Previous research has shown that consumers form perceptions of value when buying a bundle through the comparison of a bundle price to the sum of associated individual prices. The perceptions of value are then directly related to preference or choice. Using a prix fixe menu as a bundle exemplar, the above notion of value perception was empirically tested by investigating whether consumers were more likely to choose higher priced á la carte items to be included in their bundles when given an opportunity to choose between various prix fixe menus. The study finds that price differences among á la carte items indeed influenced consumers' choice decisions when selecting a prix fixe menu; consumers attached more importance to the higher priced appetizer and entrée items than the lower priced ones.
Barth, J.E. (2000). Application of a balanced attribute satiation model to predict consumer utility for multiple item meal bundles in restaurants. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.
2.
Beggs, S., Cardell, S., & Hausman, J. (1981). Assessing the potential demand for electric cars . Journal of Econometrics, 16(1), 1-19.
3.
Dellaert, B.G.C., Brazell, J.D., & Louviere, J.J. (1999). The effect of attribute variation on consumer choice consistency. Marketing Letters , 10(2), 137-147.
4.
Dodds, W.B., & Monroe, K.B. (1985). The effect of brand and price information on subjective product evaluations. Advances in Consumer Research, 12(1), 85-90.
5.
Foster, V., & Mourato, S. (1997). Behavioral consistency, statistical specification and validity in the contingent ranking method: Evidence from a survey on the impacts of pesticide use in the U.K. Retrieved December 11, 2006, from http://www.uea.ac.uk/env/cserge/pub/wp/gec/gec_1997_09.htm
6.
Gaeth, G.J., Levin, I.P., Chakraborth, G., & Leven, A.M. (1990). Consumer evaluation of multi-product bundles: An information integration analysis. Marketing Letters, 2(1), 47-57.
7.
Guiltinan, J.P. (1987). The price bundling of services: A normative framework . Journal of Marketing, 51(2), 74-85.
8.
Harral, A. (1999). The fixe is in. Restaurant Business , 98(20), 45-46.
9.
Holland, D., & Wessells, C.R. (1998). Predicting consumer preferences for fresh salmon: The influence of safety inspection and production method attributes. Agricultural and Resources Economics Review, 27(4), 1-14.
10.
Ida, T., & Sato, M. (2004). Conjoint analysis of consumer preferences for broadband services in Japan. Retrieved December 11, 2006, from http://www.econ.kyoto-u.ac.jp/~ida/3Kenkyuu/3Workingpaper/WPfile/2004/Ida-Sato(E).pdf
11.
Janiszewski, C., & Cunha, M., Jr. (2004). The influence of price discount framing on the evaluation of a product bundle. Journal of Consumer Research, 30(4), 534-546.
12.
Johnson, M.D., Herrmann, A., & Bauer, H.H. (1999). The effects of price bundling on consumer evaluations of product offerings. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 16(2), 129-142.
13.
Koo, L.C., Tao, F.K.C., & Yeung, J.H.C. (1999). Preferential segmentation of restaurant attributes through conjoint analysis. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 11(5), 242-250.
14.
Louviere, J.J., Hensher, D., & Swai, J. (2000). Conjoint preference elicitation methods in the broader context of random utility theory preference elicitation methods. In A. Gustafssion, A. Herrmann, & F. Huber (Eds.), Conjoint measurement: Method and application (pp. 280-286). Mainz, Germany: Springer.
15.
Monroe, K.B. (1990). Economics of price determination. Pricing: Making profitable decisions. New York: McGraw-Hill.
16.
Pavesic, D.V. (1999). History repeats itself as prix-fixe menus make a comeback in many restaurants. Nation's Restaurant News, 33(47), 22-24.
17.
Ratcliffe, J., Haselen, R.V., Buxton, M., Hardy, K., Colehan, J., & Partridge, M. (2002). Assessing patients' preferences for characteristics associated with homeopathic and conventional treatment of asthma: A conjoint analysis study. Thorax, 57, 503-508. Retrieved August 1, 2006, from http://thorax.bmj.com/cgi/reprint/57/6/503
18.
Simonson, I., & Tversky, A. (1992). Choice in context: Tradeoff contrast and extreme-ness aversion. Journal of Marketing Research, 29(3), 281-295.
19.
Smith, G.E., & Nagle, T. (1995). Frames of reference and buyers' perception of price and value. California Management Review, 38(1), 98-116.
20.
Thaler, R. (1985). Mental accounting and consumer choice. Marketing Science, 4(3), 199-214.
21.
Yadav, M.S., & Monroe, K.B. (1993). How buyers perceive savings in a bundle price: An examination of a bundle's transaction value. Journal of Marketing Research, 30(3), 350-358.
