Determining the Importance of Stopover Destination Attributes: Integrating Stated Importance,Choice Experiment,and Eye-Tracking Measures

Abstract

Stopover tourism is an important but neglected area of study. This article combines a discrete choice experiment with eye-tracking measures and self-stated attribute importance ratings to analyze stopover destination preferences. A sample of Australian residents shows safety is the most critical determinant of stopover destination attractiveness based on both the importance ratings and choice model results, but that it does not receive the greatest amount of visual attention. Seven attributes showed little consistency between the methods. However, when the measures are combined into one choice model, there are insights into associations between ratings, amounts of visual attention, and the final impact of an attribute on the choice outcome. Findings indicate the overall importance of each attribute and show how attribute importance varies across the sample and during the choice process. The article thus illustrates how different measures can be combined to study preferences for destination attributes in a specific travel context.

Keywords

stopover travel situation DMO attribute importance choice experiment eye-tracking

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Balcombe

Fraser

McSorley

(2015). Visual attention and attribute attendance in multi-attribute choice experiments. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 30(3), 447-467. https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.2383

Bogomolova

Oppewal

Cohen

Yao

(2020). How the layout of a unit price label affects eye-movements and product choice: An eye-tracking investigation. Journal of Business Research, 111(April), 102-116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.10.049

Goodrich

J. N.

(1978). The relationship between preferences for and perceptions of vacation destinations: Application of a choice model. Journal of Travel Research, 17(2), 8-13. https://doi.org/10.1177/004728757801700202

Grebitus

Roosen

(2018). Influence of non-attendance on choices with varying complexity. European Journal of Marketing, 52(9/10), 2151-2172. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-02-2017-0143

Green

P. E.

Srinivasan

(1978). Conjoint analysis in consumer research: Issues and outlook. Journal of Consumer Research, 5(2), 103-123. https://doi.org/10.1086/208721

Huber

Wittink

D. R.

Fiedler

J. A.

Miller

(1993). The effectiveness of alternative preference elicitation procedures in predicting choice. Journal of Marketing Research, 30(1), 105-114. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224379303000109

Just

Carpenter

(1980). A theory of reading: From eye fixations to comprehension. Psychological Review, 87(4), 329-354. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.87.4.329

Kotsi

Pike

Gottlieb

(2018). Consumer-based brand equity (CBBE) in the context of an international stopover destination: Perceptions of Dubai in France and Australia. Tourism Management, 69(December), 297-306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2018.06.019

Krucien

Ryan

Hermens

(2017). Visual attention in multi-attributes choices: What can eye-tracking tell us? Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 135(March), 251-267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2017.01.018

10.

Louviere

J. J.

Flynn

T. N.

Carson

R. T.

(2010). Discrete choice experiments are not conjoint analysis. Journal of Choice Modelling, 3(3), 57-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1755-5345(13)70014-9

11.

Louviere

J. J.

Hensher

D. A.

Swait

J. D.

(2000). Stated choice methods: Analysis and applications. Cambridge University Press.

12.

Masiero

Qiu

R. T.

Zoltan

(2020). Long-haul tourist preferences for stopover destination visits. Journal of Tourism Research, 59(5), 811-827. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287519867143

13.

Mayo

E. J.

Jarvis

L. P.

(1981). The psychology of leisure travel. CBI.

14.

Meißner

Oppewal

Huber

(2020). Surprising adaptivity to set size changes in multi-attribute repeated choice tasks. Journal of Business Research, 111(April), 163-175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.01.008

15.

Morgan

Pritchard

Pride

(2011). Destination brands: Managing place reputation (3rd ed.). Butterworth-Heinemann.

16.

Myers

J. H.

Alpert

M. I.

(1977). Semantic confusion in attitude research. Advances in Consumer Research, 4, 106-110.

17.

Neslin

(1981). Linking product features to perceptions: self-stated versus statistically revealed importance weights. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 80-86. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800108

18.

Netzer

Srinivasan

(2011). Adaptive self-explication of multiattribute preferences. Journal of Marketing Research, 48(1), 140-146. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.48.1.140

19.

Oppewal

Huybers

Crouch

G. I.

(2015). Tourist destination and experience choice: A choice experimental analysis of decision sequence effects. Tourism Management, 48(June), 467-476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2014.12.016

20.

Orquin

J. L.

Loose

S. M.

(2013). Attention and choice: A review on eye movements in decision making. Acta Psychologica, 144(1), 190-206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.06.003

21.

Page

(2005). Transport and tourism (2nd ed.). Pearson Prentice Hall.

22.

Paulhus

D. L.

Vazire

(2007). The self-report method. In Robins

R. W.

Fraley

R. C.

Krueger

R. F.

(Eds.), Handbook of research methods in personality psychology (pp. 224-239). Guilford Press.

23.

Pike

(2002). The use of importance-performance analysis to identify determinant short break destination attributes in New Zealand. Pacific Tourism Review, 6(1), 23-33. https://eprints.qut.edu.au/6347/

24.

Pike

Kotsi

(2020). The 3 A’s of stopover destination attractiveness: Access, ambience, and attractions. Acta Turistica. Advance online publication. https://eprints.qut.edu.au/202837/

25.

Pike

Page

(2014). Destination marketing organizations and destination marketing: A narrative analysis of the literature. Tourism Management, 41(April), 202-227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2013.09.009

26.

Ritchie

J. R. B.

Zins

(1978). Culture as determinant of the attractiveness of a tourism region. Annals of Tourism Research, 5(2), 252-267. https://doi.org/10.1016/0160-7383(78)90223-2

27.

Sattler

Hensel-Börner

(2003). A comparison of conjoint measurement with self-explicated approaches. In Gustafsson

Herrmann

Huber

(Eds.), Conjoint measurement (pp. 147-159). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-24713-5_6

28.

Sawtooth Software. (2018). Lighthouse Studio v9.6. http://www.sawtoothsoftware.com

29.

Scott

Green

Fairley

(2016). Investigation of the use of eye-tracking to examine tourism advertising effectiveness. Current Issues in Tourism, 19(7), 634-642. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2014.1003797

30.

Scott

Zhang

Moyle

(2019). A review of eye-tracking research in tourism. Current Issues in Tourism, 22(10), 1244-1261. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2017.1367367

31.

Snepenger

Milner

(1990). Demographic and situational correlates of business travel. Journal of Travel Research, 28(4), 27-32. https://doi.org/10.1177/004728759002800406

32.

Taplin

R. H.

(2012). The value of self-stated attribute importance to overall satisfaction. Tourism Management, 33(2), 295-304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2011.03.008

33.

Van Loo

E. J.

Caputo

Nayga

R. M.

Seo

H.-S.

Zhang

Verbeke

(2015). Sustainability labels on coffee: Consumer preferences, willingness-to-pay, and visual attention to attributes. Ecological Economics, 118(October), 215-225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.07.011

34.

Woodside

A. G.

Sherrell

(1977). Traveler evoked, inept and inert sets of vacation destinations. Journal of Travel Research, 16(1), 14-18. https://doi.org/10.1177/004728757701600105

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.03 MB