AshtonR.H. (1986). Combining the judgments of experts: How many and which ones?Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 38 (3), 405–414.
2.
BesemerS. & O'QuinK. (1986). Analyzing creative products: Refinement and test of a judging instrument. Journal of Creative Behavior, 20 (2), 115–125.
3.
BolinA.U. & NeumanG.A. (2006). Personality, process, and performance in interactive brainstorming groups. Journal of Business and Psychology, 20 (4), 565–585.
4.
ConnollyT., JessupL. M. & ValacichJ. S. (1990). Effects of anonymity and evaluative tone on idea generation. Management Science, 36 (6), 689–703.
5.
DeanD.L., HenderJ.J., RodgersT. L. & SantanenE. L. (2006). Identifying quality, novel, and creative ideas: Constructs and scales for idea evaluation. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 7 (10), 646–653,656–663,665–668,670–698. Retrieved June 14, 2009, from ABI/INFORM Complete database. (Document ID: 1179465671).
6.
DiehlM. & StroebeW. (1987) Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: Toward the solution of a riddle. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53 (3), 497–509.
7.
FisherB.A. (1980). Small group decision making.New York: McGraw-Hill.
8.
FleissJ.L., LevinB. & MyungheeC. P. (2003). Statistical methods for rates and proportions, 3rd ed. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Songs.
LaneS.P. (1991). The examination of impasse in small group transactions using interaction analysis. (Doctoral dissertation, Boston University, 1991). Dissertation Abstracts International, 52, 73.
11.
LandisJ. R. and KochG. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33, 159–174.
12.
MaierN. R. F. (1970). Problem solving and creativity in individuals and groups.Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
13.
MongeauP.A. & MorrM.C. (1999). Reconsidering brainstorming. Group Facilitation, (1), 14. Retrieved June 14, 2009, from ABI/INFORM Complete database. (Document ID: 389279221).
14.
O'QuinK. & BesemerS. P. (1989). The development, reliability, and validity of the revised Creative Product Semantic Scale. Creativity Research Journal, 2 (4), 267–278.
15.
OsbornA.F. (1957). Applied imagination.New York Charles Scribner's Sons.
16.
ParnesS., MeadowA. (1959). Effects of brainstorming instruction on creative problem solving of trained and untrained subjects. Journal of Educational Psychology, 50, 171–176.
17.
PrinceG.M. (1975). Creativity, self, and power. In TaylorI. A., & GetzelsJ. W. (Eds.), Perspectives in creativity (pp.249–277). Chicago: Aldine.
18.
RedmondM.R. (1990). The influence of leader behavior on subordinate creativity. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Georgia Institute of Technology).
19.
ReinigB.A. & BriggsR.O. (2008). On the relationship between idea-quantity and idea-quality during ideation. Group Decision and Negotiation, 17 (5), 403–420.
20.
RickardsT. (1974). Problem-solving through creative analysis.New York: John Wiley & Sons.
21.
RickardsT, AldridgeS., & GastonK. (1988). Factors affecting brainstorming: Towards the development of diagnostic tools for assessment of creative performance. R&D Management, 18 (4), 309–320.
22.
RussellS.G. (1991). A comparison of approaches to problem solving with elementary school students. (Doctoral dissertation, Boston University, 1991). Dissertation Abstracts International, 52, 2505a–2506a.
23.
SantanenE.L., BriggsR.R., & De VreedeG. (2004). Causal relationships in creative problem solving: Comparing facilitation interventions for ideation. Journal of Management Information Systems, 20 (4), 167–197.
24.
SimontonD.K. (1984). Genius, creativity and leadership: Historiometric inquiries.Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
25.
SmithB.L. (1993). Effect of discounting on the productivity of creative problem-solving groups. (Doctoral dissertation, Boston University, 1993). Dissertation Abstracts International, 53 (11), 3768.
26.
SmithB.L. (1993). Interpersonal behaviors that damage the productivity of creative problem solving groups. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 27 (3), 169–187.
27.
WeaverW.T. (1993). When discounting gets in the way. Training and Development Journal, 47 (7) 55–61.
28.
WeaverW.T. & PrinceG.M. (1990). Synectics: Its potential for education. Phi Delta Kappan, 71 (5) 378–388.
29.
WhiteA. & SmithB. L. (2001) Qualitative evaluation of print ads by assessors using the Creative Product Semantic Scale. Journal of Advertising Research, 41 (6), 27–34.
30.
WilliamsS.D. (2002). Self-esteem and the self-censorship of creative ideas. Personnel Review, 31 (4), 495–503. Retrieved June 7, 2009, from ABI/INFORM Complete database. (Document ID: 271352541).
31.
WittL.A., & BeorkremM. (1989). Climate for creative productivity was a predictor of research usefulness and organizational effectiveness in an R&D organization. Creative Research Journal, 2 (1), 30–40.
32.
WoodmanR.W., SawyerJ.J., & GriffinR.W.1993. Toward a theory of organizational creativity. Academy of Management Review, 18 (2), 293–321.