AlolayanS. A. (2022). Identifying family needs, support, and barriers for more effective involvement in early intervention services. Open Science Index 16 2022, 2, 241.
BabikI.CunhaA. B.RossS. M.LoganS. W.GallowayJ. C.LoboM. A. (2019). Means-end problem solving in infancy: Development, emergence of intentionality, and transfer of knowledge. Developmental Psychobiology, 61(2), 191–202.
4.
BaharinN.KamarudinN.ManafU. K. A. (2018). Integrating STEM education approach in enhancing higher order thinking skills. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 8(7), 810–822.
5.
BechtelS.JeschonekS.PauenS. (2013). How 24-month-olds form and transfer knowledge about tools: The role of perceptual, functional, causal, and feedback information. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 115(1), 163–179.
6.
CampbellP. H.MilbourneS. A.KennedyA. A. (2012). CARA’s kit for toddlers: Creating adaptations for routines and activities. Paul Brookes.
7.
CampbellP. H.MilbourneS. A.WilcoxM. J. (2008). Adaptation interventions to promote participation in natural settings. Infants & Young Children, 21, 94–106.
8.
ClementsD. H.VinhM.LimC. I.SaramaJ. (2021). STEM for inclusive excellence and equity. Early Education and Development, 32(1), 148–171.
9.
Division for Early Childhood of the Council for Exceptional Children. (2014). DEC recommended practices in early intervention/early childhood special education. http://www.dec-sped.org/recommendedpractices
10.
DunstC. J.BruderM. B.TrivetteC. M.HambyD. W. (2006). Everyday activity settings, natural learning environments, and early intervention practices. Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities, 3(1), 3–10.
11.
DunstC. J.BruderM. B.TrivetteC. M.RaabM.McLeanM. (2001). Natural learning opportunities for infants, toddlers, and preschoolers. Young Exceptional Children, 4(3), 18–25.
12.
DunstC. J.RaabM. (2013). Checklist and guidelines for identifying young children’s interests. Everyday Child Language Learning Tools, 3. http://www.puckett.org/CECLL/ECLLTools_1.pdf
13.
Early Childhood STEM Working Group. (2017). Early STEM matters: Providing high-quality STEM experiences for all young learners. UChicago STEM Education and Erikson Institute.
14.
FahmiyatiD. T. (2020). Scientific thinking characteristics of early childhood [Conference session]. Sixth International Conference on Education and Technology (ICET 2020), pp. 135–138, Atlantis Press.
15.
FusaroM.SmithM. C. (2017). Preschoolers’ inquisitiveness and science-relevant problem solving. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 42, 119–127.
16.
JenningsD.HanlineM. F.WoodsJ. (2012). Using routine-based interventions in early childhood special education. Dimensions of Early Childhood, 40, 13–23.
17.
JohnsonJ. J.RahnN. L.BrickerD. (2015). An activity-based approach to early intervention (4th ed.). Paul Brookes.
18.
KempP.TurnbullA. P. (2014). Coaching with parents in early intervention: An interdisciplinary research synthesis. Infants & Young Children, 27(4), 305–324.
19.
LapekJ. (2018). Promoting 21st century skills in problem-based learning environments. CTETE-Research Monograph Series, 1(1), 66–85.
20.
LevineS. C.SuriyakhamL. W.RoweM. L.HuttenlocherJ.GundersonE. A. (2010). What counts in the development of young children’s number knowledge?Developmental Psychology, 46, 1309–1319.
21.
LukieI. K.SkwarchukS. L.LeFevreJ. A.SowinskiC. (2014). The role of child interests and collaborative parent–child interactions in fostering numeracy and literacy development in Canadian homes. Early Childhood Education Journal, 42(4), 251–259.
22.
McClureE. R.GuernseyL.ClementsD. H.BalesS. N.NicholsJ.Kendall-TaylorN.LevineM. H. (2017). STEM starts early: Grounding science, technology, engineering, and math education in early childhood. Joan Ganz Cooney Center at Sesame Workshop.
23.
McWilliamR. A. (2010). Routines-based early intervention: Supporting young children and their families. Paul H. Brookes.
24.
McWilliamR. A.CaseyA. M.SimsJ. (2009). The routines-based interview: A method for gathering information and assessing needs. Infants & Young Children, 22, 224–233.
25.
MeadanH.OstroskyM. M.SantosR. M.SnodgrassM. R. (2013). How can I help? Prompting procedures to support children’s learning. Young Exceptional Children, 16, 31–39.
26.
PiagetJ.InhelderB. (1969). The psychology of the child. Basic Books.
27.
RahnN. L.CoogleC. G.OttleyJ. R. (2019). Early childhood special education teachers’ use of embedded learning opportunities within classroom routines and activities. Infants & Young Children, 32(1), 3–19.
28.
RushD. D.SheldenM. L. (2020). The early childhood coaching handbook. Paul H. Brookes.
29.
SandallS. R.SchwartzI. S.JosephG. E.GauvreauA. N. (2019). Building blocks for teaching preschoolers with special needs (3rd ed.). Paul H. Brookes.
30.
SikderS.FleerM. (2015). Small science: Infants and toddlers experiencing science in everyday family life. Research in Science Education, 45(3), 445–464.
31.
SnyderP.RakapS.HemmeterM. L.McLaughlinT.SandallS.McLeanM. (2015). Naturalistic instructional approaches in early learning: A systematic review of the empirical literature. Journal of Early Intervention, 37(1), 69–97.
32.
StudhalterU. T.LeuchterM.TettenbornA.ElmerA.EdelsbrunnerP. A.SaalbachH. (2021). Early science learning: The effects of teacher talk. Learning and Instruction, 71, 1–16.
33.
UhlenbergJ. M.GeikenR. (2021). Supporting young children’s spatial understanding: Examining toddlers’ experiences with contents and containers. Early Childhood Education Journal, 49, 49–60.
34.
UzgirisI.HuntJ. McV. (1975). Assessment in infancy: Ordinal scales of psychological development. University of Illinois Press.
35.
Van MeeterenB. D.PetersonS. (2022). Investigating STEM with infants and toddlers (Birth–3). Teachers College Press.
36.
WintonP. J.BuysseV.TurnbullA.RousB.HollingsworthH. (2010). CONNECT module 1: Embedded interventions. University of North Carolina, FPG Child Development Institute, CONNECT: The Center to Mobilize Early Childhood Knowledge. https://connectmodules.dec-sped.org/connect-modules/learners/module-1/
37.
ŽivkoviĿS. (2016). A model of critical thinking as an important attribute for success in the 21st century. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 232, 102–108.