This article engages with Tamil thirunangai transgender women’s perceptions and evaluations of masculinity and femininity among themselves and in others. Thirunangai is currently the preferred identity label among transfeminine persons in the city of Chennai in southern India. Pottai is one of many pejorative Tamil words that predate such positive linguistic assertion of Tamil transfeminine identity. In this article, I show how the word pottai is transformed into a word signaling relational plenitude, belonging, and moral selfhood among thirunangais in Chennai. I also attend to three ways in which thirunangais use the word pottai interactionally: (1) to emphasize belonging and intimacy beyond the boundaries of identity, (2) to playfully highlight genres of gendered action, and (3) to show gender’s imbrication with caste and class.
AdamsM. L.2013. “No Taste for Rough-And-Tumble Play.” GLQ: A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies19. no. 4: 514–543.
2.
Arnaldo, C. R.Jr.2020. “Undisputed Racialised Masculinities: Boxing Fandom, Identity, and the Cultural Politics of Masculinity.” Identities: Global Studies in Culture and Power27. no. 6: 655–674.
3.
ArondekarA.2015. “In the Absence of Reliable Ghosts: Sexuality, Historiography, South Asia.” A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies25. no. 3: 98–122.
4.
BhattacharyaS.2022. “Inhabiting the State Subjunctively: Transgender Life-Making Alongside Death and a Pandemic.” Global Public Health17. no. 10: 2447–2459.
5.
BoyceP.2007. “‘Conceiving Kothis’: Men Who Have Sex with Men in India and the Cultural Subject of HIV Prevention.” Medical Anthropology26. no. 2: 175–203.
6.
BridgesT.PascoeC. J.. 2014. “Hybrid Masculinities: New Directions in the Sociology of Men and Masculinities.” Sociology Compass8. no. 3: 246–258.
7.
BucholtzM.HallK.. 2005. “Identity and Interaction: A Sociolinguistic Approach.” Discourse Studies7. no. 4/5: 585–614.
8.
ButlerJ.1993. “Critically Queer.” GLQ: A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies1. no. 1: 17–32.
9.
CohenL.2005. “The Kothi Wars: AIDS Cosmopolitanism and the Morality of Classification.” In Sex in Development: Science, Sexuality, and Morality in Global Perspective, edited by AdamsV.PiggS. L.. Durham: Duke University Press.
10.
ConnellR.1995. Masculinities. Berkeley: University of California Pres.
DemetriouD.2001. “Connell’s Concept of Hegemonic Masculinity: A Critique.” Theory and Society30. no. 3: 337–361.
13.
De NeveGeert. 2004. “The Workplace and the Neighborhood: Locating Masculinities in the South Indian Textile Industry.” In South Asian Masculinities: Context of Change, Sites of Continuity, edited by OsellaF.OsellaC.ChopraR, 60–95. New Delhi. Kali for Women.
14.
DuttaA.2012. “An Epistemology of Collusion: Hijras, Kothis, and the Historical (Dis)continuity of Gender/Sexual Identities in Eastern India.” Gender and History24. no. 3: 825–849.
15.
FlemingL.2012. “Gender Indexicality in the Native Americas: Contributions to the Typology of Social Indexicality.” Language in Society41. no. 3: 295–320.
16.
GillH. S.2020. “Transnational Hair (and Turban): Sikh Masculinity, Embodied Practices, and the Politics of Representation in an Era of Global Travel.” Ethnography23. no. 2: 226–248.
17.
GouldD. B.2009. Moving Politics: Emotion and ACT UP’s Fight against AIDS. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
18.
GuptaA.2005. “Englishpur Ki Kothi: Class Dynamics in Queer Movement in India.” In Because I Have a Voice: Queer Politics in India, edited by NarrainA.BhanG., 124–142. New Delhi: Yoda Press.
19.
HallD.2003. Queer Theories. London: Palgrave.
20.
HallK.1997. “‘Go Suck Your Husband’s Sugarcane’: Hijras and the Use of Sexual Insult.” In Queerly Phrased: Language, Gender, and Sexuality, edited by LiviaA.HallK., 430–460. New York: Oxford University Press.
