While virtual reality (VR) is a valuable therapeutic tool, its utility for hospice and palliative care (HPC) is understudied.
Objectives:
We explored the use of VR with patients receiving inpatient HPC.
Design:
Mixed methods study examining feasibility and clinical outcomes of a VR program.
Setting/Subjects:
Twenty-five veterans with complex medical and psychiatric comorbidities at a Veterans Affairs hospital participated. Data related to self-reported pain and well-being, as well as session feedback, were gathered.
Results:
Despite some challenges with setup, 91% reported enjoyment, and 90% would participate again. Travel experiences were most popular, allowing reminiscence and touring of bucket-list destinations. Program feedback suggested improvements in anxiety, mood, and boredom.
Conclusions:
Results demonstrate the use of VR to facilitate meaningful engagement and improve psychological well-being for veterans receiving HPC. Additionally, opportunities for socialization and reminiscence, even while bedbound, increased. These findings support further exploration of VR as an intervention in HPC.
BirckheadB, KhalilC, LiuX, et al.Recommendations for methodology of virtual reality clinical trials in health care by an International Working Group: Iterative study. JMIR Ment Health, 2019; 6(1):e11973.
2.
BaileyA, HaywoodT. VA Immersive Executive Roundtable 2023. 2023.
3.
BaileyAL, KirshS, RawlinsC, et al.Early scaling of immersive technology within the Veterans Health Administration. NEJM Catal Innov Care Deliv, 2024; 5(4); doi: 10.1056/CAT.23.0356
4.
GainaAM, StefanescuC, SzalontayAS, et al.A systematic review of virtual reality’s impact on anxiety during palliative care. Healthcare (Basel), 2024; 12(24):2517.
5.
HuangQ, LinJ, HanR, et al.Using virtual reality exposure therapy in pain management: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Value Health, 2022; 25(2):288–301.
6.
HuangY, DengC, PengM, et al.Experiences and perceptions of palliative care patients receiving virtual reality therapy: A meta-synthesis of qualitative studies. BMC Palliat Care, 2024; 23(1):182.
7.
TanY, LiangX, MingW, et al.A scoping review of digital technology applications in palliative care. BMC Palliat Care, 2024; 23(1):290.
8.
AhmadM, Bani MohammadE, AnshasiHA. Virtual reality technology for pain and anxiety management among patients with cancer: A systematic review. Pain Manag Nurs, 2020; 21(6):601–607.
9.
GroningerH, AliN, GomesK, et al.A qualitative inquiry of patients using virtual reality to mitigate cancer pain. Am J Hosp Palliat Care, 2025; 42(11):1181–1186.
10.
WooJA, MaytalG, SternTA. Clinical challenges to the delivery of end-of-life care. Prim Care Companion J Clin Psychiatry, 2006; 8(6):367–372.
11.
HollandJM, CurrierJM, KirkendallA, et al.Sadness, anxiety, and experiences with emotional support among veteran and nonveteran patients and their families at the end of life. J Palliat Med, 2014; 17(6):708–711.
12.
ShamasT, Gillespie-HeymanS. Specialized palliative and hospice care and the importance of mourning our nation’s veterans. AMA J Ethics, 2018; 20(8):E787–E792.
13.
IntratorO, O’HanlonCE, MakineniR, et al.Comparing post-acute populations and care in veterans affairs and community nursing homes. J Am Med Dir Assoc, 2021; 22(12):2425–2431.e7.
14.
SchubertCC, PerkinsAJ, MyersLJ, et al.Effectiveness of the VA-geriatric resources for assessment and care of elders (VA-GRACE) program: An observational cohort study. J Am Geriatr Soc, 2022; 70(12):3598–3609.
15.
SharplesS, CobbS, MoodyA, et al.Virtual reality induced symptoms and effects (VRISE): Comparison of head mounted display (HMD), desktop and projection display systems. Displays, 2008; 29(2):58–69.
16.
