A managerial compensation structure based on the pay-for-performance principle has been proposed as a better solution to the agency problem. Within the agency-theory framework, this study examined the determinants of cash compensation for chief executive officers (CEOs) of restaurant firms. After examining the financial data for 73 U.S. restaurant firms for 2002, the study found that restaurant CEO cash compensation was positively correlated with firm size and operating efficiency. Growth, debt leverage, profitability, and stock performance played no role in determining compensation. Large restaurant firms efficiently using assets tended to offer high cash compensation to their CEOs. Our findings have revealed that pay-for-performance was only partially practiced in the restaurant industry. To minimize the agency problem and enhance firm value, the industry should further tie CEO compensation to profitability and stock performance.
Abowd, J. M. (1990). Does performance-based managerial compensation affect corporate performance?Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 43(3), 52-73.
2.
Agarwal, N. C. (1981). Determinants of executive compensation. Industrial Relations, 20(1), 36-45.
3.
Agarwal, A., Makhija, A.K., & Mandelker, G.N. (1991). Executive compensation and corporate performance in electric and gas utilities. Financial Management, 20(4), 113-124.
4.
Anderson, M. C., Banker, R. D., & Ravindran, S. (2000). Executive compensation in the information technology industry. Management Science, 46(4), 530-547.
5.
Bloom, M., & Milkovich, G. (1998). Relationships among risk, incentive pay, and organizational performance. Academy of Management Journal, 41(3), 283-297.
6.
Carr, L. L. (1997). Strategic determinants of executive compensation in small publicly traded firms. Journal of Small Business Management, 35(2), 1-12.
7.
Cooley, P. L. (1979). Managerial pay and financial performance of small business. Journal of Business Research, 7(3), 267-276.
8.
Core, J. E., Holthausen, R. W., & Larcker, D. F. (1999). Corporate governance, chief executive officer compensation, and firm performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 51(3), 371-406.
9.
Elston, J. A., & Goldberg, L. G. (2003). Executive compensation and agency costs in Germany. Journal of Banking and Finance, 27(7), 1391-1410.
10.
Ely, K. M. (1991). Interindustry differences in the relation between compensation and firm performance variables. Journal of Accounting Research, 29(1), 37-58.
11.
Finkelstein, S., & Boyd, B. (1998). How much does the CEO matter? The role of managerial discretion in the setting of CEO compensation. Academy of Management Journal, 41(2), 179-199.
12.
Finkelstein, S., & Hambrick, D. C. (1989). Chief executive compensation: A study of the intersection of markets and political process. Strategic Management, 10(2), 121-134.
13.
Finkelstein, S., & Hambrick, D. C. (1996). Strategic leadership: Top executive and their effects on organization. New York: West.
14.
Firth, M., Lohne, J.C., Ropstad, R., & Sjo, J. (1996). The remuneration of CEOs and corporate financial performance in Norway. Managerial and Decision Economics, 17(3), 291-301.
15.
Firth, M., Tam, M., & Tang, M. (1999). The determinants of top management pay. The International Journal of Management Science, 27(6), 617-635.
16.
Gomez-Mejia, L. R., Larraza-Kintana, M., & Makri, M. (2003). The determinants of executive compensation in family-controlled public corporations. Academy of Management Journal, 46(2), 226-237.
17.
Gomez-Mejia, L. R., & Wiseman, R. M. (1997). Reframing executive compensation: An assessment and outlook. Journal of Management, 23(3), 291-374.
18.
Gregg, P., Machin, S., & Szymanski, S. (1993). The disappearing relationship between director’s pay and corporate performance. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 31(1), 1-9.
19.
Gu, Z. (2002). Analyzing bankruptcy in the restaurant industry: A multiple discriminant model. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 21(1), 25-42.
20.
Gu, Z., & Kim, H. (2003). An examination of the determinants of Hotel REITs’ unsystematic risk. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research, 27(2), 166-184.
21.
Ingham, H., & Thompson, S. (1995). Mutuality, performance, and executive compensation. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 57(3), 295-308.
22.
Jack in the Box CEO gets 36% hike, doubles options. (2003). Nation’s Restaurant News, 37(6), 34.
23.
Jensen, M. C. (1986). Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance and takeovers. American Economic Papers and Proceedings, 76(2), 323-329.
24.
Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305-360.
25.
Ke, B., Petroni, K., & Safieddine, A. (1999). Ownership concentration and sensitivity of executive pay to accounting performance measures: Evidence from publicly and privately-held insurance companies. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 28(2), 185-209.
26.
Kim, H., Gu, Z., & Mattila, A. (2002). Hotel REITs’ risk features and beta determinants. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Research, 20(2), 138-154.
27.
Kleinbaum. D. G., Kupper, L. L., & Muller, K. E. (1988). Applied regression analysis and other multivariable methods. Boston: PWS-KENT.
28.
Kren, L., & Kerr, J. L. (1997). The effects of outside directors and board shareholdings on the relation between chief executive compensation and firm performance. Accounting and Business Research, 27(4), 297-309.
29.
Kroll, M., Simmons, S. A., & Wright, P. (1990). Determinants of chief executive officer compensation following major acquisitions. Journal of Business Research, 20(4), 349-366.
30.
Lambert, R. A., Larcker, D. F., & Weigelt, K. (1991). How sensitive is executive compensation to organization size?Strategic Management, 12(5), 395-402.
31.
Mangel, R., & Singh, H. (1993). Ownership structure, board relationship and CEO compensation in large US corporations. Accounting and Business Research, 23(91A), 339-350.
32.
McKnight, P. J. (1996). An explanation of top executive pay: A UK study. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 34(4), 557-566.
33.
Murphy, K. J. (1985). Corporate performance and managerial remuneration: An empirical analysis. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 7, 11-42.
34.
Neter, J., Kutner, M. H., Nachtsheim, C. J., & Wasserman, W. (1996). Applied linear statistical models. Chicago: Irwin.
Reuters Investor. (2003). Financial information ratios. Retrieved November 23, 2003, from: http://yahoo.investor.reuters.com
37.
Riahi-Belkaoui, A. (1992). Executive compensation, organizational effectiveness, social performance and firm performance: An empirical investigation. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 19 (1), 25-38.
38.
Santerre, R. E., & Thomas, J. M. (1993). The determinants of hospital CEO compensation, Health Care Management Review, 18(3), 31-40.
39.
Schmidt, D. R., & Fowler, K. (1990). Post-acquisition financial performance and executive compensation. Strategic Management Journal, 11(7), 559-569.
40.
Stevens, J. (1986). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
41.
Tosi, H. L., & Gomez-Mejia, L. R. (1989). The decoupling CEO pay and performance: An agency theory perspective. Administrative Science Quarterly, 34(2), 169-189.
42.
Tosi, H. L., Werner, S., Katz, J. P., & Gomez-Mejia, L. R. (2000). How much does performance matter? A meta-analysis of CEO pay studies. Journal of Management, 26(2), 301-339.
43.
Veliyath, R., Ferris, S. P., & Ramaswamy, K. (1994). Business strategy and top management compensation: The mediating effects of employment risk, firm performance, and size. Journal of Business Research, 30(2), 149-159.
