This study investigated the dimensions of students'evaluations of teaching effectiveness in a school of hospitality business management and examined the interrelations among these dimensions. A rigorous process of statistical testing utilizing exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis resulted in the identification of four dimensions: organization, workload, instruction, and learning. Afterward, a structural model was proposed to examine the relationships among the four factors. The model proposed that students' perceptions of the teacher's organization, workload, and instructional abilities influence their perception of learning. Findings indicated that the three constructs have a significant positive impact on students'perception of learning and explain 78% of the variance in perception of learning.
Abrami, P. C., d’Apollonia, S.,& Rosenfield, S. (1997). The dimensionality of student ratings of instruction: What we know and what we do not. In R. P. Perry & J. C. Smart (Eds.), Effective teaching in higher education: Research and practice (1st ed., pp. 321-367). New York: Agathon.
2.
Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A reviewand recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411-423.
3.
Bailey, C. D., Gupta, S., & Schrader, R. W. (2000). Do students' judgement models of instructor effectiveness differ by course level, course content, or individual instructor?Journal of Accounting Education, 18(1),15-34.
4.
Barth, S. (2000). Eliciting feedback on your teaching. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Education, 12(1), 19-20.
5.
Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107(2), 238-246.
6.
Bentler, P. M.,& Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance test and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88(3), 591-606.
7.
Bogazzi, R. P., & Phillips, L. W. (1982). Representing and testing organizational theories: A holistic construal. Administrative Science Quarterly, 27(3), 459-489.
8.
Bollen, K. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York: Wiley.
9.
Braskamp, L. A., & Ory, J. C. (1994). Assessing faculty work: Enhancing individual and institutional performance. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
10.
Byrne, N. M. (1989). APrimer of LISREL: Basic applications and programming for confirmatory factor analytic models. New York: Springer-Verlag.
11.
Cahn, S. (1987). Faculty members should be evaluated by their peers, not by their students. Chronicle of Higher Education, 34(7), B2-B2.
12.
Cashin, W. E. (1988). Student ratings of teaching. A summary of research (IDEA paper No. 20). Manhattan: Kansas State University, Division of Continuing Education. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 302 567)
13.
Centra, J. A. (1993). Reflective faculty evaluation: Enhancing teaching and determining faculty effectiveness. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
14.
Chambers, E. (1992). Workload and quality of student learning. Studies in Higher Education, 17(2), 141-153.
15.
Chen, J. S., & Hsu, C.H.C. (2001). Developing and validating a riverboat gaming impact scale. Annals of Tourism, 28(2), 459-476.
16.
Clayson, D. E., & Haley, D. A. (1990). Student evaluations in marketing: What is actually being measured?Journal of Marketing Education, 12(1), 9-17.
17.
Dowell, D. A.,& Neal, J. A. (1982). A selective review of the validity of student ratings of teaching. Journal of Higher Education, 53(1), 51-62.
18.
Entwhistle, N., & Tait, H. (1990). Approaches to learning, evaluations of teaching, and preferences for contrasting academic environments. Higher Education, 19(3), 169-194.
19.
Feldman, K. A. (1976). The superior college teacher from the students' view. Research in Higher Education, 5(3), 243-288.
20.
Feldman, K. A. (1992). College students' view of male and female college teachers: Part I—Evidence from the social laboratory and experiments. Research in Higher Education, 33(3), 317-375.
21.
Finkelstein, M. J. (1995). College faculty as teachers. In H. Wecksler (Ed.), The NEA 1995 Almanac of Higher Education (pp. 33-47). Washington, DC: National Education Association.
22.
Fornell, C.,& Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50.
23.
Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L.,& Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
24.
Hatcher, L. (1994). A step-by-step approach to using the SAS system for factor analysis and structural equation modeling. Cary, NC: SAS.
25.
Hattie, J. (1985). Methodology review: Assessing unidimensionality of tests and terms. Applied Psychological Measurement, 9(2), 139-164.
26.
Hoelter, J. W. (1983). The analysis of covariance structures: Goodness-of-fit indices. Sociological Methods and Research, 11(3), 325-344.
27.
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1995). Evaluating model fit. In R. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues and applications (pp. 76-99). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
28.
Jackson, D. L., Teal, C. R., Raines, S. J., & Nansel, T. R. (1999). The dimensions of students' perceptions of teaching effectiveness. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 59(4), 580-596.
29.
