation. In J. Wholey, H. Hatry, & K. Newcomer (Eds.), Handbook of practical program evaluation (pp. 15-39). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
