AlbaneseM. A., & MitchellS. (1993). Problem-Based Learning: A Review of Literature on Its Outcomes and Implementation Issues. Academic Medicine, 68(1), 52–81.
2.
Anonymous. (2001, June 7, 2001). State Investigating Widespread MEAP Cheating. Detroit Free Press, pp. A1.
3.
BirkL. (1997). What's So Bad about the Lecture?The Education Digest, 62(9), 58–61.
4.
BitnerM. J., BoomsB. H., & TetreaultM. S. (1990). The Service Encounter: Diagnosing Favorable and Unfavorable Incidents. Journal of Marketing, 54(January), 71–84.
5.
BloomB. s., MadausG. F., & HastingsJ. T. (1981). Evaluation to Improve Learning.New York: McGraw-Hill.
6.
BlumenstykG. (1999). The Marketing Intensifies in Distance Learning. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 45(31), A27–A28, A30.
7.
BrocatoR., & PotockiK. (1996). We care about students…one student at a time. Journal for Quality and Participation (January/February), 74–79.
8.
CarnieA. (2001). How to Handle Cyber-Sloth in Academe. Chronicle of Higher Education, B14.
9.
ClementJ. (1982). Students' Preconceptions in Introductory Mechanics. American Journal of Physics, 50(1), 66–71.
10.
CommanderN. E., & SmithB. D. (1996). Learning Logs: A Tool for Cognitive Monitoring. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 39(6), 446–453.
11.
CrosswhiteJ. (1996). The Rhetoric of Reason.Madison, Wisconsin: University of Wisconsin Press.
12.
DavisJ. R. (1996). Better Teaching, More Learning: Strategies for Success in Post-Secondary Settings.Washington, D.C.: American Council on Education/Oryx Series on Higher Education.
13.
DemingW. E. (1986). Out of the Crisis.Cambridge, Massachusetts: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
14.
EngelJ. (1991). Not Just a Method But a Way of Learning. In BoudD., & FelettiG. (eds.) The Challenge of Problem-Based Learning (pp. 21–31). New York: St. Martin's Press.
15.
FarberJ. (1969). The Student as Nigger.New York: Pocket Books.
16.
FranklinA. (2001, July 11, 2001). Schools to Respond to cheating allegations as Lawmakers Investigate. Detroit Free Press, pp. A1.
17.
FriedR. L. (1998). Parent Anxiety and School Reform: When Interests Collide, Whose Needs Come First?Phi Delta Kappan, 80(4), 264–271.
18.
GardinerL. F. (1995). Redesigning Higher Education: Producing Gains in Student Learning. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education report, 23(No. 7), 66–72.
19.
GardnerH. (1991). The Unschooled Mind: How Children Think and How Schools Should Teach.New York: HarperCollins Publishers.
20.
GardnerH. (1999). The Disciplined Mind: What All Students Should Understand.New York: Simon & Schuster.
21.
GlasserW. (1965). Reality Therapy: A New Approach to Psychiatry.New York: Harper & Row.
22.
GlasserW. (1984). Control Theory: A New Explanation of How We Control Our Lives.New York: Harper & Row, Publishers.
23.
GlasserW. (1990). The Quality School: Managing Students without Coercion.New York: Harper & Row, Publishers.
24.
GlasserW. (1995). The Control Theory Manager: Combining the Control Theory of William Glasser with the Wisdom of W. Edwards Demingt to Explain Both What Quality Is and What Lead-Managers Do to Achieve It.New York: Harper Business.
25.
GuollaM. (1999). Assessing the Teaching Quality to Student Satisfaction Relationship: Applied Customer Satisfaction Research in the Classroom. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 87–97.
26.
HirschC. R., & CoxfordA. F. (1997). Mathematics for All: Perspectives and Promising Practices. School Science and Mathematics, 97(5), 232–241.
27.
JohnsonD. W., & JohnsonR. T. (1989). Cooperation and Competition.Edina, Minnesota: Interaction Book Company.
28.
JohnsonD. W., JohnsonR. T., & HolubecE. J. (1992). Advanced Cooperative Learning (Revised ed.). Edina, Minnesota: Interaction Book Company.
29.
JohnsonD. W., JohnsonR. T., & SchmidtK. (1988). Cooperative Learning Returns to College: What Evidence Is There That It Works?Change (July/August), 27–35.
30.
JohnsonD. W., JohnsonR. T., & SmithK. A. (1991). Active Learning: Cooperation in the College Classroom.Edina, Minnesota: Interaction Book Company.
31.
