Abstract
An expert panel of 12 hospitality program deans, department heads, and directors (CEOs) and 28 members of their advisory committees rated 60 statements identified as advisory committee activities. Panel members reached consensus on 58 of 60 statements after three survey mailings using the Delphi technique, a process for determining group consensus.
The expert panel strongly agreed with six statements and disagreed with four statements. T-tests identified 10 statements where a significant difference (p=<.05) in agreement occurred between the CEOs and the advisory committee members. Three of those statements were financial issues, two were identifying research and training needs, and another was evaluating the hospitality education program. Advisory committee members indicated that they should be consulted regarding curriculum, subject matter, special training needs, and developing educational objectives.
CEOs currently using or planning to use an advisory committee should carefully review the statement ratings to identify those activities with which they can expect the most support and those that are potentially the most controversial. Key Words: hospitality education programs, advisory committee, Delphi technique.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
