Hospitality brands have increasingly embraced corporate sociopolitical activism (CSA), publicly taking a stance on controversial issues to align with evolving consumer values. Prior research has predominantly focused on the magnitude of brand-cause fit while overlooking the type of fit (natural fit vs. created fit). Through two experiments in hospitality settings (hotel and fast-food restaurant), this study examines how two key moderators—brand-consumer stance agreement and message framing—shape the effectiveness of different brand-cause fit types in CSA campaigns. Study 1 demonstrates that natural (vs. created) fit enhances perceived altruistic motives and consumer responses when consumers disagree with the brand’s stance, but this effect diminishes with agreement. Study 2 suggests that pairing a CSA message with positive framing and a natural fit (vs. created fit) maximizes CSA campaign effectiveness. These findings advance CSA literature in hospitality contexts and provide hospitality managers with strategic guidance for designing effective sociopolitical campaigns.
AlcañizE. B.CáceresR. C.PérezR. C. (2010). Alliances between brands and social causes: The influence of company credibility on social responsibility image. Journal of Business Ethics, 96, 169–186. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0461-x
AtangaB. A.MattilaA. S. (2023). Corporate sociopolitical activism (CSA): The role of perceived impact on consumer response to contribution type. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 113, Article 103506. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2023.103506
5.
AtangaB. A.XueX.MattilaA. S. (2022). The impact of Corporate Sociopolitical Activism (CSA) on brand attitude. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 107, Article 103290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2022.103290
6.
Becker-OlsenK.SimmonsC. J. (2002). When do social sponsorships enhance or dilute equity? Fit, message source, and the persistence of effects. Advances in Consumer Research, 29(1).
7.
BelarminoA.WhalenE. A.GuzzoR. F. (2024). The impact of message framing on perceptions of controversial CSR in hotels. International Hospitality Review. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1108/IHR-12-2022-0062
8.
BergkvistL.ZhouK. Q. (2018). Cause-related marketing persuasion research: An integrated framework and directions for further research. International Journal of Advertising, 38(1), 5–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2018.1452397
9.
BhagwatY.WarrenN. L.BeckJ. T.WatsonG. F.IV. (2020). Corporate sociopolitical activism and firm value. Journal of Marketing, 84(5), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022242920937000
10.
BignéE.Currás-PérezR.Aldás-ManzanoJ. (2012). Dual nature of cause-brand fit: Influence on corporate social responsibility consumer perception. European Journal of Marketing, 46(3/4), 575–594. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090561211202620
11.
BizerG. Y.PettyR. E. (2005). How we conceptualize our attitudes matters: The effects of valence framing on the resistance of political attitudes. Political Psychology, 26(4), 553–568. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2005.00431.x
12.
BogicevicV.LiY.SalvatoE. D. (2023). Tokenism in the workplace: Does brand activism benefit LGBTQ+ employees in the hospitality industry?International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 35(11), 3922–3949. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-11-2022-1366
13.
ChenZ.BergerJ. (2013). When, why, and how controversy causes conversation. Journal of Consumer Research, 40(3), 580–593. https://doi.org/10.1086/671465
14.
ChéronE.KohlbacherF.KusumaK. (2012). The effects of brand-cause fit and campaign duration on consumer perception of cause-related marketing in Japan. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 29(5), 357–368. https://doi.org/10.1108/07363761211247479
15.
ChoiS.MattilaA. S.Quadri-FelittiD. (2019). Donation appeals rewarding fitness in the context of CSR initiatives. Journal of Services Marketing, 33(2), 160–167. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSM-12-2017-0421
16.
ChoiJ.SeoS. (2019). When a stigmatized brand is doing good: The role of complementary fit and brand equity in cause-related marketing. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 31(9), 3447–3464. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSM-12-2017-0421
17.
Cordero-GutiérrezR.AljarahA.LópezM.Lahuerta-OteroE. (2024). Make me happy, make it credible – The effect of CSR message framing on online brand engagement. Management Decision, 62(2), 532–548. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-01-2023-0049
18.