KemberD., & McKayJ. (1996). Action Research into the Quality of Student Learning: A Paradigm for Faculty Development. Journal of Higher Education, 61(2), 220–225.
32.
KohnA. (1986). No Contest: The Case Against Competition.New York: Houghton Mifflin Company.
33.
KohnA. (1994). Grading: The Issue is Not How but Why. Educational Leadership, 52(2), 38–41.
34.
KohnA. (1995). Punished by Rewards: The Trouble with Gold Stars, Incentive Plans, A's, Praise and Other Bribes.New York: Houghton Mifflin Company.
35.
KohnA. (1998a). Raising the Mark! Only for My Kid. Phi Delta Kappan, 79(8), 568–577.
36.
KohnA. (1998b). What to Look for in a Classroom … and Other Essays.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
37.
KohnA. (1999). D-Grading is Degrading. The High School Magazine, 65(1), 59–64.
38.
KohnA. (2001, August 22, 2001). Emphasis on Testing Leads to Sacrifices in Other Areas. USA Today, pp. A15.
39.
KuhnT. S. (1970). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
40.
LewisA. C. (1990). The Murky Waters of Monitoring Achievement of the National Goals. Phi Delta Kappan, 72(4), 260–261.
41.
LewisA. C. (1997). National Tests Ignite Scorching Debate. Phi Delta Kappan, 79(4), 259–260.
42.
LundquistR. (1999). Critical Thinking and the Art of Making Good Mistakes. Teaching in Higher Education, 4(No. 4), 523–530.
43.
MagerR. F. (1962). Preparing Instructional Objectives.Belmont, California: Fearon Publishers.
44.
McColloughM. A., & GremlerD. D. (1999). Guaranteeing Student Satisfaction: An Exercise in Treating Students as Customers. Journal of Marketing Education, 21(Number 2), 118–130.
MillisB. J. (1994). Faculty Development in the 1990s: What It Is and Why We Can't Wait. Journal of Counseling and Development, 72(5), 454.
47.
O'NeilJ., & TellC. (1999). Why Students Lose when “Tougher Standards” Win. Educational Leadership, 57(1), 18–22.
48.
PotashnikM., & CapperJ. (1998). Distance Education: Growth and Diversity. Finance and Development, 35(1), 42–45.
49.
RamirezA. (1999). Assessment-Driven Reform: The Emperor Still Has No Clothes. Phi Delta Kappan, 81(3), 204–208.
50.
RidingR., & RaynerS. (1998). Cognitive Styles and Learning Strategies: Understanding Style differences in Learning and Behaviour.London: David Fulton Publishers.
51.
RobinsonM. A. (1992). Mastery Learning in Public Schools: Some Areas of Restructuring. Education, 113(1), 121.
52.
RochesterJ. M. (1998). What's It All about, Alfie?/Reply. Phi Delta Kappan, 80(2), 165–169.
53.
RoseC., & NichollM. J. (1997). Accelerated Learning for the 21st Century.New York: Dell Publishing.
54.
RoseR. V. (1998). 95% Right, but Wrong!/Reply. Phi Delta Kappan, 80(2), 166, 169.
55.
SandsG. C., & SmithR. J. (1999). Organizing for Effective Marketing Communications in Higher Education: Restructuring for Your Competitive Edge in Marketing. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 9(2), 41–58.
56.
Science for All Americans. (1990). New York: Oxford University Press.
57.
StutlerD., & CalvarioD. (1996). In Alumni Support, Satisfaction Matters. Fund Raising Management, 12–13.
58.
TooleR. J. (2000). An additional step in the Guided Lecture Procedure. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 44(2), 166–168.
59.
UtterD., NobleC. H., & BradyM. (1999). Investing in the Future: Transforming Current Students Into Generous Alumni. Fund Raising Management (November), 31–38.
60.
WagnerE. L., & SmithA. T. (1991). Mastery-based Learning Design for the Advertising Skills Course. Journalism Educator, 46(1), 32–37.
61.
WalkerP. (1999). Skill Development and Critical Thinking in Higher Education. Teaching in Higher Education, 4(No. 4), 531–547.
62.
WiskeM. S. (1998a). The Teaching for Understanding Guide.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
63.
WiskeM. S. (1998b). Teaching for Understanding: Linking Research with Practice.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
64.
YostD. S., SentnerS. M., & Forlenza-BaileyA. (2000). An Examination of the Construct of Critical Reflection: Implications for Teacher Education Programming in the 21st Century. Journal of Teacher Education, 51(No. 1), 39–49.