The purpose of this study was to investigate the efficiency, effectiveness, and
impact of a trainee's control over the pace of instruction when using interactive video
(IV). The study revealed that the interactive video training program designed for this
study was as effective and significantly more efficient than a successful traditional
training program commonly used for sanitary food handling and personal hygiene
training. Pre- and post-test scores were compared between the control and experi
mental groups. In addition, an outcome not originally designed as a part of this study
emerged from placing students in small groups as they used the interactive systems.
Scores and time to train were analyzed, comparing those who trained individually
and those who trained in groups. It was discovered that students grouped on
interactive hardware scored higher than those who trained alone.
Barsky, J.D., & Dittman, S. (1990). Theory S.: Total customer service. The Cornell Hotel and Restaurant Administration Quarterly, 32(1), 98-95.
2.
Clark, J.D. (1984). How do interactive videodiscs rate against other media? Instructional Innovator, 30(1), 12-16.
3.
Daft, R. (1986). Organization theory and design (2nd ed.) St. Paul: West Publishing.
4.
Dalton, D.W. (1990). The effects of cooperative learning strategies on achievement and attitudes during interactive video. Journal of Computer-Based Instruction, 17(1), 8-16.
5.
DeBloois, M. (1984). Effectiveness of interactive videodisc training: A comprehensive review. The Videodisc Monitor. Learning Link Corporation of Future Systems Incorporated.
6.
Dick, W., & Carey, L. (1985). The systematic design ofinstruction (2nd ed.). Illinois: Scott, Foresman.
Fisher, A. (1987). Personnel training programs explain technology with precision. Administrative Management, 48(4), 17-21.
9.
Gagne, R.M. (1974). Essentials of learning. Illinois : The Dryden Press.
10.
Hannafin, M.J., & Calamaio, M.E. (1987). The effects oflocus ofinstructional control and practice on learning from interactive video. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association of Educational Communication and Technology, Atlanta, GA.
11.
Hannafin, M.J., & Peck, K.L. (1988). The design, development, and evaluation of instructional software. New York: Macmillan.
12.
Hannafin, M.J., & Reiber, L.P. (1989). Psychological foundations of instructional design for emerging computer-based instructional technologies: Part II. ETR&D, 37(2),102-114.
13.
Hosie, P. (1987). Adopting interactive videodisc technology for education. Educational Technology, 27(7), 5-10.
14.
Keller, J. (1991). MultiMedia solutions. IBM Corporation , 5(5), 76.
15.
Kinzie, M.B. (1990). Requirements and benefits of effective interactive instruction: Learner control, self-regulation, and continuing motivation. ETR&D, 38(1), 1-21.
Lewis, R.C., & Dev, C.S. (1991). Targeting service to your customer. The Cornell Hotel and Restaurant Administration Quarterly, 32(2), 18-28.
18.
Magel, M. (1986). Decision criteria for going interactive. Video Systems, 10, 42-54.
19.
Martorella, P. (1983). Interactive video systems in the classroom. Social Education, 47(5), 325-327.
20.
Melton, R.F. (1990). The changing face of educational technology. Educational Technology, 9, 26-31.
21.
Miller, H.B. (1989). Study on interactive training among state employees . Unpublished manuscript. Clemson University, Clemson, NC.
22.
Naiman, A. (1987, December). A hard look at educational software . BYTE, 193-200.
23.
Educational Foundation, National Restaurant Association. (1985). Food service sanitation: A certification coursebook (3rd ed.). New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
24.
Neff, R. (1987, December). Videos are starring in more and more training programs. BYTE, pp. 193-200.
25.
Rhodes, D.M., & Azbell, J.W. (1987). The CAIV syndrome: Treatment and prevention. Educational Media and Technology: Some Challenges and Case Studies , 11(7), 47-56.
26.
Romiszowski, A.J. (1989). Avoiding failure through better project planning and analysis: Case studies of avoidable failure in instructional systems design and development projects. ETTI, 26(2), 95-111.2
27.
Schaffer, L.C., & Hannafin, M.J. (1985). The effects of progressive interactivity on learning from interactive video. ECTJ, 34(2), 89-96.
28.
Smith, E.E. (1987). Interactive video: An examination of use and effectiveness . Journal of Instructional Development, 10(2), 2-10.
29.
Stender, S.A. (1986). Training on videodiscs. Video Systems, 10, 68-81.
30.
Ullmer, E.J. (1989). High-tech instructional development: It's the thought that counts. ETR&D, 37(3), 95-101.
31.
Yaworski, D. (1986). Producing for interactive video. Video Systems, 10, 82-85.
32.
Young, J.I., & Schlieve, P.L. (1984). Videodisc simulation: Training for the future. Educational Technology, 24(4), 41-42.
