ArtilesA. J. (2020). Inclusive education in the 21st century disruptive interventions. The Educational Forum, 84(4), 289–295.
2.
ArtilesA. J.BalA.ThoriusK. A. K. (2010). Back to the future: A critique of response to intervention’s social justice views. Theory Into Practice, 49(4), 250–257.
3.
BaconJ.PomponioE. (2020). A call for radical over reductionist approaches to “inclusive” reform in neoliberal times: An analysis of position statements in the United States. International Journal of Inclusive Education. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2020.1858978
4.
BartonE. E.SmithB. J. (2015). Advancing high-quality preschool inclusion: A discussion and recommendations for the field. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 35(2), 69–78.
5.
BenekeM. R.ParkC. C. (Eds.). (2019). Social justice approaches in inclusive early childhood education: Anti-bias curriculum and critical praxis [Special issue]. Young Exceptional Children, 22(2), 55–111.
BlancoH. (1994). How to think about social problems: American pragmatism and the idea of planning. Greenwood Press.
8.
CornettJ.KnackstedtK. M. (2020). Original sin(s): Lessons from the US model of special education and an opportunity for leaders. Journal of Educational Administration, 58(5), 507–520.
9.
Division for Early Childhood/National Association for the Education of Young Children. (2009). Early childhood inclusion: A joint position statement of the Division for Early Childhood (DEC) and the National Association for the Education of Young Children (NAEYC). https://www.decdocs.org/position-statement-inclusion
10.
Education for All Handicapped Children Act, Pub. L. No. 94–142 (1975).
11.
Education of the Handicapped Act, Pub. L. No. 99–457 (1986).
12.
FloresN. (2013). Silencing the subaltern: Nation-state/colonial governmentality and bilingual education in the United States. Critical Inquiry in Language Studies, 10(4), 263–287.
13.
FloresN.SchisselJ. L. (2014). Dynamic bilingualism as the norm: Envisioning a heteroglossic approach to standards-based reform. TESOL Quarterly, 48(3), 454–479.
14.
FoucaultM. (1970). The order of things. Pantheon Books.
15.
FoucaultM. (1973). The birth of the clinic. Routledge.
16.
FoucaultM. (1977). Discipline and punish. Panthenon.
17.
FoucaultM. (2007). Security, territory, population: Lectures at the Collége de France 1977–1978. Picador.
18.
FreireP. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. Herder and Herder.
19.
GartnerA.LipskyD. K. (1987). Beyond special education: Toward a quality system for all students. Harvard Educational Review, 57(4), 367–396.
20.
GreensteinA. (2015). Radical inclusive education: Disability, teaching and struggles for liberation. Routledge.
21.
GuralnickM. J.BruderM. B. (2016). Early childhood inclusion in the United States. Infants & Young Children, 29(3), 166–177.
22.
Individuals With Disabilities Act, Pub. L. No. 105-17 (1997).
23.
KurthJ.FoleyJ. A. (2014). Reframing teacher education: Preparing teachers for inclusive education. Inclusion, 2(4), 286–300.
24.
McCabeK. M.RupparA.KurthJ. A.McQuestonJ. A.JohnstonR.ToewsS. G. (2020). Cracks in the continuum: A critical analysis of least restrictive environment for students with significant support needs. Teachers College Record, 122(5), 197–209.
25.
McCallZ.SkrticT. (2009). Intersectional needs politics: A policy frame for the wicked problem of disproportionality. Multiple Voices for Ethnically Diverse Exceptional Learners, 11(2), 3–23.
26.
McLeskeyJ.WaldronN. L.SpoonerF.AlgozzineB. (2014). What are effective inclusive schools and why are they important. In McLeskeyJ.WaldronN. L.SpoonerF.AlgozzineB. (Eds.), Handbook of effective inclusive schools: Research and practice (pp. 3–16). Routledge.
27.
ReaganT. (2002). Toward an “archeology of deafness”: Etic and emic constructions of identity in conflict. Journal of Language, Identity, and Education, 1(1), 41–66.
28.
RittelH. W.WebberM. M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4(2), 155–169.
29.
SchönD. (1993). Generative metaphor: A perspective on problem-setting in social policy. In OrtonyA. (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (pp. 137–163). Cambridge University Press.
30.
SkrticT. M. (1995a). Deconstructing/reconstructing public education: Social reconstruction in the postmodern era. In SkrticT. M. (Ed.), Disability and democracy: Reconstructing (special) education for postmodernity (pp. 233–273). Teachers College Press.
31.
SkrticT. M. (1995b). The functionalist view of special education and disability: Deconstructing the conventional knowledge tradition. In SkrticT. M. (Ed.), Disability and democracy: Reconstructing (special) education for postmodernity (pp 65–103). Teachers College Press.
32.
SkrticT. M. (2012). Disability, difference, and justice: Strong democratic leadership for undemocratic times. In CrockettJ. B.BillingsleyB. S.BoscardinM. L. (Eds.), Handbook of leadership and administration for special education (pp. 129–150). Routledge.
33.
SkrticT. M. (2013). The civic professional in Deweyan democracy. Borderlands, 2, 1–16.
34.
SkrticT. M. (2019). Wicked problems, social problems, interdisciplinarity, and generative metaphors [Cross-specialization seminar]. The University of Kansas.
35.
U.S. Department of Education. (1995). Annual report to Congress on the implementation of the Individuals With Disabilities Act.
U.S. Department of Education. (2020). Annual report to Congress on the implementation of the Individuals With Disabilities Act.
38.
ValenteJ. M. (2016). “Your American Sign Language interpreters are hurting our education”: Toward a relational understanding of inclusive classroom pedagogy. Transformations: The Journal of Inclusive Scholarship and Pedagogy, 25(2), 20–36.
39.
WaitollerF. R.AnnammaS. A. (2017). Taking a spatial turn in inclusive education: Seeking justice at the intersections of multiple markers of difference. In HughesM. T.TalbottE. (Eds.), The Wiley handbook of diversity in special education (pp. 23–44). Wiley-Blackwell.
40.
WodakR.MeyerM. (2016). Critical discourse analysis: History, agenda, theory and methodology. In WodakR.MeyerM. (Eds.), Methods of critical discourse studies (3rd ed., pp. 1–33). SAGE.