21.
HinchyJ.2019. Governing Gender and Sexuality in Colonial India: The Hijra, C. 1850-1900. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
22.
HossainA.2012. “Beyond Emasculation: Being Muslim and Becoming Hijra in South Asia.” Asian Studies Review36. no. 4: 495–513.
23.
InhornM. C.2012. The New Arab Man: Emergent Masculinities, Technologies, and Islam in the Middle East. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
24.
KamathH. M.2019. Impersonations: The Artifice of Brahmin Masculinity in South Indian Dance. Oakland: University of California Press.
25.
KängD.2012. “Kathoey ‘In Trend’: Emergent Genderscapes, National Anxieties, and the Re-Signification of Male-Bodied Effeminacy in Thailand.” Asian Studies Review36. no. 4: 475–494.
26.
KrishnaswamyR. (1998) 2011. Effeminism: The Economy of Colonial Desire. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
27.
ManalansanM.2003. Global Divas: Filipino Gay Men in the Diaspora. Durham: Duke University Press.
NandyA.1983. The Intimate Enemy: Loss and Recovery of Self under Colonialism. New York: Oxford University Press.
30.
NatarajS.2019. Trans-formations: Projects of Resignification in Tamil Nadu’s Transgender Rights Movement. PhD diss. Berkeley: University of California.
31.
NatarajS.2022. “The Thirunangai Promise: Gender as a Contingent Outcome of Migration and Economic Exchange.” Anti-Trafficking Review. no. 19: 47–65.
PammentC.2019. “Performing Piety in Pakistan’s Transgender Rights Movement.” Transgender Studies Quarterly6. no. 3: 297–314.
34.
PillayS. P.1859. A Tamil Vade-Mecum or Guide to Ungrammatical Expressions Used in Everyday Conversation. Madras (Chennai): The Society for Promoting Christian Knowledge.
35.
Priyababu. 2008. Moondram Paalin Mugam [The Face of the Third Gender]. Chennai: Sandhya Publications.
36.
ReddyG.2005. With Respect to Sex: Negotiating Hijra Identity in South India. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
37.
RevathiA.2010. The Truth about Me: A Hijra Life Story. New Delhi: Penguin India. Trans. V. Geetha.
38.
RossM. B. 2013. “Baldwin’s Sissy Heroics.” African American Review46. no. 4: 633–651.
39.
RottlerRev. J. P.1834. A Dictionary of the Tamil and English Languages. Madras: The Vepery Mission Press.
40.
RoyJ.2016. “Translating Hijra into Transgender: Performance and Pehchan in India’s Trans-Hijra Communities.” Transgender Studies Quarterly3. no. 3-4: 412–432.
SariaV.2021. Hijras, Lovers, Brothers: Surviving Sex and Poverty in Rural India. New York: Fordham University Press.
43.
SinhaM. 1995. Colonial Masculinity: The ‘Manly Englishman’ and the ‘Effeminate Bengali’ in the Late Nineteenth Century. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
ThangarajS.2013. “Competing Masculinities: South Asian American Identity Formation in Asian American Basketball Leagues.” South Asian Popular Culture11. no. 3: 243–255.
46.
ThangarajS.2015. Desi Hoop Dreams: Pickup Basketball and the Making of Asian American Masculinity. New York: New York University Press.
47.
ThomasH.Jr.2017. Sissy!: The Effeminate Paradox in Postwar U.S. Literature and Culture. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.
48.
TomL.MenonS.. 2021. “Living with the Norm: The Nirvanam Ritual in South Indian Transfeminine Narratives of Self and Transition.” GLQ: A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies27. no. 1: 39–59.
49.
VasudevanA.2020. Between the Goddess and the World: Religion and Ethics Among Thirunangai Transwomen in Chennai, India. PhD diss.University of Texas at Austin.
50.
VasudevanA.2023. “In the Vicinity of Wonder: Thirunangai Devotees of Angalamman and Narratives of Moral Astonishment.” In Wonder in South Asia: Histories, Aesthetics, Ethics, edited by SrinivasT., 145–166. Albany: SUNY Press.