DasN.GuhaA.BiswasA.KrishnanB. (2016). How product–cause fit and donation quantifier interact in cause-related marketing (CRM) settings: Evidence of the cue congruency effect. Marketing Letters, 27, 295–308. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-014-9338-6
19.
DiRussoC.BuckleyC.DiddiP.DardisF. E.VafeiadisM.EngN. (2022). Designing effective corporate social advocacy campaigns using valence, arousal, and issue salience. Public Relations Review, 48(3), Article 102207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2022.102207
20.
EdringtonC. L.LeeN. (2018). Tweeting a social movement: Black Lives Matter and its use of Twitter to share information, build community, and promote action. The Journal of Public Interest Communications, 2(2), Article 289. https://doi.org/10.32473/jpic.v2.i2.p289
21.
FanA.WuL.KingC.MattilaA. S. (2024). Empowering HER: Harnessing the power of ideological value fit and leadership diversity in female talent acquisition. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/10963480251319974
22.
FanX.DengN.QianY.DongX. (2022). Factors affecting the effectiveness of cause-related marketing: A meta-analysis. Journal of Business Ethics, 175, 339–360. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-020-04639-6
FolseJ. A. G.GrauS. L.MoulardJ. G.PoundersK. (2014). Cause-related marketing: Factors promoting campaign evaluations. Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising, 35(1), 50–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/10641734.2014.866847
26.
FolseJ. A. G.NiedrichR. W.GrauS. L. (2010). Cause-relating marketing: The effects of purchase quantity and firm donation amount on consumer inferences and participation intentions. Journal of Retailing, 86(4), 295–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretai.2010.02.005
27.
GaoY. L.MattilaA. S. (2014). Improving consumer satisfaction in green hotels: The roles of perceived warmth, perceived competence, and CSR motive. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 42, 20–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2014.06.003
28.
GortonM.AngellR.WhiteJ.TsengY. S. (2013). Understanding consumer responses to retailers’ cause related voucher schemes: Evidence from the UK grocery sector. European Journal of Marketing, 47(11/12), 1931–1953. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-06-2011-0286
29.
GrauS. L.FolseJ. A. G. (2007). Cause-related marketing (CRM): The influence of donation proximity and message-framing cues on the less-involved consumer. Journal of Advertising, 36(4), 19–33. https://doi.org/10.2753/JOA0091-3367360402
30.
GuptaR.HurY. J.LavieN. (2016). Distracted by pleasure: Effects of positive versus negative valence on emotional capture under load. Emotion, 16(3), 328–337. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/emo0000112
31.
GuzmánF.DavisD. (2017). The impact of corporate social responsibility on brand equity: Consumer responses to two types of fit. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 26(5), 435–446. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBM-06-2015-0917
32.
GuzzoR. F.CobosL.VargasD. (2023). Taking a stand: Understanding the use of socially controversial CSR in hospitality recruitment. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 111, Article 103488. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2023.103488
33.
HauptM.WannowS.MarquardtL.GraubnerJ. S.HaasA. (2023). Who is more responsive to brand activism? The role of consumer-brand identification and political ideology in consumer responses to activist brand messages. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 32(8), 1248–1273. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBM-10-2022-4193
34.
HayesA. F. (2017). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. Guilford Publications.
35.
HoekJ.GendallP. (2008). An analysis of consumers’ responses to cause related marketing. Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing, 20(2), 283–297. https://doi.org/10.1080/10495140802224977
36.
HofstedeG. (2011). Dimensionalizing cultures: The Hofstede model in context. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 2(1), Article 8. https://doi.org/10.9707/2307-0919.1014
37.
HuangY.LiuW. (2022). Promoting COVID-19 vaccination: The interplay of message framing, psychological uncertainty, and public agency as a message source. Science Communication, 44(1), 3–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/10755470211048192
38.
HuangY.MaE. (Jintao)WangD. (2021). Message framing strategies, food waste prevention, and diners’ repatronage intentions: The mediating role of corporate social responsibility. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 29(10), 1694–1715. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2020.1867151
39.
ItoT.CacioppoJ. (2005). Variations on a human universal: Individual differences in positivity offset and negativity bias. Cognition & Emotion, 19(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930441000120
40.
