Abstract
Introduction:
Physician-assisted dying (PAD) is legal in an increasing number of jurisdictions across the United States. Despite this, formal hospice and palliative medicine (HPM) fellowship curricula on PAD are lacking. To address this, a neutral (nonadvocacy) PAD pilot curriculum was developed and implemented in one large HPM fellowship program.
Methods:
A five-lecture curriculum was developed by an interdisciplinary group using Kern’s six-step method. Comfort, knowledge, and satisfaction were assessed.
Results:
17 fellows were eligible to complete curriculum assessments with a 76% response rate on the postcurriculum survey (N = 13). Self-reported comfort improved significantly across all measured domains. Ninety-two percent of respondents were very or somewhat satisfied; 85% of respondents agreed the curriculum maintained a neutral tone.
Conclusion:
HPM fellows value PAD education, even when practicing in a state where it is illegal. A neutral curriculum is feasible, improves comfort, and is well received. This offers a model for integrating PAD education into HPM training.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
