Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This article outlines the history of and the current trends in dram shop legislation throughout the United States. It will be seen that the term "dram shop" law can have extremely divergent meanings from state to state. In part, this is because such laws are designed to address competing and difficult-to-reconcile public policies. On the one hand, there is the public interest in curbing the incidence and consequences of drunk driving, which is an argument in favor of increasing the liability of alcohol vendors and servers. On the other, there is the public interest in keeping insurance available and its costs under control, which indicates a policy of reducing the liability of those in the hospitality industry and thus decreasing their exposure (and, hence, the exposure of their insurance carriers) to insured risks. The purpose of this article is to explain these competing policies and to show how the states are currently balancing them in enacting or amending their dram shop laws. Those in the hospitality industry will then be better able to predict and, through informed participation in the legislative process, influence the direction of this important area of the law. Key Words: Dram shop laws, liquor liability, drunk driving, tort reform, public policy.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alabama Code Sections 6-5-70, 6-5-71 (1989).

Alaska Statute Sections 04.16.030, 04.16.051, 04.21.020 (1989).

Arizona Revised Statutes Annotated Section 4-311 (1989).

Barboza v. Decas, 311 Mass. 10, 40 N. E. 2d 10 (1942).

Bracke, A.J. (1988). The evolution of dram shop law: Is Kentucky keeping up with the nation? Kentucky Law Review, 15, 539-558.

Brigance v. Dove Restaurant 725 P.2d 200 (Okla. 1986).

California Business and Professional Code Secs. 25602, 25602.1 (West, 1989).

California Civil Code Section 1714 (1989).

Christiansen v. Campbell 328 S. E. 2d 351 (S. C. App. 1985).

10.

Cimino v. Milford Keg, Inc. 385 Mass. 323, 431 N. E. 2d 920 (1982).

11.

Colorado Revised Statute Section 12-47-128.5, 13-21-103 (1989).

12.

Connecticut General Statute Section 30-102 (1989).

13.

District of Columbia Code Annotated Section 25-121 (1989).

14.

El Chico Corp. v. Poole 732 S.W.2d 306 (Texas 1987).

15.

Elder v. Fisher 247 Ind. 598, 217 N.E.2d 847 (1966).

16.

Erickson, J.R. & Hamilton, D.H. (1983). Liability of commercial vendors, employers and social hosts for torts of the intoxicated. Wake Forest Law Review, 19, 1013-1048.

17.

Florida Statutes Annotated Section 768.128 ( West, 1989).

18.

Georgia Code Annotated Section 51-1-40 (1989).

19.

Hutchinson v. Mitchell 101 S.E.2d 73 (W. Va. 1957).

20.

Idaho Code Section 23-808 (1989).

21.

Illinois Revised Statute Chapter 43, Section 135 (1989).

22.

Indiana Code Section 7.1-5-10-15.5 (1989).

23.

Insurance Information Institute, Property/Casualty Facts ( 1990).

24.

Iowa Code Annotated Section 123.49(1) (1989).

25.

Kavorkian v. Tommy's Elbow Room 711 P.2d 160 (Alaska 1985).

26.

Maine Revised Statutes Annotated Title 28-A, Section 2501-2516 ( 1989).

27.

Maroney, P. , Nelson, J. & Perrewe, P. (1990, June). Modification of the collateral source rule: The effect on jury awards. The Journal of Insurance Regulation , 8(4), 408-421.

28.

Massachusetts General Laws Annotated Chapter 231, Section 85T ( West, 1989).

29.

Meade v. Freeman 93 Idaho 389, 462 P.2d 54 (1969).

30.

Michigan Comp. Laws Annotated Section 436.22(1 ), (3)-(11), (1989).

31.

Minnesota Statute Annotated Sections 340A.801-340A.802 (West, 1989).

32.

Mishky, E.J. (1984). The liability of providers of alcohol: Dram shop acts. Pepperdine Law Review, 12, 177-213.

33.

Mississippi Code Annotated 67-3-73 (1989).

34.

Missouri Revised Statute 537.053 (1989).

35.

Montana Code Annotated 27-1-710 (1989).

36.

Naples v. Chinese Palace, Inc., 89 So. 2d 159 (Ala. 1980).

37.

New Hampshire Statute Annotated 507-F:1-8 (1989).

38.

New Jersey Statute Annotated 2A:22A-1-7 (West, 1989).

39.

New Mexico Statute Annotated 41-11-1, 60-7B-1 (1989).

40.

New York General Obligation Laws 11-100, 11-101 (McKinney, 1989).

41.

Nolan v. Morelli 154 Conn. 432, 226 A.2d 383 (1967).

42.

North Carolina General Statute 18B-120-129 (1989).

43.

North Dakota Cent. Code Section 5-01 (1989).

44.

Ogilvie, R.B. (1958). History and appraisal of the Illinois dram shop act. University of Illinois Law Review, 1958 , 175-190.

45.

Ohio Revised Code Annotated 4399.01, 4399.18 (1989).

46.

O'Neal, B. (1988, August 2). Statement before U.S. Senate Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation. Washington, DC : Institute for Highway Safety.

47.

Ono v. Applegate 612 P.2d 533 (Hawaii 1980).

48.

Oregon Revised Statute 30.950, 30.960 (1989).

49.

Pennsylvania Statute Annotated Title 47, Section 4-497 (1989).

50.

Phillips v. Derrick, 54 So. 2d 320 (Ala. 1951).

51.

Ramsey v. Anctie, 106 N. H. 375, 211 A.2d 900 (1965).

52.

Rappaport v. Nichols, 31 N. J. 188, 156 A.2d 1 (1959).

53.

Reeves v. Bridges, 284 S. E. 2d 416 (Ga. 1981).

54.

Rhode Island General Laws 3-14-1 to 3-14-15 (1989).

55.

Richardson v. Carnegie Library Restaurant 763 P.2d 1153 (N. Mex. 1988).

56.

Seibel v. Leach, et al. 288 N.W. 774 (1939).

57.

State for Use of Joyce v. Hatfield 197 Md. 249, 254-255, 78 A. 2d 754, 756 (1951).

58.

State of Utah. (1982, November 5). The recommendations of the Governor's commission on drinking and driving. (Available from the State of Utah)

59.

Suffer v. Hutchings, 327 S. E. 2d 716 (Ga. 1985).

60.

Tennessee Code Annotated 57-10-101 (1989).

61.

Texas Alcoholic Beverage Code Annotated Section 2.01-2.03 (Vernon, 1989).

62.

Utah Code Annotated 32A-14-1 (1989).

63.

Vermont Statute Annotated Title 17, Section 501 (1989).

64.

Ward v. Rhodes, Hammond, and Beck, Inc. 511 So. 2d 159 (Ala. 1987).

65.

Waynick v. Chicago's Last Department Store 269 F.2d 322, (7th Cir., 1959).

66.

Wilson v. Steinbach 656 P. 2d 1030 (Wash. 1982).

67.

Wisconsin Statute 125.035 (1989).

68.

Wyoming Statute 12-5-502 (1989).

The Trends in Dram Shop Laws and How They Affect the Hospitality Industry: Balancing Competing Policy Considerations of Tort Reform and Curbing Drunk Driving

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References