Principal–Agent Relationship Within a Cruise Supply Chain Model for China

Abstract

Changes in travelers’ booking habits and the evolution of technology have come to threaten the existence of traditional travel agents (TAs). However, the cruise industry still relies heavily on TAs as its main distribution channel. A qualitative study was conducted to investigate the networks, relationships, and power distribution between cruise companies and TAs using a triangulation method via a tourism supply chain model. Principal–agent (P-A) theory was taken as the framework to describe various parties’ relationships and roles. Several TA business models were identified, including group blocks (i.e., guaranteed and nonguaranteed) and charter cruises (i.e., retail for resale and corporate; meetings, incentives, conferences, and exhibitions). Results show an imbalance of power between parties due to unique business practices and customer preferences in Mainland China. Principals (i.e., cruise companies) were found to rely excessively on agents (i.e., TAs) to create demand, with the growing number of cruise lines leading agents to overpower principals. The alliance among TAs further affected the principal–agent relationship. A refined tourism supply chain model tailored to the cruise industry is thus proposed herein; this cruise supply chain model simplifies the complicated business network relationships between cruise companies and TAs in China.

Keywords

cruise tourism supply chain principal–agent theory travel agency distribution China

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Archibald

(2016). Investigator triangulation: A collaborative strategy with potential for mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 10(3), 228-250. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689815570092

Baum

Mudambi

(1996). Attracting hotel investment: Insights from principal-agent theory. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research, 20(2), 15-29. https://doi.org/10.1177/109634809602000202

Carter

Bryant-Lukosius

Dicenso

Blythe

Neville

(2014). The use of triangulation in qualitative research. Oncology Nursing Forum, 41(5), 545-547. https://doi.org/10.1188/14.ONF.545-547

Chan

(2017). Chinese International Travel Monitor 2017. https://www.tourismnewzealand.com/media/3011/citm-2017-report-english.pdf

Chen

Bolton

Lee

Wang

(2017). Culture, relationship norms, and dual entitlement. Journal of Consumer Research, 45(1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucx118

Chen

Mak

Guo

(2011). Zero-fare group tours in China: An analytic framework. Journal of China Tourism Research, 7(4), 425-444. https://doi.org/10.1080/19388160.2011.627024

China Travel Guide. (2019, July 30). History of China tourism and travel agencies. https://www.travelchinaguide.com/essential/identify-agency-history.htm

CLIA. (2018). 2018 Asia cruise trends. https://cruising.org/news-and-research/research/2018/december/asia-trends-2018-overview

CLIA. (2019). 2019 cruise trends and industry outlook. https://cruising.org/news-and-research/-/media/CLIA/Research/CLIA2019StateoftheIndustry.pdf

10.

Collinson

(2019, September 23). Why did Thomas Cook collapse after 178 years in business? The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/business/2019/sep/23/thomas-cook-as-the-world-turned-the-sun-ceased-to-shine-on-venerable-tour-operator

11.

Corgnet

Gómez-Miñambres

Hernán-González

(2018). Goal setting in the principal–agent model: Weak incentives for strong performance. Games and Economic Behavior, 109(May), 311-326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geb.2017.12.017

12.

Cripps

(2019, September 23). A history of Thomas Cook, one of the world’s oldest travel firms. https://edition.cnn.com/travel/article/thomas-cook-history-timeline/index.html

13.

Decrop

(1999). Triangulation in qualitative tourism research. Tourism Management, 20(1), 157-161. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0261-5177(98)00102-2

14.

Denzin

N. K.

(1978). The research act in sociology: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods. Transaction Publishers.

15.

Dichter

Chen

Saxon

Suo

(2018). Chinese tourists: Dispelling the myths: An in-depth look at China’s outbound tourist market. https://www.mckinsey.com/~/media/McKinsey/Industries/TravelTransportandLogistics/OurInsights/HuanyingtothenewChinesetraveler/Chinese-tourists-Dispelling-the-myths.ashx

16.

Everington

(2018, October 15). Norwegian cruise line to withdraw from China market after “damas” eat away profits. Taiwannews. https://www.taiwannews.com.tw/en/news/3552836

17.

Flick

(1992). Triangulation revisited: Strategy of validation or alternative? Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 22(2), 175-197. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5914.1992.tb00215.x

18.

Flick

Garms-Homolová

Herrmann

Kuck

Röhnsch

(2012). “I can’t prescribe something just because someone asks for it . . . ”: Using mixed methods in the framework of triangulation. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 6(2), 97-110. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689812437183

19.

Guba

Lincoln

(1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In Denzin

N. K.

Lincoln

Y. S.

(Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 105-117). Sage.

20.

Guo

Tang

(2015). Research on principal-agent problem of tourism attractions development: A case study of Kaiping Diaolou. Journal of Sustainable Development, 8(6), 119-126. https://doi.org/10.5539/jsd.v8n6p119

21.

