AliE.MacFarlandS.UmbreitJ. (2011). Effectiveness of combining tangible symbols with the picture exchange communication system to teach requesting skills to children with multiple disabilities including visual impairment. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 46, 425–435.
2.
BeukelmanD.LightJ. (2020). Augmentative and alternative communication: Supporting children & adults with complex communication needs (5th ed.). Paul H. Brookes.
3.
BlahaR. (2001). Calendars for students with multiple impairments including deaf blindness. Texas School for the Blind and Visually Impaired.
BruceS. (2005). The impact of congenital deaf blindness on the struggle to symbolism. International Journal of Disability, Development Education, 52, 233–251. https://doi.org/10.1080/10349120500252882
EricksonK.GeistL. (2016). The profiles of students with significant cognitive disabilities and complex communication needs. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 32, 187–197. https://doi.org/10.1080/07434618.2016.1213312
8.
FrostL.BondyA. (2002). The picture exchange communication system training manual (2nd ed.). Pyramid Educational Products.
9.
HojnoskiR.GischlarK.MissallK. (2009). Improving child outcomes with data-based decision making: Collecting data. Young Exceptional Children, 12(3), 32–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/1096250609346249
10.
IbrahimS.VasalouA.ClarkeM. (2018, April21–26). Design opportunities for AAC and children with severe speech and physical impairments [Conference session]. 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1–13), Montreal, QC.
11.
IvyS.HattonD.HooperJ. (2014). Using the Picture Exchange Communication System with students with visual impairment. Exceptional Children, 80, 474–488. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402914527239
12.
IvyS.RobbinsA.KerrM. (2020). Adapted Picture Exchange Communication System using tangible symbols for young learners with significant multiple disabilities. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 36, 166–178. https://doi.org/10.1080/07434618.2020.1826051
13.
KulkarniS.ParmarJ. (2017). Culturally and linguistically diverse student and family perspectives of AAC. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 33, 170–180. https://doi.org/10.1080/07434618.2017.1346706
14.
LaneJ. D.BrownJ. A. (2016). Promoting communication development in young children with or at risk for disabilities. In ReichowB.BoydB.BartonE.OdomS. (Eds.), Handbook of early childhood special education (pp. 199–224). Springer.
15.
LaubscherE.LightJ. (2020). Core vocabulary lists for young children and considerations for early language development: A narrative review. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 36(1), 43–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/07434618.2020.1737964
16.
McCollowM.HoffmanH. (2020). Evidence-based decision-making: A team effort toward achieving goals. Young Exceptional Children, 23(1), 15–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/1096250618801287
17.
McConnellS.RahnN. (2016). Assessment in early childhood special education. In ReichowB.BoydB. A.BartonE. E.OdomS. L. (Eds.), Handbook of early childhood special education (pp. 89–106). Springer.
18.
RauschA.BoldE.StrainP. (2021). The more the merrier: Using collaborative transdisciplinary services. Young Exceptional Children, 24(2), 59–69. https://doi.org/10.1177/1096250620922206
19.
RiveraC.HaughneyK.ClarkK.WerungaR. (2022). Culturally responsive planning, instruction, and reflection for young children with significant disabilities. Young Exceptional Children, 25(2), 74–87. https://doi.org/10.1177/1096250620951767
20.
RocheL.SigafoosJ.LancioniG.ReillyM.GreenV. A.SutherlandD.. . . EdrisinhaC. (2014). Tangible symbols as an AAC option for individuals with developmental disabilities. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 30(1), 28–39. https://doi.org/10.3109/07434618.2013.878958
RowlandC.SchweigertP. (1990). Tangible symbol systems: Symbolic communication for individuals with multisensory impairments. Communication Skill Builders.
SalazarM. (2012). Home-school collaboration for embedding individualized goals in daily routines. Young Exceptional Children, 15(3), 20–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/1096250612446870
25.
SpoonerF.McKissickB.KnightV. (2017). Establishing the state of affairs for evidence-based practices in students with severe disabilities. Research and Practice for Persons With Severe Disabilities, 42(1), 8–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/1540796916684896
26.
SunT.BowlesR.GerdeH.DouglasS. (2022). Supporting AAC use for preschoolers with complex communication needs. Young Exceptional Children, 25(2), 101–112. https://doi.org/10.1177/1096250620959664
27.
TriefE. (2007). The use of tangible cues for children with multiple disabilities and visual impairment. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 101(10), 613–619. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145482X0710101006
28.
TriefE.BruceS.CascellaP.IvyS. (2009). The development of a universal tangible symbol system. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 103(7), 425–430. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145482X0910300706
29.
TriefE.CascellaP.BruceS. (2013). A field study of a standardized tangible symbol system for learners who are visually impaired and have multiple disabilities. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 107(3), 180–191. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145482X1310700303