Undergraduate advertising campaigns courses are known for their integration of knowledge, application of different skills, and group work. This capstone class partners with a real-world client and may be considered the last professional experience in an educational setting before students graduate. Using a multi-methods approach, this study describes a team-teaching method developed by advertising campaigns instructors at a mid-size private university in Florida, gauges students’ perceptions on several learning dimensions, and maps out how this course is taught in American universities.
AndersonL.KrathwohlD. R. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching and assessing: A revision of bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. Longman.
2.
BanningS. A.SchweitzerJ. C. (2007). What advertising educators think about advertising education. Journal of Advertising Education, 11(2), 10–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/109804820701100205
BloomB. S. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives (Vol. 1). Cognitive domainLongmans, Green.
5.
BrophyJ. (1987). On motivating students. In BerlinerD. C.RosenshineB. V. (Eds.), Talks to teachers (pp. 201–245). Random House.
6.
BuckleyF. J. (2000). Team teaching: What, why, and how?Sage.
7.
ChristophelD. M. (1990). The relationships among teacher immediacy behaviors, student motivation, and learning. Communication Education, 39(4), 323–340. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634529009378813
8.
ConnC. E. (2010). Learning the hard way (but still learning!): Using team teaching as a vehicle for pedagogical change. Business Communication Quarterly, 73(1), 87–91. https://doi.org/10.1177/1080569909358098.
9.
DavisJ. R. (1995). Interdisciplinary courses and team teaching: New arrangements for learning. American Council on Education and the Oryx Press.
10.
DavisM.WinterR. (2019). Team teaching the active way: A case study about the student learning experience. Journal of Instructional Research, 8(1), 33–38. https://doi.org/10.9743/jir.2019.1.3
11.
DucoffeR. H.DucoffeS. J. (1990). Tips from top advertising executives: Implications for advertising education. Journal of Marketing Education, 12(1), 52–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/105256299001200108.
12.
EverettM. W.SiegelC. F.MarchantM. J. (1999). An interdisciplinary team teaching model: A web-based project approach for teaching integrated marketing communication. Journal of Advertising Education, 3(2), 39–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/109804829900300208.
13.
FrymierA. B.ShulmanG. M.HouserM. (1996). The development of a learner empowerment measure. Communication Education, 45(3), 181–199. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634529609379048
14.
GaytanJ. (2010). Instructional strategies to accommodate a team-teaching approach. Business Communication Quarterly, 73(1), 82–87. https://doi.org/10.1177/1080569909358097
15.
GlasserW. (1990). The quality school: Managing students without coercion. Harper and Row Publishers.
16.
GrauS. L.WilsonC. (2015). Welcome to the “real world”: The faculty-professional team teaching approach. Journal of Advertising Education, 19(1), 42–47. https://doi.org/10.1177/109804821501900107
HelmsM. M.AlvisJ. M.WillisM. (2005). Planning and implementing shared teaching: An MBA team-teaching case study. Journal of Education for Business, 81(1), 29–34. https://doi.org/10.3200/JOEB.81.1.29-34
19.
HurrellS. A. (2016). Rethinking the soft skills deficit blame game: Employers, skills withdrawal and the reporting of soft skills gaps. Human Relations, 69(3), 605–628. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726715591636
20.
KearneyP. (2004). Affective learning scale. In RubinR. B.RubinA. M.GrahamE. E.PerseE. M.SeiboldD. (Eds.), Communication research measures II: A sourcebook (pp. 81–85). Routledge.
21.
KerrG.ProudW. (2005). Hiring graduates: Perspectives from advertising and public relations employers In ANZMAC 2005: Broadening the boundaries. Conference proceedings, University of Western Australia Business School, Australia, (pp. 95–100). University of Western Australia Business School.
22.
LeeT. T.RyanW. E. (2005). Advertising creative practitioners on the value of advertising education: An overview. Journal of Advertising Education, 9(2), 14–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/109804829900300208.
McCabeC.GrantK. M. (2007). Making marketing history: An interdisciplinary team teaching approach. Marketing Education Review, 17(1), 15–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/10528008.2007.11488982
25.
McCainJ.MillerA. N. (2013). Evaluation of a joint health communication campaign simulation between an Ad/PR capstone course and a health communication class. Journal of Advertising Education, 17(1), 5–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/109804821301700103
26.
McCroskeyJ. C. (1994). Assessment of affect toward communication and affect toward instruction in communication. In SCA summer conference proceedings and prepared remarks: Assessing college student competence in speech communication, Old-Town-Alexandria, VA, August4–7, 1994. Speech Communication Association.
MorrisP. K. (2016). Team teaching of creative advertising and public relations courses. Journal of Advertising Education, 20 (1/2), 44-53. https://doi.org/10.1177/10980482160201-205
RichmondV. P.GorhamJ. S.McCroskeyJ. C. (1987). The relationship between selected immediacy behaviors and cognitive learning. Annals of the International Communication Association, 10(1), 574–590. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.1987.11678663
RossB. I.OsborneA. C.RichardsJ. I. (2006). Advertising education: Yesterday, today and tomorrow. Advertising Education Publications.
33.
RossB. I.RichardsJ. I. (2017). Where shall I go to study advertising and public relations. American Academy of Advertising.
34.
RovaiA. P.WightingM. J.BakerJ. D.GroomsL. D. (2009). Development of an instrument to measure perceived cognitive, affective, and psychomotor learning in traditional and virtual classroom higher education settings. The Internet and Higher Education, 12(1), 7–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2008.10.002
ScherpereelC. M.BowersM. Y. (2006). Team teaching in an integrated business course. In Developments in business simulation and experiential learning. Proceedings of the Annual ABSEL Conference (33), San Francisco.
37.
Smith DucoffeS. J. S.TromleyC. L.TuckerM. (2006). Interdisciplinary, team taught, undergraduate business courses: The impact of integration. Journal of Management Education, 30(2), 276–294. https://doi.org/10.1177/1052562905284663
38.
SpreitzerG. M. (1995). Psychological empowerment in the workplace: Dimensions, measurement, and validation. Academy of Management Journal, 38(5), 1442–1465. https://doi.org/10.5465/256865
SucciC.CanoviM. (2020). Soft skills to enhance graduate employability: Comparing students and employers’ perceptions. Studies in Higher Education, 45(9), 1834–1847. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2019.1585420
41.
ThomasK. W.VelthouseB. A. (1990). Cognitive elements of empowerment: An “interpretive” model of intrinsic task motivation. Academy of Management Review, 15(4), 666–681. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1990.4310926
42.
van AmelsvoortM.van WijkC.den OudenH. (2010). Going Dutch or joining forces? Some experiences with team teaching in the Netherlands. Business Communication Quarterly, 73(1), 96–101. https://doi.org/10.1177/1080569909358100
43.
WadkinsT.MillerR. L.WozniakW. (2006). Team teaching: Student satisfaction and performance. Teaching of Psychology, 33(2), 118–120. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328023top3302_8
44.
WangM. T. (2012). Educational and career interests in math: A longitudinal examination of the links between classroom environment, motivational beliefs, and interests. Developmental Psychology, 48(6), 1643–1657. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027247
45.
WhitlowS. S. (2014). Rehearsing campaign planning at the start of the capstone course: The inverted case study approach. Journal of Advertising Education, 18(1), 36–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/109804821401800106
