Social scientists implicate high-status men as sexually objectifying women. Yet, few have investigated these men’s perceptions and accounts of their own experiences. Racial variation in gender relations in college has also received little scholarly attention. Analyzing 30 in-depth, individual interviews and surveys and two focus group interviews from Black and White men at a large university, we find racial differences in approaches toward women. More specifically, Black men exhibit more romantic approaches, whereas White men exhibit more sexual approaches. However, these differences are not solely related to race. Instead, ‘‘normative institutional arrangements’’ (e.g., community size and living arrangements) structure these approaches. We discuss the broader theoretical mechanisms regarding masculine performances, gender attitudes and behaviors, and race. In doing so, this study highlights the importance of ‘‘normative institutional arrangements’’ for understanding how the performances of masculinities are legitimized across racial- and status-group categories of men.
Allen, Walter R.1992. The color of success: African-American college student outcomes at predominantly white and historically black public colleges and universities. Harvard Educational Review62:26-44.
2.
Allport, Gordon W.1954. The Nature of Prejudice. Reading, MA : Addison-Wesley.
3.
Anderson, Elijah.1999. Code of the street: Decency, violence, and the moral life of the inner city. New York, NY: W.W. Norton & Company.
4.
Armstrong, Elizabeth, Laura Hamilton, and Brian Sweeney.2006. Sexual assault on campus: A multilevel explanation of party rape. Social Problems53:483-99.
5.
Battle, Juan and Earl Wright II.2002. W.E.B. DuBois’s talented tenth: A quantitative assessment . Journal of Black Studies32:654-72.
6.
Boswell, A.A., and J.Z. Spade.1996. Fraternities and collegiate rape culture: Why are some fraternities more dangerous places for women? Gender & Society10:133-47.
7.
Brandes, Holger.2007. Hegemonic Masculinities in East and West Germany (German Democratic Republic and Federal Republic of Germany). Men and Masculinities, 10:178-196.
8.
Britton, Dana. M.2003. At work in the iron cage: The prison as gendered organization . New York, NY: New York University Press.
9.
Brown, T. L, G. L. Parks, and C. M. Phillips, eds. 2005. African American fraternities and sororities: The history and the vision. Lexington, KY: University Press of Kentucky.
10.
Clark, R.D., and E. Hatfield.1989. Gender differences in receptivity to sexual offers. Journal of Psychology and Human Sexuality2:39-55.
11.
Collins, Patricia Hill.2004. Black sexual politics: African Americans, gender, and the new racism. New York, NY: Routledge .
12.
Connell, R.W.1987. Gender and power. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
13.
Connell, R.W.1995. Masculinities. Second Ed. Berkeley : University of California Press.
14.
DeLamater, J.1987. Gender differences in sexual scenarios. In Females, males, and sexuality: Theories and research, ed. K. Kelley.Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
15.
Denzin, Norman K., and Yvonna S. Lincoln, eds. 1994. Handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage .
16.
DuBois, W.E.B.1903. The souls of black folk. New York, NY: Dover.
17.
DuBois, W.E.B.1939. Black folk, then and now: An essay in the history and sociology of the Negro race. New York: Henry Holt.
18.
Edwards, Korie.2008. Bringing race to the center: The importance of race in racially diverse religious organizations. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion47:5-9.
19.
Emerson, Richard, Rachel Fretz, and Linda Shaw.1995. Writing ethnographic fieldnotes. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
20.
Epstein, Cynthia Fuchs.2007. Women’s subordination in global context. American Sociological Review72:1-22.
21.
Flood, Michael.2008. How bonds between men shape their sexual relations with women. Men and Masculinities10:339-59.
22.
Gerson, Judith M., and Kathy Peiss.1985. Boundaries, negotiation, consciousness: Reconceptualizing gender relations. Social Problems32:317-31.
23.
Harper, Shaun R., Byars, L.F., and Jelke, T.B.2005. How Black Greek-Letter Organization Membership Affects Adjustment and Undergraduate Outcomes. In African American fraternities and sororities: The legacy and the vision, ed. T. L. Brown, G. S. Parks, and C. M. Phillips, 393-416. Lexington, KY: University Press of Kentucky.
24.
Hatfield, E., S. Sprecher, J.T. Pillemer, D. Greenberger, and P. Wexler.1998. Gender differences in what is desired in the sexual relationship. Journal of Psychology and Human Sexuality1:39-52.
25.
Hays, Sharon.1994. Structure and agency and the sticky problem of culture . Sociological Theory12:57-72.
26.
Hearn, Jeff.2004. From hegemonic masculinity to the hegemony of men. Feminist Theory5:49-72.
27.
Hoberman, John.1997. Darwin’s athletes. New York, NY: Houghton.
28.
Hollander, Jocelyn A.2004. The social contexts of focus groups. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography33:605-37.
29.
Hunter, Andrea G., and James E. Davis .1992. Constructing gender: An exploration of Afro-American men’s conceptualization of manhood. Gender and Society6:464-79.
30.
Joyner, Kara, and Grace Kao.2005. Interracial relationships and the transition to adulthood. American Sociological Review70:563-81.
31.
Kanter, Rosenbath Moss.1977. Some effects of proportions of group life: Skewed sex ratios and responses to token women. American Journal of Sociology5:965-90.
32.
Kimbrough, Walter M., and Philo A. Hutcheson .1998. The impact of membership in black Greek-letter organizations on black students’ involvement in collegiate activities and their development of leadership skills. The Journal of Negro Education67:96-105.
33.
Kimmel, Michael S., ed. 1987. Changing men: New directions in research on men and masculinity. Newbury Park, CA. Sage.
34.
Kimmel, Michael S., ed. 2006. Racism as adolescent male rite of passage: Ex-nazis in scandinavia. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography36:202-18.
35.
Kimmel, Michael S., and Michael A. Messner, eds. 1989. Men’s lives. New York, NY: Macmillan.
36.
Konrad, A.M., and C. Harris.2002. Desirability of the Bem sex-role inventory items for women and men: A comparison between African-Americans andEuropean Americans. Sex Roles47:259-72.
37.
Majors, Richard G., and Janet Billson.1992. Cool pose: The dilemmas of black manhood in America. New York, NY: Lexington Books.
38.
Martin, P. Yancey, and R.A. Hummer.1989. Fraternities and rape on campus. Gender and Society3: 457-73.
39.
Massey, Douglas S., Camille Z. Charles, Garvey F. Lundy, and Mary L. Fischer .2003. The source of the river: The social origins of freshman at America’s selective colleges and universities . Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
40.
Millham J., and L.E. Smith.1986. Sex Role Differential among Black and White Americans: A Comparative Study. The Journal of Black Psychology7:77-90.
41.
Morgan, David L.1997. Focus groups and qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
42.
Peralta, Robert L.2007. College Alcohol Use and the Embodiment of Hegemonic Masculinity among European American Men. Sex Roles56:741-756.
43.
Ragin, Charles C.1994. Constructing social research: The unity and diversity of method. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage .
44.
Reskin, Barbara F.2003. Including mechanisms in our models of ascriptive inequality: 2002 presidential address. American Sociological Review68:1-21.
45.
Rizzo, Thomas A., William A. Corsaro, and John E. Bates .1992. Ethnographic methods and interpretive analysis: Expanding the methodological options of psychologists . Developmental Review12:101-23.
46.
Staples, R.1982. Black masculinity: The black males’ role in American society. San Francisco, CA: Black Scholar.
