Qualitative research interviews were conducted with professionals working with men inclined to violence. The aim was to explore professional discourses about intimate partner violence with special reference to gender and to the partner's period of pregnancy. Three major findings are presented. Firstly, the professionals had a rather fixed understanding of opposite gender positions as well as a split picture of the violent man as both weak and tough, thus violence may result from poor self-confidence combined with a desire for power and control and the fear of losing it. Secondly, the pregnancy was identified as a stressor that, together with other circumstances, could trigger violence. Thirdly, the topic of pregnancy and other relational topics were typically omitted from the conversations with men inclined to violence. This study discusses inconsistencies that might counteract the professionals' intentions of building an alternative masculinity in men inclined to violence.
Anderson, H., and H.A. Goolishian .1988. Human systems as linguistic systems: Preliminary and evolving ideas about the implications for clinical theory. Family Process27(4): 371-393.
2.
Burr, V.2003. Social Constructionism. London: Routledge.
3.
Campbell, J.C., C. Oliver, and L. Bullock.1993. Why battering during pregnancy?AWHONN's Clinical Issues in Perinatal and Womens Health Nursing4(3): 343-349.
4.
Campbell, J., C. García-Moreno, and P. Sharps.2004. Abuse during pregnancy in industrialized and developing countries. Violence Against Women10(7): 770-789.
5.
Connell, R.W.1995. Masculinities. Berkeley and Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.
6.
Dahlgren, L., M. Emmelin, and A. Winkvist.2004. Qualitative methodology for international public health. Umeå International School of Public Health, Umeå University, Umeå.
7.
Davies, B. and R. Harré.2001. Positioning: The discoursive production of self. In Discourse theory and practice: A reader, edited by M. Wheterell, S.Taylor, and S. J.Yates.London: Sage.
8.
Delsol, C., and G. Margolin.2004. The role of family-of-origin violence in men's marital violence perpetration. Clinical Psychology Review24(1): 99-122.
9.
Dye, T.D., N.J. Tollivert, R.V. Lee, and C.J. Kenney.1995. Violence, pregnancy and birth outcome in Appalachia. Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology. 9(1): 35-47.
10.
Edin, K.E., and U. Högberg.2002. Violence against pregnant women will remain hidden as long as no direct questions are asked. Midwifery . 18(4): 268-278.
11.
Edley, N.2001. Analysing masculinity; interpretative repertoires, ideological dilemmas and subject positions. In Discourse as data: A guide for analysis, edited by M.Wetherell, S.Taylor, and S. J.Yates.London: Sage.
12.
Eliasson, P.E.2000. Men, women and violence: understanding and changing violent behavior: A report from Manscentrum in Stockholm. Bjärnum : Carlsson bokförlag.
13.
Eriksson, M.2005. A visible or invisible child? Professionals' approaches to children whose father is violent towards their mother. In Tackling men's violence in familie: Nordic issues and dilemmas, edited by M. Eriksson, M. Hester, S. Keskinen, and K. Pringle.Bristol: Policy Press.
14.
Firestone, M., R.J. Harris, and W.A. Vega.2003. The impact of gender ideology, male expectancies, and acculturation of wife abuse. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry26(5): 549-564.
15.
Fraser, N.1997. Structuralism or pragmatics? On discourse theory and feminist politics. In The second wave-a reader in feminist theory, edited by L. Nicholson.London : Routledge.
16.
Hall, S.2001. Focault: Power knowledge and discourse. In Discourse theory and practic: A reader, edited by M. Wetherell, S. Taylor, and S. J. Yates.London: Sage Publications.
17.
Hautanen, T.2005. Bypassing the relationship between fatherhood and violence in Finnish policy and research. In Tackling men's violence in families: Nordic issues and dilemmas, edited by M. Eriksson, M. Hester, S. Keskinen, and K. Pringle.Bristol: Policy Press.
18.
Hautzinger, S.2003. Researching men's violence, personal reflections on ethnographic data. Men and Maculinities6(1): 93-106.
19.
Hearn, J.1998. The violences of men. London: Sage.
20.
Heise, L.L.1998. Violence against women: an integrated, ecological framework . Violence Against Women4(3): 262-290.
21.
Heise, L.,M. Ellsberg , and M. Gottemoeller (Eds.) 1999. Population reports, ending violence against women. Baltimore, MD: Population Information. Program, Center for communication programs, The John Hopkins University School of Public Health .
22.
Heise, L., M. Ellsberg , and M. Gottemoeller (Eds.) 2002. A global overview of gender-based violence. International Journal of Gynaecology and Obstetrics78 (1): 5-14.
23.
Jasinski, J.L.2004. Pregnancy and domestic violence: A review of the literature . Trauma Violence Abuse5(1): 47-64.
24.
Kimmel, M.S.1987. Rethinking "Masculinity": New directions in research. In Changing me: New directions in research on men and masculinity, edited by S. Kimmel.London : Sage Publications.
25.
Kvale, S.1996. Interviews: An introduction to qualitative research interviewing .Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
26.
Marshall, C. and Rossman, G.B.1989. Designing Qualitative Research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
27.
Mullender, A.1996. Rethinking domestic violence: The social work and probation response. London: Routledge.
28.
Petersen, R., L.E. Saltzman, M. Goodwin, and A. Spitz.1998. Key scientfic isues for research on violence occurring around the time of pregnancy. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
29.
Reiz, R.R.1999. Batterers' experience of being violent-a phenomenological study. Psychology of Women Quarterly23(1): 143-165.
30.
Rodriguez, M.A., S.S. Quiroga, and H.M. Bauer.1996. Breaking the silence. Battered women's perspectives on medical care. Archives of Family Medicine5(3): 153-158.
31.
Ross, S.M.1996. Risk of physical abuse to children of spouse abusing parents . Child Abuse and Neglect20(7): 589-598.
32.
Rothman, E.F., A. Butchart, and M. Cerdá.2003. Intervening with perpetrators of intimate partner violence: A global perspective. Geneva: World Health Organization.
33.
Råkil, M., ed. 2002. Men's violence against women (only available in Norwegian: Menns vold mot kvinner) . Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
34.
Saltzman, L.E., C.H. Johnson, B.C. Gilbert, and M.M. Goodwin.2003. Physical abuse around the time of pregnancy; an examination of prevalence and risk factors in 16 states. Maternal and Child Health Journal7(1): 31-43.
35.
Shadigian, E.M., and S.T. Bauer.2004. Screening for partner violence during pregnancy. International Journal of Gynaecology and Obstetrics84(3): 273-280.
36.
Starrin, B., L. Dahlgren, G. Larsson, and S. Styrborn.1997Along the path of discovery. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
37.
Stenson, K., H. Saarinen, G. Heimer, and B. Sidenvall.2001. Women's attitudes to being asked about exposure to violence. Midwifery17(1): 2-10.
38.
Taylor, S.2001. Locating and conducting discourse analytic research. In Discourse as data: A guide for analysis, edited by M. Wetherell, S. Taylor, and S. J. Yates.London : Sage.
39.
Wheterell, M., S. Taylor , and S. J. Yates, eds. 2001a. Discourse as data: A guide for analysis. London: Sage.
40.
Wheterell, M., S. Taylor , and S. J. Yates, eds. 2001b. Discourse theory and practice: A reader. London: Sage.
41.
WHO (2002). Violence by intimate partners. In World report on violence and health, edited by E. G. Krug, L. L. Dahlberg, J. A. Mercy, A B. Zwi, and R. Lozano.Geneva: World Health Organization .
42.
WHO (2005). WHO multi-country study on women's health and domestic violence against women. Geneva: World Health Organization.