MahoneyFI, BarthelDW. FUNCTIONAL EVALUATION: THE BARTHEL INDEX. Md State Med J, 1965; 14:61–65.
17.
BouwstraH, SmitEB, WattelEM, et al.Measurement properties of the barthel index in geriatric rehabilitation. J Am Med Dir Assoc, 2019; 20(4):420–425.e1.
18.
HjermstadMJ, FayersPM, HaugenDF, et al.; European Palliative Care Research Collaborative (EPCRC). Studies comparing numerical rating scales, verbal rating scales, and visual analogue scales for assessment of pain intensity in adults: A systematic literature review. J Pain Symptom Manage, 2011; 41(6):1073–1093.
19.
DangS, DesirM, LambaS, et al.Recognizing the needs of high-need high-risk veterans. Clin Interv Aging, 2022; 17:1907–1918.
20.
MoutogiannisPP, ThriftJ, PopeJK, et al.A rapid review of the role of virtual reality in care delivery of palliative care and hospice. J Hosp Palliat Nurs, 2023; 25(6):300–308.
21.
MoJ, VickerstaffV, MintonO, et al.How effective is virtual reality technology in palliative care? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Palliat Med, 2022; 36(7):1047–1058.
22.
WildingR, Barbosa NevesB, WaycottJ, et al.Introducing virtual reality to older adults: A qualitative analysis of a co-design innovation with care staff. Arch Gerontol Geriatr, 2024; 125:105505.
23.
ChazeF, HaydenL, AzevedoA, et al.Virtual reality and well-being in older adults: Results from a pilot implementation of virtual reality in long-term care. J Rehabil Assist Technol Eng, 2022; 9:20556683211072384.
24.
AfifiT, CollinsNL, RandK, et al.Testing the feasibility of virtual reality with older adults with cognitive impairments and their family members who live at a distance. Innov Aging, 2021; 5(2):igab014.
25.
GreinacherA, Alt-EppingB, GerlachC, et al.Expected benefits and concerns regarding virtual reality in caring for terminally ill cancer patients - A qualitative interview study. BMC Palliat Care, 2024; 23(1):254.
26.
PoetarCR, BradleyN, VoinescuA. Immersive virtual reality or computerised mindfulness meditation for improving mood? Preliminary efficacy from a pilot randomised trial. Front Psychol, 2023; 14:1157469.
27.
SeabrookE, KellyR, FoleyF, et al.Understanding how virtual reality can support mindfulness practice: Mixed methods study. J Med Internet Res, 2020; 22(3):e16106.
28.
YeoNL, WhiteMP, AlcockI, et al.What is the best way of delivering virtual nature for improving mood? An experimental comparison of high definition TV, 360° video, and computer generated virtual reality. J Environ Psychol, 2020; 72:101500.
29.
ZhangD, LuQ, LiL, et al.Loneliness in nursing homes: A qualitative meta-synthesis of older people’s experiences. J Clin Nurs, 2023; 32(19–20):7062–7075.
30.
AppelL, AliS, NaragT, et al.Virtual reality to promote wellbeing in persons with dementia: A scoping review. J Rehabil Assist Technol Eng, 2021; 8:20556683211053952.
MelekinA, SenguptaM., Ph.D., and CaffreyC. Residential Care Community Resident Characteristics: United States, 2022. National Center Health Statistics (U.S.); 2024.
33.
GarrettB, TavernerT, GromalaD, et al.Virtual reality clinical research: Promises and challenges. JMIR Serious Games, 2018; 6(4):e10839.
34.
PrestonAM, BrownL, PadalaKP, et al.Veterans affairs health care provider perceptions of virtual reality: Brief exploratory survey. Interact J Med Res, 2022; 11(2):e38490.
35.
KouijzerM, KipH, BoumanYHA, et al.Implementation of virtual reality in healthcare: A scoping review on the implementation process of virtual reality in various healthcare settings. Implement Sci Commun, 2023; 4(1):67.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
