Although young men’s subjectivity continues to be defined in terms of their heterosexual performance, they feel vulnerable when women increasingly resist submission to men’s desire and control. However, the sexual objectification of women, driven by consumerist urban culture and commercial media, is rapidly pushing the boundaries of men’s (hetero)sexual expression. Men are thus compelled to renegotiate their masculine heterosexual subjectivities in response to women’s resistance and the demands of the moralistic middle-class society. Based on the performativity-performance framework, this article uses focus group data with Hong Kong college men to illustrate the ways that Chinese young men are “performatively vigilant,” resorting to different cultural and discursive resources to construct multiple and diverse subjectivities in defining manhood and responding to their vulnerabilities in different relational contexts. In this process, the hegemony of men as sexually and culturally superior to women and in control of themselves and the situation is propagated.
AllenL.2005. “Managing Masculinity: Young Men’s Identity Work in Focus Groups.” Qualitative Research5:35–57.
2.
AlmogR.KaplanD.2017. “The Nerd and His Discontent: The Seduction Community and the Logic of the Game as a Geeky Solution to the Challenges of Young Masculinity.” Men and Masculinities20:27–48.
3.
BoscoJ.2007. “Young People’s Ghost Stories in Hong Kong.” The Journal of Popular Culture40:785–807.
4.
BradshawC.KahnA. S.SavilleB. K.2010. “To Hook Up or Date: Which Gender Benefits?” Sex Roles62:661–69.
5.
BrickellC.2003. “Performativity or Performance? Clarifications in the Sociology of Gender.” New Zealand Sociology18:158–78.
6.
BrickellC.2005. “Masculinities, Performativity, and Subversion: A Sociological Reappraisal.” Men and Masculinities8:24–43.
7.
ButlerJ.1993. Bodies That Matter: On the Discursive Limits of “Sex.”New York: Routledge.
8.
CarpenterL. M.2002. “Gender and the Meaning and Experience of Virginity Loss in the Contemporary United States.” Gender & Society16:345–65.
9.
ChanL. S.LiongM.2012. “Sexualized Female Bodies: Gender Implications of the Characterization of leng mo in the Hong Kong Print Media.” Hong Kong Journal of Social Sciences42:83–96.
10.
ChanS. H.2002. “Interfacing Feminism and Cultural Studies in Hong Kong: A Case of Everyday Life Politics.” Cultural Studies16:704–34.
11.
CharmazK.2003. “Grounded Theory: Objectivist and Constructivist Methods.” In Strategies of Qualitative Inquiry, 2nd ed., edited by DenzinNorman K.LincolnYvonna S., 249–91. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
12.
ChuD.2013. “The Production of Erotica: Photobooks of Teenage Models in Hong Kong.” Journal of Sex Research50:653–63.
13.
CohanM.2009. “Adolescent Heterosexual Males Talk about the Role of Male Peer Groups in Their Sexual Decision-making.” Sexuality & Culture13:152–77.
14.
CrawfordM.PoppD.2003. “Sexual Double Standards: A Review and Methodological Critique of Two Decades of Research.” Journal of Sex Research40:13–26.
15.
DahlgrenL.EmmelinM.WinkvistA.2007. Qualitative Methodology for International Public Health. Umeå, Sweden: Department of Public, Health and Clinical Medicine, Umeå University.
16.
DaviesB.HarréR.1999. “Positioning and Personhood.” In Positioning Theory: Moral Contexts of Intentional Action, edited by HarréRomLangenhoveLuk Van, 32–52. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
17.
DobsonA. S.2014. “Performative Shamelessness on Young Women’s Social Network Sites: Shielding the Self and Resisting Gender Melancholia.” Feminism & Psychology24:97–114.
18.
FineM.KuriloffP.2006. “Forging and Performing Masculine Identities within Social Spaces: Boys and Men Negotiating the Crucible of Dominant Cultural Representations at the Intersection of Class, Race, Ethnicity, and Sexuality.” Men and Masculinities8:257–61.
19.
FlemingP. J.AndesK. L.DiClementeR. J.2013. “‘But I’m Not Like that’: Young Men’s Navigation of Normative Masculinities in a Marginalised Urban Community in Paraguay.” Culture, Health & Sexuality15:652–66.
20.
FloodM.2008. “Men, Sex, and Homosociality: How Bonds between Men Shape Their Sexual Relations with Women.” Men and Masculinities10:339–59.
21.
GaveyN.McPhillipsK.DohertyM.2001. “‘If It’s Not On, It’s Not On’—Or Is It?: Discursive Constraints on Women’s Condom Use?” Gender & Society15:917–34.
22.
GillR.2003. “From Sexual Objectification to Sexual Subjectification: The Resexualisation of Women’s Bodies in the Media.” Feminist Media Studies3:100–06.
