AndrewsE. S., and NoelJ.L. (1986, Feb.). Adding life to the case-study method. Training & Development Journal, 4, 28–29.
2.
BaconD.R., StewardK.A., and SilverW.S. (1999, Oct.) Lessons from the best and worst student team experiences: how a teacher can make the difference. Journal of Management Education, 23(5), 467–488.
3.
BarrR.B., and TaggJ. (1995). From teaching to learning: A new paradigm for undergraduate education. Change, 27(6), 13–25.
4.
BilimoriaD. (1995). Modernism, postmodernism, and contemporary grading practices. Journal of Management Education, 19, 440–457.
ConantJ.S., and MokwaM.P. (1987, Fall). Confronting marketing management reality: A design and instruction strategy for an intermediate course. Journal of Marketing Education, 21–32.
7.
DeckerR. (1995). Management team formation for large-scale simulations. In OverbyJ.D., & PatzA.L. (Eds.), Developments in business simulation & experiential exercises (22) (pp. 128–129). Statesboro, GA: Association for Business Simulation and Experiential Learning.
8.
Deeter-SchmelzD.R., and RamseyR. (1998, Summer). Student team performance: A method for classroom assessment. Journal of Marketing Education, 20, 85–93.
9.
ResultsEQW (1995). Employer Survey of the National Center on the Educational Quality of the Workforce.Philadelphia: Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania.
10.
FormanJ., and KatskyP. (1986, Fall). The group report: A problem in small group or writing processes?Journal of Business Communication, 23, 23–35.
11.
ForsythD.R. (1990). Group Dynamics, Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole Publishing Company.
12.
GoretskyE.M. (1984, Fall). Class projects as a form of instruction, Journal of Marketing Education, 33–37.
13.
GosenpudJ. (1990). Evaluation of experiential learning. In GentryJ. (Ed.), Guide to Business Gaming and Experiential Learning (pp. 301–324). London: Nichols/GP.
14.
HaasA.L., HaasR.W., and WotrubaT.R. (1998, Fall). The use of self-ratings and peer ratings to evaluate performances of student group members, Journal of Marketing Education, 20, 200–209.
15.
HardyC., and LataneB. (1986). Social loafing on a cheering task. Social Science, 71(2-3), 165–172.
16.
HarkinsS.G. (1987). Social loafing and social facilitation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 23, 1–18.
17.
HenkeJ.W.Jr. (1985, Fall). Bringing reality to the introductory marketing student, Journal of Marketing Education, 59–71.
18.
HolzbachR.L. (1978, October). Rater bias in performance ratings: Supervisor, self, and peer ratings, Journal of Applied Psychology, 63, 579–88.
19.
JohnsonD.W., JohnsonR.T., and SmithK.A. (1991). Active learning: Cooperation in the college classroom, Edina, MN: Interaction Book Company.
20.
KerrN.L., & BruunS.E. (1981). Ringelmann revisited: alternative explanations for the social loafing effect. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 7, 224–231.
McCorkleD.E. (1997). Teaching direct marketing and competing for the collegiate echo award, Journal of Direct Marketing, 11(1), 66–74.
23.
MoscaJ.B., and HowardL W. (1997, Nov – Dec). Grounded learning: Breathing life into business education, Journal of Education for Business, 73, 90–93.
24.
NevettT. (1992). Cases in Advertising Management, Lincolnwood, IL: NTC Business Books.
25.
PhillipsG.M. (1990). Teaching How to Work in Groups, Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
26.
SaavedraR., and KwunS.K. (1993, June). Peer evaluation in self-managing work groups, Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 450–62.
27.
SaundersP.M. (1997, March). Experiential learning, cases, and simulations in business communication, Business Communication Quarterly, 60, 97–114.
28.
SilvermanR., WeltyW., and LyonS. (1992). Case Studies for Teacher Problem Solving, New York: McGraw-Hill, Inc.
29.
StrongJ.T., and AndersonR.E. (1990, Summer). Free-riding in group projects: Control mechanisms and preliminary data, Journal of Marketing Education, 12, 2, 61–67.
30.
WassermanS. (1994, April). Using cases to study teaching, Phi Delta Kappan, 602–611.
31.
WilliamsD. L., BeardJ.D., and RymerJ. (1991, Summer). Team projects: Achieving their full potential, Journal of Marketing Education, 3, 45–53