This article explores processes by which masculinities change, using examples from the Norwegian forestry industry. Forestry has traditionally been one of the most masculine rural work activities and an arena where hegemonic rural masculinity is expressed. The study is based on mediations of masculinity in a forestry magazine covering a period of twenty years. Using text, body, and tools as an analytic scheme, pictures of temporal variations of, and relations between, “traditional” and “new” types of masculinity are described. Even though practical, physical work in the forest is a basis for rural hegemonic masculinity, other types of work with new cultural influences (organizational and expert work) lead to “dialogical” masculinities, which open up for more flexible boundaries and cultural borrowing. This might be important to secure the future viability of rural industries and communities, especially if the recruitment of women is desirable.
Aronowitz, Stanley. 1989.Workingclass culture in the electronic age. In Cultural politics in contemporary America, ed. I. Angus and S. Jhally. New York: Routledge.
2.
Barthel, Diane. 1992. When men put on appearance. In Men, masculinity and the media, ed. S. Craig. London: Sage.
3.
Brandth, Berit. 1995. Rural masculinity in transition: Gender images in tractor advertisements. Journal of Rural Studies11 (2): 123-133.
4.
Brandth, Berit, and Marit S. Haugen. 2000. From lumberjack to business manager: Masculinity in the Norwegian forestry press. Journal of Rural Studies16 (4): 343-355.
5.
Campbell, Hugh, and Michael M. Bell. 2000a. The question of rural masculinities. Rural Sociology65 (4): 532-546.
6.
Campbell, Hugh, and Michael M. Bell. eds. 2000b. Rural Masculinities. Special issue, Rural Sociology65, no. 4.
7.
Carrigan, Tim, Bob Connell, and John Lee. 1985. Hard and heavy: Towards a new sociology of masculinity. Theory and Society14:551-604.
8.
Casey, Catherine. 1995. Work, self and society: After industrialism. London: Routledge.
9.
Connell, Robert W.1987. Gender and power. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
10.
Davies, Bronwyn. 1993. Shards of glass: Children reading and writing beyond gendered identities. St. Leonards, New South Wales, Australia: Allen and Unwin.
11.
Dunk, Thomas W.1991. It’s a working man’s town: Male working-class culture in Northwestern Ontario. Montreal, Canada: McGill-Queen’s University Press.
12.
Dunk, Thomas W.1994. Talking about trees: Environment and society in forest workers’ culture. Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology31:14-34.
13.
Follo, Gro. 2002. A hero’s journey: Young women among males in forestry education. Journal of Rural Studies18:293-306.
14.
Giddens, Anthony. 1991. Modernity and self-identity: Self and society in the late modern age. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
15.
Johansson, Ella. 1989. Beautiful men, fine women and good work people: Gender and skill in northern Sweden, 1850-1950. Gender &! History1 (2): 200-212.
16.
Kaldal, Ingar. 2000. Skog, arbeid og dagligliv i kvinners og menns fortellinger fra Trysil og Nord-Värmland etter 1930, in Skogsliv. Kulturelle prosesser i nordiske skogsbygder, ed. Ingar Kaldalet al.Lund, Sweden: Historiska Media.
17.
Lie, Merete. 1995. Technology and masculinity: The case of the computer. The European Journal of Women’s Studies2 (3): 379-394.
18.
Liepins, Ruth. 1998. The gendering of farming and agricultural politics: A matter of discourse and power. Australian Geographer29 (3): 371-388.
Little, Jo. 2002b. Rural geography: Rural gender identity and the performance of masculinity and femininity in the countryside. Progress in Human Geography26 (5): 665-670.
21.
Morgan, David H. J.1992. Discovering men. London: Routledge.
22.
Morgan, David H. J.1993. You too can have a body like mine: Reflections on the male body and masculinities. In Body matters, ed. Sue Scott and David Morgan. London: Falmer Press.
23.
Morgan, Gareth. 1997. Images of organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
24.
Ni Laoire, Caitriona. 2001. A matter of life and death? Men, masculinities and staying “behind” in rural Ireland. Sociologia Ruralis41 (2): 220-236.
25.
Peter, Gregory, Michael M. Bell, Susan Jarnagin, and Donna Bauer. 2000. Coming back across the fence: Masculinity and the transition to sustainable agriculture. Rural Sociology65 (2): 215-233.
26.
Parkins, Wendy. 2000. Protesting like a girl: Embodiment dissent and feminist agency. Feminist Theory1 (1): 59-78.
27.
Saugeres, Lise. 2002a. Of tractors and men: Masculinity, technology and power in a French farming community. Sociologia Ruralis42 (2): 143-159.
28.
Saugeres, Lise. 2002b. The cultural representation of the farming landscape: Masculinity, power and nature. Journal of Rural Studies18 (4): 373-384.
29.
Shilling, Chris. 1993. The body and social theory. London: Sage.
30.
Skogen, Ketil. 1999. Cultures and natures: Cultural patterns, environmental orientations and outdoor recreation practices among Norwegian youth. Nova Report 16/99, Norwegian Social Research, Oslo.
31.
Smith, Dorothy E.1990. Texts, facts, and femininity: Exploring the relations of ruling. London: Routledge.
32.
Snow, David. 2001. Collective identity and expressive forms. Paper 01’07, University of California, Irvine, available at http://repositories.cdlib.org/csd/o1-07.
33.
Somers, M.1994. The narrative constitution of identity: A relational and network approach. Theory and Society23:605-649.
34.
Søndergaard, Dorte Marie. 1999. Destabilising discourse analysis: Approaches to poststructuralist empirical research. Working Paper No. 7, Køn i den akademiske organisasjon, University of Copenhagen, Denmark.
