Empowerment Evaluation Applied: Experiences,Analysis,and Recommendations from a Case Study

Abstract

The empowerment evaluation approach is applied and examined within the context of a case study involving three comprehensive communities’ initiatives. Although considerable literature has been published concerning the efficacy and legitimacy of the empowerment evaluation approach, little documentation exists regarding the empirical application of this approach. In this article we discuss, from both theoretical and empirical perspectives, issues related to the evaluator’s role, differences relative to other inclusive evaluation approaches, stakeholder involvement, evaluation context variables, and the concept and practice of empowering program participants via an evaluation approach. Data were gathered to assess how the approach was viewed through the eyes of both the evaluation consumers and the evaluators. Recommendations are discussed regarding the types of circumstances that might most facilitate and support the empowerment evaluation approach.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

American Evaluation Association, Task Force on Guiding Principles for Evaluators . (1995). Guiding principles for evaluators. In W. R. Shadish , D. L. Newman , M. A. Scheirer , & C. Wye (Eds.), Guiding principles for evaluators. New Directions for Program Evaluation, 66 (pp. 19-26). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Ayers, T. D. (1987). Stakeholders as partners in evaluation: A stakeholder-collaborative approach. Evaluation and Program Planning, 10, 263-271.

Cousins, J. B. , & Earl, L. (1992). The case for participatory evaluation. Educational Evaluation and Practical Analysis, 14, 397-418.

Fetterman, D. M. , Kaftarian, S. , & Wandersman, A. (Eds.). (1996). Empowerment evaluation: Knowledge and tools for self-assessment and accountability. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Fetterman, D. M. (1996). Empowerment evaluation: An introduction to theory and practice. In D. M. Fetterman , S. Kaftarian , & A. Wandersman (Eds.), Empowerment evaluation: Knowledge and tools for self-assessment and accountability. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Fetterman, D. M. (1997). Empowerment evaluation: A response to Patton and Scriven. Evaluation Practice, 18, 253-256.

Folkman, D. V. , & Rai, K. (1997). Reflections on facilitating a participatory community self-evaluation. Education and Program Planning, 20, 455-465.

Greene, J. C. (1997). Evaluation as advocacy. Evaluation Practice, 18, 25-35.

Kubisch, A. C. (1996-7). Comprehensive community initiatives: Lessons in neighborhood transformation. National Housing Institute [On-line]. Available: http://www.nhi.org/online/issues/85/compcominit.html

10.

Kubisch, A. C. , Brown, P. , Chaskin, R. , Hirota, J. , Joseph, M. , Richman, H. , & Roberts, M. (1995). Voices from the field: Learning from comprehensive community initiatives. Paper presented at Roundtable on Comprehensive Community Initiatives for Children and Families of the Aspen Institute.

11.

Lackey, D. , Moberg, D. P. , & Balistrieri, M. (1997). By whose standards? Reflections on empowerment evaluation and grassroots groups. Evaluation Practice, 18, 137-146.

12.

Murphy-Berman, V. , Schnoes, C. J. , & Chambers, J. M. (in press). An evaluation model for assessing the effectiveness of comprehensive community initiatives: Three case studies in Nebraska. Evaluation and Program Planning.

13.

Patton, M. Q. (1997a). Toward distinguishing empowerment evaluation and placing it in a larger context. Evaluation Practice, 18, 147-163.

14.

Patton, M. Q. (1997b). Of vacuum cleaners and toolboxes: A response to Fetterman’s response. Evaluation Practice, 18, 267-270.

15.

Roberts, R. N. , & Wasik, G. H. (1996). Evaluating the 1992 and 1993 community integrated service systems projects. New Directions for Evaluation, 69, 35-49.

16.

Ryan, K. , Greene, J. , Lincoln, Y. , Mathison, S. , & Mertens, D. M. (1998). Advantages and challenges of using inclusive evaluation approaches in evaluation practice. American Journal of Evaluation, 19, 101-122.

17.

Scriven, M. (1997). Empowerment evaluation examined. Evaluation Practice, 18, 165-175.

18.

Sechrest, L. (1997). Review of empowerment evaluation: Knowledge and tools for self assessment and accountability. Environment and Behavior, 29, 422-426.

19.

Stake, R. E. (1980). Program evaluation, particularly responsive evaluation. In W. B. Dockrell & D. Hamilton (Eds.), Rethinking educational research. London: Hodeder & Stoughton.

20.

Whyte, W. F. (Ed.). (1991). Participatory action research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.