Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Offering recreational amenities for guests is one way in which hotel operators compete for guests and increased revenues. Unfortunately, accidents and injuries to guests sometimes result from engaging in such activities. While certain risks may be curtailed through prudent operation and maintenance of equipment, operators may be able to insulate themselves from liability in certain instances through the use of exculpatory clauses. This article reviews the legal environment of exculpatory clauses as it relates to recreational activities and considers the implications for the lodging industry. It addresses, as well, limitation of liability for injuries resulting from the use of recreational equipment and services which are offered apart from the limited services traditionally associated with room rentals. In many instances, exculpatory clauses remain a legitimate method to reduce the risk of liability associated with many types of amusement and recreational activities offered by the hospitality industry.

Keywords

Key Words: exculpatory clauses recreational activities,liability negligence public policy waiver.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Am. Jur. 2d, Hotels, § 126 (1968).

Am. Jur. 2d, Infants, § 58 (1992).

Am. Jur. 2d, Infants, § 65 (1992).

ALR 4th 632, § 2 [a] (1987).

Baker v. Seattle, 79 Wash. 2d 198, 484 P.2d 405 (1971).

Brown v. Postal Telegraph Co., 111 N.C. 187, 16 S.E. 179 (1892).

Cava, A. , & Weisner, D. (1988). Rationalizing a decade of judicial responses to exculpatory clauses. Santa Clara Law Review, 28, 611-657.

Celli v. Sports Car Club of America,lnc.,29 Cal.App.3d511,105 Cal. Rptr.904,909(1972).

Conservatorship of the Estate of Link v. National Association for Stock Car Auto Racing, Inc., 158 Cal. App. 3d 138, 205 Cal. Rptr. 513, 514 (1984).

10.

Corbin on contracts, Section 1472 (3rd ed.) (1962).

11.

Corpus juris secundum, Contracts, Sec. 133 (2), (1992).

12.

Dumezv. HarborJet Ski, Inc.,117 Misc. 2d 249, 458 N.Y.S. 2d 119 (Sup. Ct. Niagara County, 1982).

13.

First Fin. Ins. Co. v. Purolator Sec. Inc., 69 III. App. 3d 413,388 N.E. 2d 17 (1979).

14.

Franczek v. Calspan, 78 A.D. 2d 134, 434 N.Y.S. 2d 288 (Sup. Ct. Erie County, 1980).

15.

Goyings v. Jack and Ruth Eckerd Foundation, 403 So. 2d 1144,1147 (2nd Fla. DCA 1981).

16.

Gross v. Sweet, 424 N.Y.S. 2d 365, 400 N.E. 2d 306 (1979) at 368.

17.

Hill v. Carolina Freight, 235 N.C. 705, 71 S.E. 2d 133 (1952).

18.

Jankle v. Texas, 88 Utah 325, 54 P. 2d 425 (1936).

19.

Marshall, A. (1990, September 10). Offer recreational activities, but remember risk. Hotel and Motel Management, p. 24.

20.

Meier v. Ma-Do Bars, Inc., 484 N.Y.S.2d 719 (A.D. 3 Dept. 1985).

21.

Moss v. Fortune, 207 Tenn. 426, 340 SW 2d 902 (1960) [quoted in Amusements-Exculpatory Agreement, 8 ALR 3d 1397 (1975)].

22.

New York General Obligations Law, § 5-326 (McKinney 1977).

23.

O'Connell v. Walt Disney World Co., 413 So. 2d 444 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 5, 1982).

24.

Papalalos v. Shaka, 91 N.H. 265, 18 A. 2d pp. 377-379 (1946).

25.

Randle v. Hinckley Parachute Center, Inc., 490 N.E. 2d 1041, (III. App. 2 Dist. 1986)

26.

Schutkowski v. Carey, 725 P. 2d 1057 (Wyo. 1986).

27.

Seaquist, G. , & Barken, M.E. (1990, July). Drafting effective exculpatory clauses. New York State Bar Journal, 54-65.

28.

Shielding against future negligence liability: The role of exculpatory contract provisions in personal injury actions. (1985). Western State University Law Review, 12, 819-833.

29.

Taking the tort out with a contract: Liability release contracts in California . (1988). Western State University Law Review , 15, 781-785.

30.

Tunkl v. Regents of University of California, 60 Cal. 2d 92, 385 P. 2d 441, (1963).

31.

Williston on contracts, Sections 1750, 1751 (4th ed.) (1972).

Exculpatory Clauses: Legal Environment and Implications for the Hospitality Industry

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References