This article looks at a 2011 incident which led to a soldier (Marine A) being convicted of murdering an Afghan insurgent. It focuses on the words (quoting from Hamlet) spoken by the Marine as he carried out the killing: “shuffle off this mortal coil, you cunt” and examines the link that these words establish between the war in Afghanistan and Shakespeare’s play. The article explores the connections between Hamlet and Marine A and how their actions can be understood to both parallel each other and diverge around ethical contemplation; access to military masculinity; the banishing of the feminine; and a process of mediation, performance, and interpretation.
AdelmanJ.1992. Suffocating Mothers: Fantasies of Maternal Origin in Shakespeare’s Plays, Hamlet to the Tempest. New York: Routledge.
2.
AradauC.HuysmansJ.2014. “Critical Methods in International Relations: The Politics of Techniques, Devices and Acts.” European Journal of International Relations20:596–619.
3.
BashamV.2013. War, Identity and the Liberal State: Everyday Experiences of the Geopolitical in the Armed Forces. New York: Routledge.
4.
BaumanR.BriggsC.1990. “Poetics and Performance as Critical Perspectives on Language and Social Life.” Annual Review of Anthropology19:59–88.
5.
BialasiewiczL.CampbellD.EldenS.GrahamS.JeffreyA.WilliamsA.J.. 2007. “Performing Security: The Imaginative Geographies of Current US Strategy.” Political Geography26: 405–22.
6.
BleikerR.2001. “The Aesthetic Turn in International Political Theory.” Millennium: Journal of International Studies30:509–33.
7.
BradleyA. C.1991. Shakespearean Tragedy: Lectures on Hamlet, Othello, King Lear, Macbeth. Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin.
8.
BulmerS.2013. “Patriarchal Confusion?” International Feminist Journal of Politics15:137–56.
9.
ButlerJ.2010. Frames of War: When Is Life Grievable?New York: Verso.
ErskineT.LebowR. N.2012. “Introduction.” In Tragedy and International Relations, edited by ErskineT.LebowR. N.1–18. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
21.
FarrellT.GordonS.2009. “COIN Machine: The British Military in Afghanistan.” The RUSI Journal154:18–25.
22.
FrostL.2010. “Aesthetics and Politics.” Global Society24:433–43.
23.
FrostM.2012. “Tragedy, Ethics and International Relations.” In Tragedy and International Relations, edited by ErskineT.LebowN., 21–43. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
24.
GadamerH. G.1975. Truth and Method. New York: Seabury Press.
25.
GoldsteinJ.2001. War and Gender: How Gender Shapes the War System and Vice Versa. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
26.
HearnJ.2012. “Men/Masculinities: War/Militarism—Searching (for) the Obvious Connections?”Making Gender, Making War: Violence, Military and Peacekeeping Practices, edited by KronsellA.SvedbergE.35–51New YorkRoutledge
27.
HigateP.2003. Military Masculinities, Identity and the State. Westport, CT: Praeger.
28.
HigateP.HenryM.2009. Insecure Spaces: Peacekeeping, Power and Performance in Haiti, Kosovo and Liberia. London, UK: Zed books.
29.
HoldenG.2006. “Cinematic IR, the Sublime, and the Indistinctness of Art.” Millennium: Journal of International34:793–818.
30.
HodgesA.2011. The “War on Terror” Narrative: Discourse and Intertextuality in the Construction and Contestation of Sociopolitical Reality. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
31.
JabriV.2006. “Shock and Awe: Power and the Resistance of Art.” Millennium: Journal of International Studies34:819–39.
32.
JordonJ.1989. “Relational Development: Therapeutic implications of Empathy and Shame.” Work in Progress No. 39, Stone Centre Working Paper Series, Wellesley, MA.
33.
KristevaJ.1980. Desire in Language: A Semiotic Approach to Literature and Art. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
34.
KronsellA.2016. “Sexed Bodies and Military Masculinities: Gender Path Dependence in EU’s Common Security and Defense Policy.” Men and Masculinities19:311–36.
35.
MannB.2006. “How America Justifies Its War: A Modern/Postmodern Aesthetics of Masculinity and Sovereignty.” Hypatia21:147–63.
36.
MannB.2014. Sovereign Masculinity: Gender Lessons from the War on TerrorOxford, NYOxford University Press
37.
McKinnonK.1989. Toward a Feminist Theory of the State. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
38.
MooreC.ShepherdL. J.2010. “Aesthetics and International Relations: Toward a Global Politics.” Global Society24:299–309.
PetronellaV. F.1974. “Hamlet’s “To Be or Not to Be” Soliloquy: Once More unto the Breach.” Studies in Philology71:72–88.
46.
Pin-fatV.SternM.2005. “The Scripting of Private Jessica Lynch: Biopolitics, Gender and the ‘Feminization’ of the U.S. Military.” Alternatives30:25–53.
47.
Richter-MontpetitM.2007. “Empire, Desire and Violence: A Queer Transnational Feminist Reading of the Prisoner ‘Abuse’ in Abu Ghraib and the Question of ‘Gender Equality.’” International Feminist Journal of Politics9:38–59.
48.
Sasson-LevyO.2003. “Feminism and Military Gender Practices Israeli Soldiers in “Masculine” Roles.” Sociological Inquiry73:440–65.
49.
ShakespeareW.2007. The Tragedy of Hamlet Prince of Denmark in the RSC’s William Shakespeare: The Complete Works eds. J. Bate and E. Rasmussen. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
50.
ShapiroM. J.2006. “The Sublime Today: Re-partitioning the Global Sensible.” Millennium: Journal of International Studies34:657–81.
