AstinA. (1993). What Matters in College: Four Critical Years Revisited.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
2.
AksamitD., MorrisM., and Leuenberger (1987). Preparation of student services professionals and faculty for serving learning-disabled college students. Journal of College Student Personnel, 28, 53–59.
3.
BenigniV, & CameronG. (1999). Teaching PR Campaigns: The Current State of the Art. Journalism and Mass Communication Educator, 54(2), 50–60.
4.
HeywardLawton and Associates (1995). Faculty members and service providers: The unhappy alliance. Disability accommodation digest, 4(3/4), 1–4.
5.
HouckC., AsselinS., TroutmanG., and ArringtonJ. (1992). Students with learning disabilities in the university environment: A study of faculty and student perceptions. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 25(10), 678–684.
6.
JarrowJ. (1993). Subpart E: The impact of Section 504 on postsecondary education.Columbus, OH: AHEAD.
7.
JastramP. (1979). The faculty role: New responsibilities for program access. In ReddenM. (Ed.), New directions for higher education: Assuring access for the handicapped (No. 25; pp. 11–22). San Francisco: Josset-Bass.
8.
KingW., and JarrowJ. (1990). Testing accommodations for students with disabilities.Columbus, OH: Association of Handicapped Student Service Providers in Postsecondary Education.
9.
LindlofT.R. (1995). Qualitative communication research methods.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
10.
LundebergM., and SvienK. (1988). Developing faculty understanding of college students with LD. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 21, 299–300, 306.
11.
McCarthyM., and CampbellN. (1993). Serving disabled students: Faculty needs and attitudes. NASP Journal, 31, 120–125.
12.
MilesM., & HubermanA. (1984). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Sourcebook of New Methods.Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
13.
MorrisM., LeuenbergerJ., and AksamitD. (1987). Faculty inservice training: Impact of post-secondary climate for learning disabled students. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 5, 57–66.
14.
NelsonR., DoddJ., and SmithD. (1990). Faculty willingness to accommodate students with learning disabilities: A comparison among academic divisions, Journal of Learning Disabilities, 23, 185–189.
15.
RyanG.W., & BernardH.R. (2000). Data management and analysis methods. In DenzinN.K., & LincolnY.S. (Eds.), (2000). Handbook of qualitative research (p. 769–701) Thousand Oaks: Sage.
16.
ScottS. (1997). Accommodating college students with learning disabilities: How much is enough?Innovative Higher Education, 22(2), 85–99.
17.
ScottS., and GreggN. (2000). Meeting the evolving education needs of faculty in providing access for college students withLD, 33(2, March/April), 158–167.
18.
SharanY., & SharanS. (1992). Expanding Cooperative Learning Through Group Investigation, New York: Teachers College Press.
19.
StageF. (1996). Invisible scholars: Students with learning disabilities. Journal ofHigher Education, 67(4), 426–446.
20.
StewartA. (1989). The postsecondary LD primer: A training manual for service providers (USDOE, OSERS, Grant#G0083015188).Cullowhee, NC: Western Carolina University.
21.
TreiseD., and WagnerE. (2002). Cooperation and accommodation strategies for learning-disabled students in team-based courses. Journalism and Mass Communication Educator, Spring, 23–34.