Among anthropologists of both sexes, there is an enduring cliché that female anthropologists have better access to women's worlds than their male counterparts. I work about female religiosity in a West African Muslim society, the Bulongic (Guinea-Conakry), and my presence as a man was never an issue with the Bulongic women. In fact, from the beginning, I had the feeling that through my presence, the women intended to reinforce the legitimacy of their ritual performances, which was violently contested by the old men of the village. In this article, I address my position in the middle of this tug-of-war between the men and the women. By describing the ways in which Bulongic women instrumentalized my presence as a white ethnologist sensitive to their religious practices, I hope to refine our understanding of the actual effects of gender in the field.
Abramson, Allen.1993Between autobiography and method: Being male, seeing myth and the analysis of structures of gender and sexuality in the eastern interior of Fiji. In Gendered fields: Women, men and ethnography, ed. D. Bell, P. Caplan and W. J. Karim, 63-78. London and New York: Routledge.
2.
Bell Diane, Pat Caplan, and Wazir Jahan Karim, eds. 1993Gendered fields. Women, men and ethnography. London and New York: Routledge .
3.
Berliner, David.2005a An "impossible" transmission. Youth religious memories in Guinea-Conakry. American Ethnologist32 (4): 576-92.
4.
---. 2005b. La féminisation de la coutume. Femmes possédées et transmission religieuse en pays Bulongic (Guinée, Conakry). Cahiers d'Etudes Africaines177, 45 (1): 15-38.
5.
Bourcier, Marie-Hélène.2005. Sexpolitiques. Queer Zones 2. Paris : La Fabrique editions.
6.
Brandes, Stanley.1987. Sex roles and anthropological research in rural Andalusia . Women's Studies13:357-72.
7.
Caplan, Pat.1988. Engendering knowledge: The politics of ethnography. Anthropology Today14 (4-5): 8-12, 14-17.
8.
Cataldi, Sue.1995. Reflections on male bashing. NWSA Journal7 (2): 76-83.
9.
Deluz Ariane, ColetteLe Cour-Grandmaison, and Anne Retel-Laurentin , eds. 1978. La natte et le manguier. Les carnets d'Afrique de trois ethnologues. Paris: Mercure de France.
10.
Digby, Tom, ed. 1998. Men doing feminism. New York and London: Routledge.
11.
Freeman Helen, and Alison Jones.1980. For women only?Women's Studies International Quarterly3:429-40.
12.
Gilmore, David.1990Men and women in southern Spain: "Domestic power" revisited . American Anthropologist92 (4): 953-70.
13.
Golde, Peggy, ed. 1970. Women in the field: Anthropological experiences. Chicago: Aldine.
14.
Gregory, James.1984. The myth of the male ethnographer and the woman's world . American Anthropologist86 (2): 316-27.
15.
Gutmann, Matthew.1997. The ethnographic (g)ambit: women and the negotiation of masculinity in Mexico City. American Ethnologist24 (4): 833-55.
16.
Harding, Sandra.1986. The science question in feminism. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
17.
Hurtig Marie-Claude, Michèle Kail, and Hélène Rouch, eds. 1991. Sexe et genre. Paris: Editions du CNRS.
18.
Jonckers, Danielle.1984. Chez les Minyanka. Cahiers du CRIF ( Paris) 29:23-31.
19.
Jonckers, Danielle, Renée Carré, and Marie-Claude Dupré, eds. 1999. Femmes plurielles. Paris : Editons de la Maison des Sciences de l'Homme.
20.
Journet-Diallo, Odile.1999. Catégories de genre et relation ethnographique chez les Joola du Sénégal. In Femmes plurielles, ed. Danielle Jonckers, Renée Carré, and Marie-Claude Dupré, 21-8. Paris : Editions de la Maison des Sciences de l'Homme.
21.
Journet-Diallo, Odile, and Suzanne Faizang, eds. 1985. La femme de mon mari. Anthropologie du mariage polygamique en Afrique et en France. Paris: L'Harmattan.
22.
Kahane, David.1998. Male feminism as oxymoron. In Men doing feminism, ed. Tom Digby, 213-35. New York and London: Routledge.
23.
Keesing, Roger.1993. Feminism and anthropology: A personal view. In Engendering knowledge: The impact of feminism on the academy, ed. Monica Hotter and Peta Tancred , 43-70. Montreal: McGill University Center for Research and Teaching on Women.
24.
Kessler, Suzanne, and Wendy McKenna.1978. Gender: An ethnomethodological approach . New York: Wiley.
25.
Kremer, Belinda.1990. Learning to say no: Keeping feminist research for ourselves . Women's Studies International Forum13 (5): 463-67.
26.
Kulick, Don, and Margaret Wilson, eds. 1995Taboo: Sex, identity and erotic subjectivity in anthropological fieldwork. New York : Routledge.
27.
Lugo Alejandro, and Bill Maurer, eds. 2000. Gender matters: Rereading Michelle Z. Rosaldo. Michigan: The University of Michigan Press.
28.
Manda, Cesara.1982Reflections of a woman anthropologist: No hiding place . London: Academic Press.
29.
Markowitz, Fran, and Michael Ashkenanzi, eds. 1999. Sex, sexuality, and the anthropologist. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
30.
Maruani, Margaret, ed. 2005. Femmes, genre et sociétés. Paris: La Découverte.
31.
Mathieu, Nicole-Claude.1991. L'anatomie politique. Catégorisations et idéologies du sexe. Paris: Côté-Femmes Editions .
32.
Metso, Milka.2003. The National Survey on the Institutionalisation of Women's and/or Gender Studies in France. Results and propositions for further development of the field. Paper presented at Gender and Power in the New Europe, the fifth European Feminist Research Conference, Lund University, Sweden.
33.
Moore, Henrietta.1988. Feminism and anthropology. Cambridge : Polity.
34.
Pinteaux Agnes, and David Nightingale .2002. The doll's house: Critical men, feminism and academia. Paper presented at the eighth annual Qualitative Methods Conference. Available at http://www.criticalmethods.org/p99.mv.
35.
Riot-Sarcey, Hélène.1999. The difficulties of gender in France: Reflections on a concept. Gender and Society11 (3): 489-98.
36.
Rogers, Susan.1983. Gender definitions in the Latin Quarter: A personal account . Women's Studies10:179-201.
37.
Scaglion, Richard.1986. Sexual segregation and ritual pollution in Abelam society. In Self, sex and gender in cross-cultural fieldwork, ed. Tony Whitehead and Mary Conaway , 151-63. Urbana and Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
38.
Scheper-Hughes, Nancy.1983. The problem of bias in androcentric and feminist anthropology. Women's Studies10:109-16.
39.
Wade, Peter.1993. Sexuality and masculinity in fieldwork among Colombian blacks. In Gendered fields. Women, men and ethnography, ed. D. Bell, P. Caplan and W. J. Karim, 63-78. London and New York: Routledge.
40.
Wax, Rosalie.1986. Gender and age in fieldwork and fieldwork education: "Not any good thing is done by one man alone." In Self, sex and gender in cross-cultural fieldwork, ed. Tony Whitehead and Mary Conaway, 129-50. Urbana and Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
41.
Whitehead, Tony, and Mary Conaway.1986. Self, sex and gender in cross-cultural fieldwork. Urbana and Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