KangE. Y.AtkinsonL. (2021). Effects of message objectivity and focus on green CSR communication: The strategy development for a hotel’s green CSR message. Journal of Marketing Communications, 27(3), 229–249. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527266.2019.1640270
41.
KellerK. L.AakerD. A. (1992). The effects of sequential introduction of brand extensions. Journal of Marketing Research, 29(1), 35–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224379202900104
42.
KochA.AlvesH.KrügerT.UnkelbachC. (2016). A general valence asymmetry in similarity: Good is more alike than bad. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 42(8), 1171–1192. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000243
43.
KuoA.RiceD. H. (2015). The impact of perceptual congruence on the effectiveness of cause-related marketing campaigns. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 25(1), 78–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2014.06.002
44.
LaffertyB. A. (2007). The relevance of fit in a cause–brand alliance when consumers evaluate corporate credibility. Journal of Business Research, 60(5), 447–453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2006.09.030
45.
LaffertyB. A. (2009). Selecting the right cause partners for the right reasons: The role of importance and fit in cause-brand alliances. Psychology & Marketing, 26(4), 359–382. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20277
LangA. (2006). Using the limited capacity model of motivated mediated message processing to design effective cancer communication messages. Journal of Communication, 56, S57–S80. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00283.x
48.
LiY.YuX.QiR.PetrickJ. (2025). Women empowerment in restaurants: Effects of femvertising, purplewashing and feminist identity on consumers’ willingness to pay a premium. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 37(2), 580–601. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-03-2024-0398
MaheswaranD.Meyers-LevyJ. (1990). The influence of message framing and issue involvement. Journal of Marketing Research, 27(3), 361–367. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224379002700310
51.
MendiniM.PeterP. C.GibbertM. (2018). The dual-process model of similarity in cause-related marketing: How taxonomic versus thematic partnerships reduce skepticism and increase purchase willingness. Journal of Business Research, 91, 195–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.06.010
52.
Meyers-LevyJ.MaheswaranD. (2004). Exploring message framing outcomes when systematic, heuristic, or both types of processing occur. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 14(1–2), 159–167. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327663jcp1401&2_18
53.
MukherjeeS.AlthuizenN. (2020). Brand activism: Does courting controversy help or hurt a brand?International Journal of Research in Marketing, 37(4), 772–788. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2020.02.008
54.
NalickM.JosefyM.ZardkoohiA.BiermanL. (2016). Corporate sociopolitical involvement: A reflection of whose preferences?Academy of Management Perspectives, 30(4), 384–403. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2015.0033
55.
PankiwS. A.PhillipsB. J.WilliamsD. E. (2021). Luxury brands’ use of CSR and femvertising: The case of jewelry advertising. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 24(3), 302–325. https://doi.org/10.1108/QMR-05-2020-0061
56.
PasirayiS.FennellP. B.FollmerK. B. (2023). # Activism: Investor reactions to corporate sociopolitical activism. Business & Society, 62(4), 704–744. https://doi.org/10.1177/00076503221110457
57.
PelozaJ.ShangJ. (2011). How can corporate social responsibility activities create value for stakeholders? A systematic review. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 39, 117–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-010-0213-6
58.
PietriE. S.FazioR. H.ShookN. J. (2013). Weighting positive versus negative: The fundamental nature of valence asymmetry. Journal of Personality, 81(2), 196–208. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2012.00800.x
59.
PimentelP. C.Bassi-SuterM.DidonetS. R. (2024). Brand activism as a marketing strategy: An integrative framework and research agenda. Journal of Brand Management, 31(2), 212–234. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41262-023-00335-8
60.
PriesterJ. R.PettyR. E. (2003). The influence of spokesperson trustworthiness on message elaboration, attitude strength, and advertising effectiveness. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 13(4), 408–421. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327663JCP1304_08
61.
RifonN. J.Taylor QuilliamE.PaekH. J.WeatherspoonL. J.KimS. K.SmrekerK. C. (2014). Age-dependent effects of food advergame brand integration and interactivity. International Journal of Advertising, 33(3), 475–508. https://doi.org/10.2501/IJA-33-3-475-508
62.