Joreskog, K. G. (1993). Testing structural equation models. In K. A. Bollen and J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 294-316). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
30.
Joreskog, K. G.,& Sorbom, D. (1989). LISREL 7: User's reference guide (1st ed.) Chicago: Scientific Software.
31.
Joreskog, K. G.,& Sorbom, D. (1993). LISREL VIII manual. Chicago: Scientific Software International.
32.
Kapoor, S. (1999). Caring in the classroom: Innovative teaching technique. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research, 11(4), 9-12.
33.
King, A. S. (1983). How students size up prospective classes. Journal of Business Education, 12(2), 220-223.
34.
Lonka, K., & Ahola, K. (1995). Activating instruction—How to foster study and thinking skills in higher education. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 10(3), 351 – 368.
35.
Marks, R. B. (2000). Determinants of student evaluations of global measures of instructor and course value. Journal of Marketing Education, 22(2), 108-119.
36.
Marsh, H. W. (1982). Validity of students' evaluations of college teaching: A multitrait multimethod analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 74(2), 219-237.
37.
Marsh, H. W. (1984). Students' evaluations of university teaching: Dimensionality, reliability, validity, potential biases, and utility. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76(5), 707-754.
38.
Marsh, H. W. (1987). Students' evaluations of university teaching: Research findings, methodological issues, and directions for future research. International Journal of Educational Research, 11(3), 253-388.
39.
Marsh, H. W. (1991). Multidimensional students' evaluations of teaching effectiveness: A test of alternative higher-order structure. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83(2): 285-296.
40.
Marsh, H. W. (1994). Weighting for the right criteria in the Instructional Development and Effectiveness Assessment (IDEA) system: Global and specific ratings of teaching effectiveness and their relation to course objectives. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86(4), 631-648.
41.
Marsh, H. W.,& Dunkin, M. (1992). Students'evaluations of university teaching: Amultidimensional perspective. In J. C. Smart (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and practice (Vol. 8, pp. 143-233). New York: Agathon.
42.
Marsh, H. W., & Roche, L. A. (1997). Making students' evaluations of teaching effectiveness effective. American Psychologist, 52(11), 1187-1197.
43.
McCallum, L. W. (1984). A meta-analysis of course evaluation data and its use in the tenure decision. Research in Higher Education, 21(2): 150-158.
44.
Mulaik, S. A., James, L. R., Alstine, J. V., Bennett, N., Lind, S., & Stilwell, C. D. (1989). Evaluation of goodness-of-fit indices for structural equation models. Psychological Bulletin, 105(3), 430-445.
45.
Naftulin, D. H., Ware, J. E.,& Donnelly, F. A. (1973). The Doctor Fox lecture: Aparadigm of educational seduction. Journal of Medical Education, 48(2), 630-635.
46.
Newton, J. D. (1988). Using student evaluations of teaching in administrative control: The validity problem. Journal of Accounting Education, 6(1), 1-14.
47.
Nykiel, R. A. (1999). Effective teaching techniques for alternative delivery programs. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Education, 1(11), 8-11.
48.
Rabinowitz, J. (1998). Diagnostic reasoning and reliability. Journal of Mind and Behavior, 14(3), 297-315.
49.
Sethi, V., & King, W. (1994). Development of measures to assess the extent to which an information technology application provides competitive advantage. Management Science, 40(12), 1601-1624.
50.
Simpson, P. M., & Siguaw, J. A. (2000). Student evaluations of teaching: An exploratory study of the faculty response. Journal of Marketing Education, 22(3), 199-213.
51.
Tabachnick, B. G.,& Fidel, F. S. (1989). Using multivariate statistics (2nd ed.). New York: Harper Collins.
52.
Toomey, R., Priestly, I., Norman, A., & O’Mahony, G. B. (1998). Effective teaching and learning in a simulated environment: A higher education case study. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Education, 10(3), 28-32.
53.
Widmeyer, W. N.,& Loy, J. M. (1988). When you’re hot, you’re hot! Warm-cold effects in first impressions of persons and teaching effectiveness. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(1), 118-121.
54.
Wilson, R. (1998). New research casts doubt on value of student evaluations of professors. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 44(19), 12-23.
55.
Vermunt, J. D.,& Verloop, N. (1999). Congruence and friction between learning and teaching. Leaning and Instruction, 9(3), 257-280.
56.
Zaichkowsky, J. L. (1985). Measuring the involvement concept. Journal of Consumer Research, 12(3), 341-352.