23.
GoffmanE.1971. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin.
24.
HalkierB.2010. “Focus Groups as Social Enactments: Integrating Interaction and Content in the Analysis of Focus Group Data.” Qualitative Research10:71–89.
25.
HearnJ.2012. “A Multi-faceted Power Analysis of Men’s Violence to Known Women: From Hegemonic Masculinity to the Hegemony of Men.” The Sociological Review60:589–610.
26.
HoP. S.2007. “Eternal Mothers or Flexible Housewives? Middle-aged Chinese Married Women in Hong Kong.” Sex Roles57:249–65.
JacobsK.2009. “Sex Scandal Science in Hong Kong.” Sexualities12:605–12.
29.
JohanssonT.2007. The Transformation of Sexuality: Gender and Identity in Contemporary Youth Culture. Hampshire, UK: Ashgate.
30.
KehilyM.2001. “Bodies in School: Young Men, Embodiment, and Heterosexual Masculinities.” Men and Masculinities4:173–85.
31.
KemberD.2010. “Opening up the Road to Nowhere: Problems with the Path to Mass Higher Education in Hong Kong.” Higher Education59:167–79.
32.
KendallL.1999. “‘The Nerd Within’: Mass Media and the Negotiation of Identity among Computer-using Men.” The Journal of Men’s Studies7:353–69.
33.
KimmelM.2008. Guyland: The Perilous World Where Boys Become Men. New York: Harper Collins.
34.
KorobovN.2011. “Young Men’s Vulnerability in Relation to Women’s Resistance to Emphasized Femininity.” Men and Masculinities14:51–75.
35.
LangellierK. M.1999. “Personal Narrative, Performance, Performativity: Two or Three Things I Know for Sure.” Text and Performance Quarterly19:125–44.
36.
LeeM.FungA.2009. “Media Ideologies of Gender in Hong Kong.” In Mainstreaming Gender in Hong Kong Society, edited by CheungFannyHolroydEleanor, 291–309. Hong Kong: The Chinese University Press.
37.
LeungL. C.ChanK. W.2014. “Understanding the Masculinity Crisis: Implications for Men’s Services in Hong Kong.” British Journal of Social Work44:214–33.
38.
LoV. H.SoC. Y. K.ZhangG.2010. “The Influence of Individualism and Collectivism on Internet Pornography Exposure, Sexual Attitudes, and Sexual Behavior among College Students.” Chinese Journal of Communication3:10–27.
39.
LouieK.2002. Theorising Chinese Masculinity: Society and Gender in China. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
40.
LouieK.2003. “Chinese, Japanese and Global Masculine Identities.” In Asian Masculinities: The Meaning and Practice of Manhood in China and Japan, edited by LouieKam, 1–15. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
41.
LuD. L.2007. Four Generations of Hong Kong People. Hong Kong: Step Forward Multi Media.
42.
MakG. C. L.2009. “Girls’ Education in Hong Kong: Incidental Gains and Postponed Inequality.” In Mainstreaming Gender in Hong Kong Society, edited by CheungF. M.HolroydE., 25–48. Hong Kong: Chinese University Press.
43.
MollerM.2007. “Exploiting Patterns: A Critique of Hegemonic Masculinity.” Journal of Gender Studies16:263–76.
44.
Mooney-SomersJ.UssherJ. M.2010. “Sex as Commodity: Single and Partnered Men’s Subjectification as Heterosexual Men.” Men and Masculinities12:353–73.
MouffeC.2009. “Post-marxism: Democracy and Identity.” In Geographic Thought: A Praxis Perspective, edited by HendersonG.WaterstoneM., 332–37. Oxon, UK: Routledge.
47.
NormanM. E.2013. “‘Dere’s Not Just One Kind of Fat’: Embodying the ‘Skinny’-Self through Constructions of the Fat Masculine Other.” Men and Masculinities16:407–31.
48.
O’DonnellM.SharpeS.2000. Uncertain Masculinities: Youth, Ethnicity, and Class in Contemporary Britain. London, UK: Routledge.
49.
QuinnB. A.2002. “Sexual Harassment and Masculinity.” Gender & Society16:386–402.
RichardsonD.2010. “Youth Masculinities: Compelling Male Heterosexuality.” The British Journal of Sociology61:737–56.
52.
TuttyL. M.RotheryM. A.GrinnellR. M.AustinC. D.1996. Qualitative Research for Social Workers: Phases, Steps, & Tasks. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
53.
WeberC. D.2010. “‘I Mean It’s Awkward Anxiety’: Exploring the Role of Sociohistorical Context in Men’s Negotiation of Masculine Subjectivity.” Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies10:337–46.