Hahn

(2020). Industry 4.0: A supply chain innovation perspective. International Journal of Production Research, 58(5), 1425-1441. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2019.1641642

22.

Hammersley

(2008). Troubles with triangulation. In Advances in mixed methods research: Theories and applications (pp. 22-36). Sage.

23.

Harris

White

(2018). Agency theory. Oxford University Press. https://www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/acref/9780198796688.001.0001/acref-9780198796688-e-57?rskey=G2Zkru&result=63

24.

Hauser

Truong

(2012). Royal Caribbean: An IT based view. In Cruise management: Information and decision support systems. Gabler Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8349-7159-3

25.

Heath

(2015). Triangulation: Methodology. In International encyclopedia of the social and behavioral sciences (2nd ed., Vol. 24, pp. 639-644). https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.44059-6

26.

Heery

Noon

(2008). Principal-agent theory. In A Dictionary of Human Resource Management (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.

27.

Huang

Chen

(2004). A study of Taiwan’s travel agent salary system: An agency theory perspective. Tourism Management, 25(4), 483-490. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0261-5177(03)00118-3

28.

Jensen

Meckling

(1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(1), 305-360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X

29.

Zhang

(2017). 基于多任务委托代理模型的导游激励问题研究 [Study on tour guides’ incentive problems in tourism management based on multi-task principal-agent model]. 运筹与管理, 26(02), 158-164.

30.

Liu

Xin

(2013). 旅游项目投资资本介入研究——基于委托代理理论的视角 [Research on capital intervention of tourism project—from the view of principal and agent theory]. 旅游论坛, 6(4), 59-63.

31.

Marriott News Centre. (2019, September 17). Expedia group signs industry-first agreement to become optimized distributor of Marriott International wholesale rates. https://news.marriott.com/news/2019/09/17/expedia-group-signs-industry-first-agreement-to-become-optimized-distributor-of-marriott-international-wholesale-rates

32.

Martikke

Weisser

(2012). Cruise passenger choice behavior analysis and implications for service design. In Cruise management: Information and decision support systems (pp. 1-18). Gabler Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8349-7159-3

33.

Mentzer

DeWitt

Keebler

Min

Nix

Smith

Zacharia

(2001). Defining supply chain management. Journal of Business Logistics, 22(2), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2158-1592.2001.tb00001.x

34.

Mitnick

(2006). Origin of the theory of agency. http://www.pitt.edu/~mitnick/agencytheory/agencytheoryoriginrev11806r.htm

35.

Munksgaard

Stentoft

Paulraj

(2014). Value-based supply chain innovation. Advancing Practice through Theory, 7(3), 50-62. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12063-014-0092-y

36.

Oppermann

(2000). Triangulation: A methodological discussion. International Journal of Tourism Research, 2(2), 141-145. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1522-1970(200003/04)2:2<141::AID-JTR217>3.0.CO

37.

Preen

(2019, April 3). China’s reforms and opening-up: Future prospects. China Briefing. https://www.china-briefing.com/news/economic-reform-china-opening-up-future-prospects/

38.

SCMP. (2013). SCM definitions and glossary of terms. https://cscmp.org/CSCMP/Educate/SCM_Definitions_and_Glossary_of_Terms/CSCMP/Educate/SCM_Definitions_and_Glossary_of_Terms.aspx

39.

Shavell

(1979). Risk sharing and incentives in the principal and agent relationship. Bell Journal of Economics, 10(1), 55-73. https://doi.org/10.2307/3003319

40.

Siriphon

Zhu

(2018). Outbound tourists and policy reforms under the Chinese mobility regime. In China’s reforms in the new era and their implications for East Asia (pp. 1-29). Academic Press.

41.

Sorrells

(2019, January 14). Inside cruise, part 2: Digging into distribution. PhocusWire https://www.phocuswire.com/Cruise-series-part-2-distribution

42.

Steele

Scherrer

(2018). Flipping the principal-agent model to foster host community participation in monitoring and evaluation of volunteer tourism programmes. Tourism Recreation Research, 43(3), 321-334. https://doi.org/10.1080/02508281.2018.1457251

43.

Sun

(2016). “Low price dilemma” in China cruise market: Analysis on the price formation mechanism. Tourism Tribune, 31(11), 107-116. https://www.cabdirect.org/cabdirect/abstract/20173010593

44.

Tse

Hobson

(2008). The forces shaping China’s outbound tourism. Journal of China Tourism Research, 4(2), 136-155. https://doi.org/10.1080/19388160802279459

45.

Yao

(2016, November 25). Cheer U islands: A brand-new travel mode for Chinese. GlobeNewswire. https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2016/11/25/892803/0/en/Cheer-U-Islands-A-Brand-new-Travel-Mode-for-Chinese.html

46.

Zhang

Song

Huang

(2009). Tourism supply chain management: A new research agenda. Tourism Management, 30(3), 345-358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2008.12.010

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.18 MB