RobinsonS. R.IrmakC.JayachandranS. (2012). Choice of cause in cause-related marketing. Journal of Marketing, 76(4), 126–139. https://doi.org/10.1509/jm.09.0589
63.
RozinP.RoyzmanE. B. (2001). Negativity bias, negativity dominance, and contagion. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5(4), 296–320. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327957PSPR0504_2
64.
SahinS.BalogluS.TopcuogluE. (2019). The influence of green message types on advertising effectiveness for luxury and budget hotel segments. Cornell Hospitality Quarterly, 61(4), 443–460. https://doi.org/10.1177/1938965519892189
65.
SchampC.HeitmannM.BijmoltT. H.KatzensteinR. (2023). The effectiveness of cause-related marketing: A meta-analysis on consumer responses. Journal of Marketing Research, 60(1), 189–215. https://doi.org/10.1177/00222437221109782
66.
SenS.BhattacharyaC. B.KorschunD. (2006). The role of corporate social responsibility in strengthening multiple stakeholder relationships: A field experiment. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 34(2), 158–166. https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070305284978
67.
ShenL. (2015). Antecedents to psychological reactance: The impact of threat, message frame, and choice. Health Communication, 30(10), 975-985. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2014.910882
68.
ShuklaP.Rosendo-RiosV.KhalifaD. (2025). Should global brands engage in brand activism?Journal of International Marketing, 33(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069031X241270606
69.
SimmonsC. J.Becker-OlsenK. L. (2006). Achieving marketing objectives through social sponsorships. Journal of Marketing, 70(4), 154–169. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.70.4.154
70.
SkarmeasD.LeonidouC. N. (2013). When consumers doubt, watch out! The role of CSR skepticism. Journal of Business Research, 66(10), 1831–1838. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.02.004
71.
SpillerS. A.FitzsimonsG. J.LynchJ. G.Jr.McClellandG. H. (2013). Spotlights, floodlights, and the magic number zero: Simple effects tests in moderated regression. Journal of Marketing Research, 50(2), 277–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.02.004
72.
StadlthannerK. A.AndreuL.RibeiroM. A.FontX.MattilaA. S. (2022). The effects of message framing in CSR advertising on consumers’ emotions, attitudes, and behavioral intentions. Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management, 31(7), 777–796. https://doi.org/10.1080/19368623.2022.2065399
73.
TaoY.WangC.ZhangT. C.ZhaiL.GaoY.LiuJ. (2024). CSR communication in hospitality: Fostering hotel guests’ climate (change) engagement. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 60, 264–276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhtm.2024.06.016
VredenburgJ.KapitanS.SpryA.KemperJ. A. (2020). Brands taking a stand: Authentic brand activism or woke washing?Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 39(4), 444–460. https://doi.org/10.1177/0743915620947359
76.
WangB.LiuS. Q.KandampullyJ.BujisicM. (2020). How color affects the effectiveness of taste-versus health-focused restaurant advertising messages. Journal of Advertising, 49(5), 557–574. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2020.1809575
77.
WangY.BouroncleL. (2024). To trust or not to trust: consumer perceptions of corporate sociopolitical activism. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly, 87(3), 488–510. https://doi.org/10.1177/23294906231166141
78.
XueJ.MattilaA. S. (2024). Instant karma: How the karmic-investment mindset affects customer engagement with corporate charitable giving requests. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research, 48(4), 770–782. https://doi.org/10.1177/10963480221137779
79.
XueX.MattilaA. S. (2024). True or performative allyship: A matter of perception in search of cause-related marketing authenticity. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 122, Article 103842. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2024.103842
80.
YoonD.KimY. K.FuR. J. (2020). How can hotels’ green advertising be persuasive to consumers? An information processing perspective. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 45, 511–519. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhtm.2020.10.014
81.
ZdravkovicS.MagnussonP.StanleyS. M. (2010). Dimensions of fit between a brand and a social cause and their influence on attitudes. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 27(2), 151–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2010.01.005
82.
ZhangQ.SappD. A. (2013). Psychological reactance and resistance intention in the classroom: Effects of perceived request politeness and legitimacy, relationship distance, and teacher credibility. Communication Education, 62(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2012.727008
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
